blocks|key|4134789|text|在HTML5+specification中引用了一些WHATWG+Meta+Extension+proposals，它们可以满足页面的创建日期。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|4134790|"Accepted"+Proposals|style|BOLD|4134791|dcterms.available+-资源可用的日期。|CODE|4134792|dcterms.created+-资源的创建日期。|4134793|dcterms.dateAccepted+-接受资源的日期。|4134794|dcterms.submitted+-提交资源的日期。|4134795|dcterms.issued+-资源的发布日期。|4134796|Related+"Accepted"+Proposals|4134797|dcterms.modified+-资源的修改日期|4134798|dcterms.valid+-资源的有效性。|4134799|有几个“不完整的提案”由于缺乏文档(如created)而没有被接受。|4134800|我不认为dc.date的Hangy's+answer+(现在的dcterms.date)在这里是相关的，因为据我所知，这是与资源相关的日期。例如，如果资源是关于1066年黑斯廷斯战役的讨论，则dcterms.date可以设置为1066。同样的道理也适用于icas.datetime。|4134801|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/document-metadata.html#concept-meta-extensions|1|http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/MetaExtensions|2|http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/#terms-available|3|http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/#terms-created|4|http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/#terms-dateAccepted|5|http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/#terms-dateSubmitted|6|http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/#terms-issued|7|http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/#terms-modified|8|http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/#terms-valid|9|https://stackoverflow.com/a/4576005/1317805^0|1|J|0|Q|V|1|0|0|A|B|9|0|0|H|0|H|2|0|0|F|0|F|3|0|0|K|0|K|4|0|0|H|0|H|5|0|0|E|0|E|6|0|0|7|8|A|J|9|0|0|G|0|G|7|0|0|D|0|D|8|0|J|7|0|4|7|V|C|2O|C|3J|D|C|E|9|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|1S|8|@]|9|@$A|1T|B|1U|1|1V]|$A|1W|B|1X|1|1Y]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|1Z|8|@$A|20|B|21|F|G]|$A|22|B|23|F|G]]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|24|8|@$A|25|B|26|F|J]]|9|@$A|27|B|28|1|29]]|C|$]]|$1|K|3|L|5|6|7|2A|8|@$A|2B|B|2C|F|J]]|9|@$A|2D|B|2E|1|2F]]|C|$]]|$1|M|3|N|5|6|7|2G|8|@$A|2H|B|2I|F|J]]|9|@$A|2J|B|2K|1|2L]]|C|$]]|$1|O|3|P|5|6|7|2M|8|@$A|2N|B|2O|F|J]]|9|@$A|2P|B|2Q|1|2R]]|C|$]]|$1|Q|3|R|5|6|7|2S|8|@$A|2T|B|2U|F|J]]|9|@$A|2V|B|2W|1|2X]]|C|$]]|$1|S|3|T|5|6|7|2Y|8|@$A|2Z|B|30|F|G]|$A|31|B|32|F|G]|$A|33|B|34|F|G]]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|U|3|V|5|6|7|35|8|@$A|36|B|37|F|J]]|9|@$A|38|B|39|1|3A]]|C|$]]|$1|W|3|X|5|6|7|3B|8|@$A|3C|B|3D|F|J]]|9|@$A|3E|B|3F|1|3G]]|C|$]]|$1|Y|3|Z|5|6|7|3H|8|@$A|3I|B|3J|F|J]]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|10|3|11|5|6|7|3K|8|@$A|3L|B|3M|F|J]|$A|3N|B|3O|F|J]|$A|3P|B|3Q|F|J]|$A|3R|B|3S|F|J]]|9|@$A|3T|B|3U|1|3V]]|C|$]]|$1|12|3|-4|5|6|7|3W|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|13|$14|$5|15|16|17|C|$18|19]]|1A|$5|15|16|17|C|$18|1B]]|1C|$5|15|16|17|C|$18|1D]]|1E|$5|15|16|17|C|$18|1F]]|1G|$5|15|16|17|C|$18|1H]]|1I|$5|15|16|17|C|$18|1J]]|1K|$5|15|16|17|C|$18|1L]]|1M|$5|15|16|17|C|$18|1N]]|1O|$5|15|16|17|C|$18|1P]]|1Q|$5|15|16|17|C|$18|1R]]]]

There have been a few <a href="http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/MetaExtensions" rel="noreferrer">WHATWG Meta Extension proposals</a>, referenced in the <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/document-metadata.html#concept-meta-extensions" rel="noreferrer">HTML5 specification</a> which could cater for the creation date of a page.

"Accepted" Proposals 
<a href="http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/#terms-available" rel="noreferrer"><code>dcterms.available</code></a> - The date the resource became available. 
<a href="http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/#terms-created" rel="noreferrer"><code>dcterms.created</code></a> - The creation date of the resource. 
<a href="http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/#terms-dateAccepted" rel="noreferrer"><code>dcterms.dateAccepted</code></a> - The date the resource was accepted. 
<a href="http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/#terms-dateSubmitted" rel="noreferrer"><code>dcterms.submitted</code></a> - The date the resource was submitted. 
<a href="http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/#terms-issued" rel="noreferrer"><code>dcterms.issued</code></a> - The publication date of a resource. 

Related "Accepted" Proposals 
<a href="http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/#terms-modified" rel="noreferrer"><code>dcterms.modified</code></a> - The modification date of a resource 
<a href="http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/#terms-valid" rel="noreferrer"><code>dcterms.valid</code></a> - The validity of the resource.

There are a couple of "incomplete proposals" which haven't been accepted due to a lack of documentation (such as <code>created</code>).

I don't believe <a href="https://stackoverflow.com/a/4576005/1317805">Hangy's answer</a> of <code>dc.date</code> (now <code>dcterms.date</code>) would be relevant here as, as far as I'm lead to believe, the date of this is the date associated with the resource. For example, if the resource was a discussion about the Battle of Hastings in 1066, the <code>dcterms.date</code> could be set to 1066. The same could also be said for <code>icas.datetime</code>.

blocks|key|1584386|text|这不是一个标准，但我记得我读过一篇关于RDFa的文章。它，或其他形式的微格式化，可能正是您正在寻找的解决方案。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1584387|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.alistapart.com/articles/introduction-to-rdfa/^0|J|4|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

It's not a standard, but I remember reading on A List Apart about <a href="http://www.alistapart.com/articles/introduction-to-rdfa/" rel="noreferrer">RDFa</a>. It, or other forms of microformatting, may just be the solution you're looking for.

blocks|key|2537954|text|我想DC.date标签可以用来做这件事。Dublin+Core元数据相对成熟且广为人知。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|offset|length|style|CODE|entityRanges|data|2537955|你也可以用XMDP标记你的网站，它有一个日期标签，应该是最后一次修改的日期。|2537956|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://dublincore.org/documents/dcq-html/|1|http://gmpg.org/xmdp/^0|2|7|2|7|0|0|5|4|1|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|R|8|@$9|S|A|T|B|C]]|D|@$9|U|A|V|1|W]]|E|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|X|8|@]|D|@$9|Y|A|Z|1|10]]|E|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|11|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]]|I|$J|$5|K|L|M|E|$N|O]]|P|$5|K|L|M|E|$N|Q]]]]

I suppose the <a href="http://dublincore.org/documents/dcq-html/" rel="noreferrer"><code>DC.date</code></a> tag could be used for that. The Dublin Core metadata is relatively established and well known.

You could also mark your websites with <a href="http://gmpg.org/xmdp/" rel="noreferrer">XMDP</a>, which has a date tag that is supposed to be the date of the last modification.

blocks|key|2537977|text|你可以像James和hangy建议的那样尝试RDFa+(或微格式)，Google通过一个叫做Rich+Snippets的特性来支持它们。使用富片段测试工具来查看它是如何工作的-例如，它确实从用hreview标记的one+of+my+blog+posts中提取dtreviewed和评级。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|offset|length|style|CODE|entityRanges|data|2537978|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=99170|1|http://microformats.org/wiki/hreview|2|http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/richsnippets?url=http%253A%252F%252Fwww.boogdesign.com%252Fb2evo%252Findex.php%252Flws-may-accessible-design%253Fblog%253D2&view=^0|3L|A|1A|D|0|2O|7|1|2Y|K|2|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|R|8|@$9|S|A|T|B|C]]|D|@$9|U|A|V|1|W]|$9|X|A|Y|1|Z]|$9|10|A|11|1|12]]|E|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|13|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|E|$L|M]]|N|$5|I|J|K|E|$L|O]]|P|$5|I|J|K|E|$L|Q]]]]

You could try RDFa (or Microformats) as James and hangy have suggested, Google supports them through a feature called <a href="http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=99170" rel="nofollow">Rich Snippets</a>. Use the Rich Snippets Testing Tool to see how it's working - for example it does pick up the <code>dtreviewed</code> and the rating from <a href="http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/richsnippets?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.boogdesign.com%2Fb2evo%2Findex.php%2Flws-may-accessible-design%3Fblog%3D2&amp;view=" rel="nofollow">one of my blog posts</a> which is marked up with <a href="http://microformats.org/wiki/hreview" rel="nofollow">hreview</a>.

blocks|key|1584427|text|对于标记内容，您可以使用microdata的HTML5路径。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1584428|我也在为同样的问题而苦苦挣扎--谷歌可以计算出我网站上某些内容的日期，但其他内容就不行了。我想帮助它，这样它就可以随时获得文章上的日期。|1584429|我正在尝试上面建议的"dc.date“元标签的组合，并使用微数据标记页面上出现的时间戳。|1584430|Google关于如何使用微数据标记时间戳的示例如下：|1584431|<time+itemprop="startDate"+datetime="2009-10-15T19:00-08:00">15+October+2009,+7PM</time>|code-block|syntax|javascript|1584432|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=176035^0|C|9|0|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|W|8|@]|9|@$A|X|B|Y|1|Z]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|10|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|11|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|12|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|J|3|K|5|L|7|13|8|@]|9|@]|C|$M|N]]|$1|O|3|-4|5|6|7|14|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|P|$Q|$5|R|S|T|C|$U|V]]]]

For marking content, you can go the HTML5 route of <a href="http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=176035" rel="nofollow">microdata</a>.

I'm struggling with the same question - google can figure out dates on some content on my site, but not others. I want to help it, so it can always get the date on the article. 

I'm trying a combination of the "dc.date" metatag suggested above, and marking up the timestamp that appears on the page using microdata. 

Google's example of how to mark up your timestamps using microdata is:

<pre><code>&lt;time itemprop="startDate" datetime="2009-10-15T19:00-08:00"&gt;15 October 2009, 7PM&lt;/time&gt;
</code></pre>

One thing that search engines really suck with is the date when a website was created. You know the problem: You search for some CSS or JavaScript problem and Google returns a ton of results from 2002 explaining how to fix the problem in IE 5.5 and Netscape 4.6 while the helpful articles are buried on Page 3.

Anyway, I just wonder if there is a standardized or at least generally accepted tag or meta tag that I can put on my own pages to indicate the date they were created?

Not that it helps filtering out the old crap out of search results (especially since the people at #1 with their 2002 articles have zero incentive to change), but I'd just like to do my part :P

Is there a standardized (meta?) tag for the date of a website?

翻译质量差，导致语言生硬或混乱。

没有提供实际的解决方法或示例。

解答不清晰，无法理解或解决问题。

页面排版不美观，阅读体验差。

文章

问答

视频

教程

学习中心

腾讯云实验室

直播

竞赛

腾讯云代码分析专区

腾讯iOA零信任安全管理系统专区

腾讯云架构师技术同盟交流圈

腾讯云数据库专区

腾讯云智能顾问专区

腾讯云原生专区

腾讯混元专区

腾讯云TCE专区

腾讯云Lighthouse专区

腾讯云HAI专区

腾讯云Edgeone专区

腾讯云存储专区

腾讯云智能专区

腾讯轻联专区 

腾讯云开发专区

TAPD专区

腾讯轻量云游戏服专区

腾讯云最具价值专家

腾讯云架构师技术同盟

腾讯云创作之星

腾讯云开发者先锋

腾讯云AI代码助手

云原生构建

TAPD 敏捷项目管理

Cloud Studio

SDK中心

API中心

命令行工具

功能1上新10个字符

功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符。

功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符。

功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符

功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符

功能4上新

文章&问答评论现已支持表情

全新交互，全新视觉，新增快捷键、悬浮工具栏、高亮块等功能并同时优化现有功能，全面提升创作效率和体验

社区富文本编辑器全新改版！诚邀体验～ 

精选全网热门MCP server，让你的AI更好用 🚀

💥开发者 MCP广场重磅上线！

涵盖代码开发、场景应用、自动测试全流程，助你从零构建专属AI助手

一站式MCP教程库，解锁AI应用新玩法

聚焦“写作效率、视觉美观与运行性能”三方面进行全面升级，为您提供更高效、稳定的创作环境

社区富文本&Markdown编辑器全新改版上线，欢迎大家体验!

诚挚邀请您参与本次调研，分享您的真实使用感受与建议。您的反馈至关重要，感谢您的支持与参与！

社区新版编辑器体验调研

搜索引擎最不擅长的一件事就是网站创建的日期。你知道问题所在:你搜索一些CSS或JavaScript问题，谷歌会返回一大堆2002年的结果，解释如何在IE5.5和Netscape 4.6中修复这个问题，而有用的文章却被埋在了第3页。无论如何，我只是想知道是否有一个标准化的或至少是普遍接受的标签或元标签，我可以放在我自己的页面上，以表明它们的创建日期？这并不是说它有助于过滤掉搜索结果中的旧垃圾(特别是

问有没有标准化的(元数据？)标记一个网站的日期？
EN

回答 5

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问有没有标准化的(元数据？)标记一个网站的日期？EN

回答 5

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问有没有标准化的(元数据？)标记一个网站的日期？
EN