blocks|key|2878396|text|HTML5和CSS3是“随时可以使用的”--你需要学习一些“多层填充”的概念，但你可以让用户体验在所有浏览器中都非常相似，即使你在此过程中失去了一些过渡效果和圆角。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|2878397|我的网站自2009年以来一直是HTML5，我在很多很多浏览器上测试了它。|2878398|所以底线是，HTML5被设计成高度向后兼容HTML4.01，并且有许多技术可以使内容在不支持HTML5中更时髦的元素的旧浏览器中可用。|2878399|entityMap^0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$]]

HTML5 and CSS3 are "ready to use" - you need to learn a little about the concept of "Polyfilling", but you can make the user experience very similar in all browsers, even if you lose a few transition effects and rounded corners along the way.

My website has been HTML5 since 2009 and I tested it across many, many browsers.

So the bottom line is, HTML5 is designed to be highly backwards compatible with HTML4.01 and there are lots of techniques for making content available to older browsers that don't support the more funky elements in HTML5.

blocks|key|2594000|text|960网格系统将与HTML5和CSS3一起工作，因为它只是一个类列表。CSS3并没有真正为您提供任何网格布局特性，这些特性已经被广泛采用，足以对您有所帮助。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|2594001|我会尽可能多地使用CSS3和HTML5，但不要忘记渐进式增强。不要盲目地忽略浏览器，因为它不支持CSS3。您应该适当地使用HTML5和CSS3，而不是因为它很酷。|2594002|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

The 960 grid system will work with HTML5 and CSS3 because it's just a list of classes. CSS3 doesn't really give you any grid layout features yet that are widely adopted enough to be helpful.

I would use CSS3 and HTML5 as much as you can but don't forget about progressive enhancement. Don't blindly ignore a browser because it doesn't support CSS3. You should use HTML5 and CSS3 appropriately and not because it's cool.

blocks|key|2593894|text|你的设计目标是什么？你需要做个尖端人物吗？|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|2593895|我会说使用XHTML/CSS2，因为它将被支持多年，除非你需要其他的功能。|2593896|作为一个早期采用者可能是相当痛苦的，所以只有在你有很好的理由的情况下才这么做。|2593897|entityMap^0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$]]

What audience are you designing it for? Do you need to be bleeding edge?

I would say use XHTML/CSS2 as that will be supported for years unless you need the functionality in the others.

Being an early adopter can be quite painful, so only do that if you have good reasons to.

blocks|key|2878342|text|当然是Html5和css3！|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|2878343|您可能要问自己的唯一一件事是，您是否想要使用新元素(文章、旁白、导航等)。因为如果这样做，您需要依赖Javascript才能让IE正确呈现您的页面。|2878344|每个新页面都应该使用新的doctype+imo编写：|2878345|<!DOCTYPE+html>+|code-block|syntax|javascript|2878346|如果您想要一个在所有主流浏览器中都能很好地工作的起始模板，那么您可能需要查看以下内容：http://html5boilerplate.com/|offset|length|2878347|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://html5boilerplate.com/^0|0|0|0|0|17|S|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|W|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|X|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|Y|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|H|7|Z|8|@]|9|@]|A|$I|J]]|$1|K|3|L|5|6|7|10|8|@]|9|@$M|11|N|12|1|13]]|A|$]]|$1|O|3|-4|5|6|7|14|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|P|$Q|$5|R|S|T|A|$U|V]]]]

Html5 and css3 for sure! 

The only thing you might want to ask yourself is wether or not you want to use the new elements (article, aside, nav etc.) Because if you do, you need to depend on Javascript in order for IE to render your page correctly.

Every new page should be written with the new doctype imo:

<pre><code>&lt;!DOCTYPE html&gt; 
</code></pre>

If you want a starting template that works well in all major browsers you might want to check this out: <a href="http://html5boilerplate.com/" rel="nofollow">http://html5boilerplate.com/</a>

blocks|key|4667970|text|我完全同意Bravax的观点。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|4667971|这一切都是基于你的观众是谁。如果你想让你的网站处于最前沿，不管受众是什么，那就去做吧。|4667972|我听说过关于52framework的很棒的事情！我将把它应用到一个全面的100%2B页面站点重新设计中。它的好处是，它可以很好地配合IE+(即使是6!)。|offset|length|4667973|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.52framework.com/^0|0|0|6|B|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|Q|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@$F|S|G|T|1|U]]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|V|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|I|$J|$5|K|L|M|A|$N|O]]]]

Whole-heartedly agree with Bravax.

It's all really based on who your audience is. If you want your site to be on the bleeding edge, regardless of audience, go for it. 

I have heard great things about <a href="http://www.52framework.com/" rel="nofollow">52framework</a>! I am about to implement it into a full-on 100+ page site redesign. The good thing about it, is that it plays nice with IE (even 6!).

blocks|key|2878472|text|它完全与你所瞄准的市场有关。使用CSS3，您将能够拥有更多的交互式内容，并且更容易维护样式。也就是说，许多html5和css3元素还没有标准化。即使是在现代的、尖端的浏览器中，也可能存在重大差异。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|2878473|如果你是为了实验或玩耍而制作一个主题，我会使用更新的技术。|2878474|如果你做这个是为了在广泛的销售和潜在的销售中消费，你真的应该避免使用老浏览器不支持的技术，特别是IE7和8。|2878475|entityMap^0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$]]

It is entirely related to the markets you are aiming at. You will be able to have more interactive content and easier to maintain styles with CSS3. This said, many of the html5 and css3 elements are not yet standardized. Even among the modern, cutting-edge, browsers there can be major differences.

If you are making a theme for experimental purposes or to play around with, I would go with the newer technologies.

If you are making this for consumption on a wide sale, and potential sale, you really should avoid technologies not supported by older browers, IE 7 and 8 especially.

I'm going to develop a theme for a WordPress blog but I'm not sure if I should do it using XHTML/CSS2 or if I already can do it using HTML5/CSS3.

Usually, I use 960.gs framework but it isn't available with HTML5/CSS3. I've heard that the 52framework works fine as well and I'm thinking about adopt it for my project, but I'm really insecure about HTML5's early adoption (?).

Someone, please, can help me to decide which technology adopt on my project.

Thanks a lot.

Should I use XHTML/CSS2 or HTML5/CSS3 on my blog project?

翻译质量差，导致语言生硬或混乱。

没有提供实际的解决方法或示例。

解答不清晰，无法理解或解决问题。

页面排版不美观，阅读体验差。

文章

问答

视频

教程

学习中心

腾讯云实验室

直播

竞赛

腾讯云代码分析专区

腾讯iOA零信任安全管理系统专区

腾讯云架构师技术同盟交流圈

腾讯云数据库专区

腾讯云智能顾问专区

腾讯云原生专区

腾讯混元专区

腾讯云TCE专区

腾讯云Lighthouse专区

腾讯云HAI专区

腾讯云Edgeone专区

腾讯云存储专区

腾讯云智能专区

腾讯轻联专区 

腾讯云开发专区

TAPD专区

腾讯轻量云游戏服专区

EdgeOne AI 安全实战专区

腾讯云最具价值专家

腾讯云架构师技术同盟

腾讯云创作之星

腾讯云开发者先锋

腾讯云代码助手

云原生构建

TAPD 敏捷项目管理

Cloud Studio

SDK中心

API中心

命令行工具

涵盖代码开发、场景应用、自动测试全流程，助你从零构建专属AI助手

一站式MCP教程库，解锁AI应用新玩法

聚焦“写作效率、视觉美观与运行性能”三方面进行全面升级，为您提供更高效、稳定的创作环境

社区富文本&Markdown编辑器全新改版上线，欢迎大家体验!

诚挚邀请您参与本次调研，分享您的真实使用感受与建议。您的反馈至关重要，感谢您的支持与参与！

社区新版编辑器体验调研

我将为一个WordPress博客开发一个主题，但我不确定是否应该使用XHTML5/css2，或者我是否已经可以使用HTML5/CSS3。通常，我使用960.gs框架，但它在HTML5/CSS3中不可用。我听说52framework也工作得很好，我正在考虑在我的项目中采用它，但我对HTML5的早期采用真的很不放心(?)。有人，请，可以帮助我决定在我的项目中采用哪种技术。非常感谢。

问我应该在我的博客项目中使用XHTML/CSS2还是HTML5/CSS3？
EN

回答 6

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问我应该在我的博客项目中使用XHTML/CSS2还是HTML5/CSS3？EN

回答 6

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问我应该在我的博客项目中使用XHTML/CSS2还是HTML5/CSS3？
EN