我正在尝试使用HeapAlloc()来分配SetupDiGetDeviceRegistryProperty()使用的缓冲区。
在GetDeviceInformation()中,我有:
HANDLE hHeap = GetProcessHeap();
while (SetupDiEnumDeviceInfo(DeviceInfoSet, MemberIndex++, DeviceInfoData))
{
DWORD DataT;
LPTSTR buffer = NULL;
DWORD buffersize = 0;
// port of device
DWORD portnum = 0;
GetRegistryProperty(DeviceInfoSet, DeviceInfoData, SPDRP_FRIENDLYNAME,
&DataT, buffer, &buffersize, &buffersize);
if (!buffer)
{
cerr << "Null Ptr!" << endl;
exit(1);
}
// Do stuff, uninstall device
if (buffer) HeapFree(hHeap, NULL, buffer);
}
}在GetRegistryProperty()内部,我有:
void GetRegistryProperty(HDEVINFO DeviceInfoSet, PSP_DEVINFO_DATA DeviceInfoData,
DWORD Property, PDWORD DataT, LPTSTR buffer, PDWORD buffersize, PDWORD size)
{
HANDLE hHeap = GetProcessHeap();
while (!SetupDiGetDeviceRegistryProperty(
DeviceInfoSet,
DeviceInfoData,
Property, //SPDRP_FRIENDLYNAME or SPDRP_CLASS
DataT, //&DataT
(PBYTE)buffer,
*buffersize,
size)) //&buffersize
{
if (GetLastError() == ERROR_INSUFFICIENT_BUFFER)
{
// Change the buffer size.
if (buffer) HeapFree(hHeap, NULL, buffer);
// Double the size to avoid problems on
// W2k MBCS systems per KB 888609.
buffer = (LPTSTR)HeapAlloc(hHeap, HEAP_ZERO_MEMORY |
HEAP_GENERATE_EXCEPTIONS, *buffersize * 2);
}
else
{
// error handling
break;
}
}
}在GetRegistryProperty()返回之前,HeapAlloc()会按预期工作(缓冲区中填充了该属性)。此时,缓冲区始终为空。这也是意料之中的吗?如何返回指向一个数组的char *,该数组存在于创建它的函数的生命周期之后?我假设我不理解HeapAlloc()是如何工作的。
我把它放在一个单独的函数中的原因是,我想用不同的DWORD Property多次调用GetRegistryProperty(),在我将代码移到一个单独的函数之前,它工作得很好。
发布于 2012-11-21 11:06:52
通过引用传递buffer (注意LPTSTR&):
void GetRegistryProperty(HDEVINFO DeviceInfoSet, PSP_DEVINFO_DATA DeviceInfoData,
DWORD Property, PDWORD DataT, LPTSTR& buffer, PDWORD buffersize, PDWORD size)发布于 2012-11-21 11:09:08
您是通过值传递buffer的,因此在GetRegistryProperty中,当您重新分配它时,您只需覆盖GetRegistryProperty中指针的副本。
将GetRegistryProperty的签名更改为:
void GetRegistryProperty(HDEVINFO DeviceInfoSet, PSP_DEVINFO_DATA DeviceInfoData, DWORD Property, PDWORD DataT, LPTSTR& buffer, PDWORD buffersize, PDWORD size)https://stackoverflow.com/questions/13485672
复制相似问题