blocks|key|4214014|text|使用Basic4android有很多优点。这是一个整洁的包，得到了作者Erel的很好支持。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|4214015|优点%2B功能丰富的设置%2B智能感知编辑器%2B许多库%2B+GUI设计器%2B简单易用的语言%2B调试器|4214016|缺点-缺乏对面向对象的支持-+Subs中没有唯一的全局变量|4214017|entityMap^0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$]]

There are many many pros to using Basic4android. Its a neat package and well supported by the author Erel.

Pros
+ Feature-rich in terms of settings
+ Intellisense editor
+ Many libraries
+ GUI designer
+ Plain and easy to pick up language
+ Debugger

Cons
- lack of support for Object orientation
- No unique global variables within Subs

blocks|key|529769|text|我看到的唯一真正的缺点是(可能)浪费49.00美元;)|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|529770|坦率地说，我鼓励任何人下载Google+SDK并熟悉Android+Studio和Java+API。|529771|但是这看起来可能非常容易上手，不应该招致任何运行时性能损失，并允许您创建无障碍(完全可重新分发)的APK。|529772|因此，如果你更喜欢Basic而不是Java，并且有49美元的闲钱--当然，去吧！|529773|我的..。|529774|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|M|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|O|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|-4|5|6|7|Q|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|K|$]]

The only real down side I see is (potentially) wasting $49.00 ;)

Frankly, I'd encourage anyone to download the Google SDK and become familiar with Android Studio and the Java API.

But this looks like it might be very easy to get started with, shouldn't incur any runtime performance penalty, and allows you to create unencumbered (fully redistributable) APK's.

So if you prefer Basic over Java, and have a spare $49 - sure, go for it!

IMHO...

blocks|key|532731|text|在尝试了Basic4Android、Eclips、RadStudio+Xe2和Windev+Mobile等我曾寄予厚望的虚拟平台后，我可以说我非常喜欢B4A。到目前为止我发现的最简单的，也是最有用的例子。至于限制，我只发现了几个，而且这些限制很容易解决，因为您可以将任何Java代码包装在B4A可以很容易使用的库中。有了这个功能，如果需要的话，我可以转到Eclips生成代码并在B4A中使用它。我不是Basic的粉丝。但我也不懂Java。对我来说，这不是问题所在。这是界面的易用性而不会迷路，最重要的是，这是手机几乎可以做的一切的一个坚实的例子。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|532732|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

After trying virtual every platform from Basic4Android, thru Eclips, RadStudio Xe2, and Windev Mobile which I had high hopes for, I can say I strongly prefer B4A. The easiest I found by far, and the most useful examples by far. As far as limitations, I have found only a few and those are easily gotten around since you can take any Java code and wrap it in a library that B4A can use quite easily. With that capability, I can go to Eclips if needed and generate code and use it in B4A. I am not a fan of Basic. But I also do not know Java. For me that was not the issue. It was the ease of using the interface without getting lost and most important, a solid example of damn near everything the phone can do.

blocks|key|2599160|text|我看到的唯一缺点是并不是所有Android+Java+API都被支持。有一些东西(比如MapView+)在B4A中(目前)是不可用的。最重要的东西是可用的，但仍有一些部分需要改进(如homescreen小部件)。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|2599161|如果你想快速获得好的结果，并且不需要使用每一个奇异的Android功能，那就试一试吧。|2599162|如果您想使用Android中的所有可用特性，那么只有一种方法可以选择Eclipse+IDE并直接使用Java。但是，与使用B4A相比，您必须投入更多的时间进行开发。|2599163|entityMap^0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$]]

The only disadvantage I see is that not everything from the whole Android Java API is supported. There are some things (like the MapView for example) that are (currently) not usable in B4A. The most important things are available but there are still parts which need some improvement (like the homescreen widgets).

If you want to get good results very quickly and don't need to use every exotic Android feature, give it a try.

If you want access to every feature that is available in Android there is only the way to choose the Eclipse IDE and directly use Java. But you have to invest much more time for developing than you have to do with B4A.

blocks|key|529856|text|就我个人而言，作为B4A和一般编程的初学者，我的主要障碍是在一开始似乎有一个陡峭的学习曲线(我仍在努力攀登)。我确信这一点适用于任何语言/IDE。我只希望有更多针对像我这样的用户的教程。初学者指南很棒，但即使在其中，也有一些我不太理解的地方。我来自AppInventor，我在一个月内做了3个应用程序。我希望Erel或其他一些用户可以制作Youtube视频教程！|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|529857|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

Personally as a beginner to B4A and programming in general, my main hurdle is there seems to be a steep learning curve in the very beginning (which I'm still trying to ascend). I'm sure this holds true for any language/IDE. I just wish there were more tutorials geared towards users like me. The beginner's guide is great but even in there there are things I don't quite understand. I came from AppInventor in which I made 3 apps within a month. I wish Erel or some of the other users would make Youtube video tutorials!

blocks|key|2599328|text|对于我来说，作为一个有成就的VB.NET程序员，刚开始使用Eclipse有太多的陷阱，说明不清楚，对于初学者来说，事情就是不起作用。安装这个和那个两个星期，仍然可以让Hello+World运行。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|offset|length|style|CODE|entityRanges|data|2599329|在过去的10年里，我有一个用VB.NET编写的函数的巨大代码库，让这些函数移植进来，虽然不是微不足道的，但发生得很快。对于Basic4Android，我在他们的列表中运行了3个安装程序，并开始编码。在几分钟内，我使用Eclipse完成了比几周更多的工作。|2599330|如果你在VB中精疲力竭，除非你有一个伙伴可以让你前进，否则你在Basic4Android上遥遥领先。|2599331|entityMap^0|E|6|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@$9|M|A|N|B|C]]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|O|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|P|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|J|3|-4|5|6|7|Q|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]]|K|$]]

As an accomplished <code>VB.NET</code> programmer for me there were so many traps to just getting started with Eclipse, instructions weren't clear, things just didn't work for the beginner. Two weeks of installing this and that, and still could get Hello World to run.

I have a huge codebase of functions of have written with VB.NET in the last 10 years, and getting those functions ported across, while not trivial, happens quickly. With Basic4Android I ran the 3 installs in their list, and started coding. In minutes I had accomplished more than with weeks with Eclipse.

If you are exerienced in VB, unless you have a buddy that can get you going, you are way ahead with Basic4Android.

blocks|key|4214094|text|我的意见是，如果你熟悉VB，最好使用b4a。这不是浪费钱。与Google+SDK相比，b4a在每个版本中都在改进，这可能存在一些限制。作为一个VB程序员，我更喜欢b4a，而不是学习java和做练习。正如Markus+stipp所说，如果Erel尝试合并mapview，这将非常适合支持许多应用程序。我希望Erel能很快做到这一点:)|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|4214095|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

My opinion is if you are familiar with VB, better to go for b4a. It is not wasting of money. May be some limitation compared to Google SDK b4a is improving in every version. Insteading of learning java and do the exercises being a VB programmer I prefer b4a. As Markus stipp states that If Erel try to incorporate mapview that would be great for supporting many applications.
 I hope Erel will do it shortly :)

blocks|key|2599373|text|b4a使用了一个非常“保持简单”和易于使用的界面|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|2599374|所以没有令人难以置信的复杂的.net所见即所得接口。|2599375|设计器本身有一个学习曲线，但它很容易学习。|2599376|另一个学习曲线是学习android设计中的“保持简单”的要点。|2599377|b4a有一个用于控件布局的抽象设计器，也可以在物理设备或仿真器上查看。|2599378|b4a现在包括一个所见即所得可视化设计器，可以在物理设备或仿真器上查看。|2599379|目前，开发人员使用的虚拟盒子模拟器与SDK和ADV管理器相比速度非常快。|2599380|使用虚拟盒子仿真器，我们可以为所有大小的设备创建仿真器。又快又容易。|2599381|有各种步步式初学者指南和初学者教程，以及简单和高级示例项目的控制教程。|2599382|以及一个非常活跃的初学者、中级和高级支持开发人员论坛。|2599383|在那里，你能想到的一切都已经被问过、讨论过和回答过了。|2599384|在那里，初学者可以在支持环境中感到安全，而不会像在其他论坛上那样粗鲁地感到疲惫。|2599385|其他定价过高的产品甚至连基本的安卓功能都还在苦苦挣扎，而b4a已经有了解决方案。简单易懂。|2599386|看看basic4android优惠券，你会发现职业执照上的价格低得离谱。没有每年过高的升级费用。|2599387|我所能建议的是，不要把.net+C%2B%2B+OO方法的包裹性思维带入未来。准备好在很短的时间内开发出真正的应用程序。|2599388|(是的好吧，我不想提的是b4a现在有类了。天哪！)|2599389|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|17|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|18|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|19|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|1A|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|1B|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|K|5|6|7|1C|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|L|3|M|5|6|7|1D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|N|3|O|5|6|7|1E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|P|3|Q|5|6|7|1F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|R|3|S|5|6|7|1G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|T|3|U|5|6|7|1H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|V|3|W|5|6|7|1I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|X|3|Y|5|6|7|1J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|Z|3|10|5|6|7|1K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|11|3|12|5|6|7|1L|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|13|3|14|5|6|7|1M|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|15|3|-4|5|6|7|1N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|16|$]]

b4a uses a very "keep it simple" and easy to use interface 

So does not have the incredibly complex .net wysiwyg interface.

There is a learning curve to the designer itself, but its easy to learn.

The other learning curve is learning the "keep it simple" consepts with android designs. 

b4a has an abstract designer for control layouts that can also be viewed on a physical device or an emulator.

b4a now includes a wysiwyg visual designer that can be viewed on a physical device or an emulator.

Currently developers use a virtual box emulator that is very fast in comparison to the SDK and ADV Manager.

Using the virtual box emulator we can create emulators for all sized devices. Quickly and easily.

There are all kinds of step-be-step beginners guides and beginners tutorials and control tutorials with simple and advanced sample projects. 

And a very active beginner, medium and advanced support developers forum. 

Where just about everything you could think of has already been asked, discussed and answered.

Where beginners can feel safe in a supporting environment without the rude burntout bullies you get in other forums.

Where other rediculously overpriced products are still stuggling to come to grips with even the basic Android features, b4a already has the solutions. That are simple and easy to understand.

Have a look around for basic4android coupons to find a rediculously low price on a professional licence. WITHOUT the yearly overpriced upgrade fees.

All I can suggest is not to bring .net C++ OO mehodologies baggage mindset into the future.
And be prepared to enjoy producing real apps in a very short time.

(yeah ok, I didn't want to mention is but b4a now has classes. jeez!)

blocks|key|2599301|text|我已经使用了这个软件，创建了大约三个用于工业控制系统监控的应用程序。就功能而言，B4A拥有一切。它发现它的局限性是普通用户可以使用的图形编辑能力。例如，要完全控制按钮的图形属性可能是非常困难的。一旦你创建了你的界面，你仍然无法看到最终的产品，直到你把它加载到模拟器(或设备)中，我想我们大多数人都知道它模拟HC3.0的速度有多慢。我理解从软件程序员的角度来看，实时呈现表单/活动可能非常困难，但当其他类似于B4A的程序开始出现时，它将帮助B4A保持其优势。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|2599302|尽管我在上面提出了批评，但这50美元是非常值得的。|2599303|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

I have used the software and created about three apps for industrial control system monitoring. B4A had it all as far as functionality is concerned. Where it finds its limitations are the graphical editing abilities avalible to the average user. It can be very difficult to have complete control over the graphical properties of a button for example. Once you have created you interface you still dont get to see the final product until you have loaded it into the emulator (or the device), and I think most of us know how slow it can be emulating HC 3.0. I understand that realtime rendering of the form/activity can be very difficult from the software programers point of view, but it will help B4A keep its edge as other programs similiar to B4A begin to pop up. 

Despite my critisims above it is well worth the 50$

blocks|key|529951|text|我是一个JAVA程序员与OCJP。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|529952|我已经完成了一篇关于原生JAVA+Android的大学论文，并在playstore上有一个游戏应用程序。|529953|现在，我必须为客户端编写一个应用程序。|529954|我使用B4A，而不是原生JAVA和eclipse，因为它更快、更容易。|529955|正如许多人上面所说的，唯一的缺点是它可能没有一些功能。|529956|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|M|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|O|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|-4|5|6|7|Q|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|K|$]]

I am a JAVA coder with OCJP.

I have done a university paper with native JAVA Android and have a game app on the playstore from that experience.

Right now I have to code an app for a client.

I am using B4A not native JAVA and eclipse because it is faster &amp; easier

As many have said above the only disadvantage is that it may not have some features.

I am currently researching the pros and cons about Basic4Android. I have a good list of pros (<a href="http://www.basic4ppc.com/android/why.html" rel="noreferrer">http://www.basic4ppc.com/android/why.html</a>) but what are some disadvantages to using this? What limitations does this tool have?

Thank-you for the help!

Disadvantages of using Basic4Android?

翻译质量差，导致语言生硬或混乱。

没有提供实际的解决方法或示例。

解答不清晰，无法理解或解决问题。

页面排版不美观，阅读体验差。

文章

问答

视频

教程

学习中心

腾讯云实验室

直播

竞赛

腾讯云代码分析专区

腾讯iOA零信任安全管理系统专区

腾讯云架构师技术同盟交流圈

腾讯云数据库专区

腾讯云智能顾问专区

腾讯云原生专区

腾讯混元专区

腾讯云TCE专区

腾讯云Lighthouse专区

腾讯云HAI专区

腾讯云Edgeone专区

腾讯云存储专区

腾讯云智能专区

腾讯轻联专区 

腾讯云开发专区

TAPD专区

腾讯轻量云游戏服专区

腾讯云最具价值专家

腾讯云架构师技术同盟

腾讯云创作之星

腾讯云开发者先锋

腾讯云AI代码助手

云原生构建

TAPD 敏捷项目管理

Cloud Studio

SDK中心

API中心

命令行工具

功能1上新10个字符

功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符。

功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符。

功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符

功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符

功能4上新

文章&问答评论现已支持表情

全新交互，全新视觉，新增快捷键、悬浮工具栏、高亮块等功能并同时优化现有功能，全面提升创作效率和体验

社区富文本编辑器全新改版！诚邀体验～ 

精选全网热门MCP server，让你的AI更好用 🚀

💥开发者 MCP广场重磅上线！

涵盖代码开发、场景应用、自动测试全流程，助你从零构建专属AI助手

一站式MCP教程库，解锁AI应用新玩法

聚焦“写作效率、视觉美观与运行性能”三方面进行全面升级，为您提供更高效、稳定的创作环境

社区富文本&Markdown编辑器全新改版上线，欢迎大家体验!

诚挚邀请您参与本次调研，分享您的真实使用感受与建议。您的反馈至关重要，感谢您的支持与参与！

社区新版编辑器体验调研

我目前正在研究Basic4Android的利弊。我有一个很好的优点列表()，但是使用它有什么缺点呢？这个工具有什么限制？谢谢你的帮助！

问使用Basic4Android的缺点是什么？
EN

回答 10

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问使用Basic4Android的缺点是什么？EN

回答 10

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问使用Basic4Android的缺点是什么？
EN