我在尝试计算晶体结构的压强张量。要做到这一点,我必须遍历所有的粒子对,如下面的简化代码所示
do i=1, atom_number ! sum over atoms i
type1 = ATOMS(i)
do nj=POINT(i), POINT(i+1)-1 ! sum over atoms j of i's atoms list
j = LIST(nj)
type2 = ATOMS(j)
call get_ff_param(type1,type2,Aab,Bab,Cab,Dab)
call distance_sqr2(i,j,r,VECT_R)
call gettensor_rij(i,j,T)
r = sqrt(r)
if (r<coub_cutoff) then
local_sum_real(id+1) = local_sum_real(id+1) + ( erfc(alpha_ewald*r)
derivative = -( erfc(alpha_ewald*r)
ff = - (1.0d0/r)*derivative
STRESS_EWALDD = STRESS_EWALDD + ff * T ! A 3x3 matrix
FDX(i) = FDX(i) + VECT_R(1) * ff
FDY(i) = FDY(i) + VECT_R(2) * ff
FDZ(i) = FDZ(i) + VECT_R(3) * ff
FDX(j) = FDX(j) - VECT_R(1) * ff
FDY(j) = FDY(j) - VECT_R(2) * ff
FDZ(j) = FDZ(j) - VECT_R(3) * ff
end if
end do ! sum over atoms j
sum_kin = sum_kin + ATMMASS(i) * (VX(i)**2 + VY(i)**2 + VZ(i)**2)
call gettensor_v(i,Q)
STRESS_KINETIC = STRESS_KINETIC + ATMMASS(i) * Q
end do 我试图用"paralle do“指令并行化这个双循环,但是在张量STRESS_EWALDD和力FDX上遇到了一些问题。因此,我尝试为每个线程手动分配一些粒子,就像下面的代码一样,但仍然得到了错误的张量值。
!$omp parallel private(id,j,i,nj,type1,type2,T,Q,r,VECT_R,derivative,Aab,Bab,Cab,Dab,ff)
id = omp_get_thread_num()
do i=id+1, atom_number,nthreads ! sum over atoms i
type1 = ATOMS(i)
do nj=POINT(i), POINT(i+1)-1 ! sum over atoms j of i's atoms list
j = LIST(nj)
type2 = ATOMS(j)
call get_ff_param(type1,type2,Aab,Bab,Cab,Dab)
call distance_sqr2(i,j,r,VECT_R)
call gettensor_rij(i,j,T)
r = sqrt(r)
if (r<coub_cutoff) then
local_sum_real(id+1) = local_sum_real(id+1) + ( erfc(alpha_ewald*r)
derivative = -( erfc(alpha_ewald*r)
ff = - (1.0d0/r)*derivative
local_STRESS_EWALDD(id+1,:,:) = local_STRESS_EWALDD(id+1,:,:) + ff * T
FDX(i) = FDX(i) + VECT_R(1) * ff
FDY(i) = FDY(i) + VECT_R(2) * ff
FDZ(i) = FDZ(i) + VECT_R(3) * ff
FDX(j) = FDX(j) - VECT_R(1) * ff
FDY(j) = FDY(j) - VECT_R(2) * ff
FDZ(j) = FDZ(j) - VECT_R(3) * ff
end if
end do ! sum over atoms j
local_sum_kin(id+1) = local_sum_kin(id+1) + ATMMASS(i) * (VX(i)**2 + VY(i)**2 + VZ(i)**2)
call gettensor_v(i,Q)
local_STRESS_KINETIC(id+1,:,:) = local_STRESS_KINETIC(id+1,:,:) + ATMMASS(i) * Q
end do ! sum over atoms i
!$omp end parallel
do i=1,nthreads
sum_real = sum_real + local_sum_real(i)
sum_virial_buck = sum_virial_buck + local_sum_virial_buck(i)
STRESS_BUCK = STRESS_BUCK + local_STRESS_BUCK(i,:,:)
STRESS_EWALDD = STRESS_EWALDD + local_STRESS_EWALDD(i,:,:)
sum_buck = sum_buck + local_sum_buck(i)
sum_kin = sum_kin + local_sum_kin(i)
STRESS_KINETIC = STRESS_KINETIC + local_STRESS_KINETIC(i,:,:)
end do 标量和STRESS_KINETIC值是正确的,但是STRESS_EWALDD是错误的,我不知道为什么。到目前为止,我对力还一无所知。所以我真的很喜欢这里的点击量。谢谢,
Éric.发布于 2012-05-30 16:05:30
您使用了一种有点非正统的方法来使用OpenMP。
OpenMP提供了reduction(op:vars)子句,该子句使用op对vars中变量的局部值执行缩减,您应该将其用于STRESS_EWALD、sum_kin、sum_real和STRESS_KINETIC。第i个原子的力累积应该有效,因为Verlet列表POINT中的原子是有序的(您从Allen & Tildesley的书中获得了构建它的代码,对吗?)但不是为了第j个原子。这就是为什么你也应该对它们执行缩减的原因。如果你在一些老的OpenMP手册中读到缩减变量必须是标量的,不用担心--较新的OpenMP版本支持在Fortran 90+中对数组变量进行缩减。
!$OMP PARALLEL DO PRIVATE(....)
!$OMP& REDUCTION(+:FDX,FDY,FDZ,sum_kin,sum_real,STRESS_EWALDD,STRESS_KINETIC)
!$OMP& SCHEDULE(DYNAMIC)
do i=1, atom_number ! sum over atoms i
type1 = ATOMS(i)
do nj=POINT(i), POINT(i+1)-1 ! sum over atoms j of i's atoms list
j = LIST(nj)
type2 = ATOMS(j)
call get_ff_param(type1,type2,Aab,Bab,Cab,Dab)
call distance_sqr2(i,j,r,VECT_R)
call gettensor_rij(i,j,T)
r = sqrt(r)
if (r<coub_cutoff) then
sum_real = sum_real + ( erfc(alpha_ewald*r)
derivative = -( erfc(alpha_ewald*r)
ff = - (1.0d0/r)*derivative
STRESS_EWALDD = STRESS_EWALDD + ff * T ! A 3x3 matrix
FDX(i) = FDX(i) + VECT_R(1) * ff
FDY(i) = FDY(i) + VECT_R(2) * ff
FDZ(i) = FDZ(i) + VECT_R(3) * ff
FDX(j) = FDX(j) - VECT_R(1) * ff
FDY(j) = FDY(j) - VECT_R(2) * ff
FDZ(j) = FDZ(j) - VECT_R(3) * ff
end if
end do ! sum over atoms j
sum_kin = sum_kin + ATMMASS(i) * (VX(i)**2 + VY(i)**2 + VZ(i)**2)
call gettensor_v(i,Q)
STRESS_KINETIC = STRESS_KINETIC + ATMMASS(i) * Q
end do
!$OMP END PARALLEL DO当每个原子的邻居数目变化很大时,使用动态循环调度将减少负载不平衡。
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/10811302
复制相似问题