有人能解释一下吗?
"A using-declaration in a derived class cannot refer to a specialization
of a template conversion function in a base class."它来自ISO C++标准..14.5.2,第7点
发布于 2010-08-16 21:36:57
这意味着这是病态的:
struct A { template<typename T> operator T(); };
struct B : A { using A::operator int; }; // ill-formed: refers to specialization同样,对于其他函数模板专门化(不仅仅是转换函数)
struct A { template<typename T> void f(); };
struct B : A { using A::f<int>; }; // ill-formed: refers to specialization发布于 2010-08-16 21:30:51
2.)
Q: My compiler says that a member of a base class template is not defined in a derived class template. Why is it not inherited?
template<typename T>
class base {
public:
void base_func();
};
template<typename T>
class derived : public base<T> {
public:
void derived_func()
{
base_func(); // error: base_func not defined
}
};
A:
It is inherited.
However, the standard says that unqualified names in a template are generally non-dependent and must be looked up when the template is defined.
Since the definition of a dependent base class is not known at that time (there may be specialisations of the base class template that have not yet been seen),
unqualified names are never resolved to members of the dependent base class.
Where names in the template are supposed to refer to base class members or to indirect base classes,
they can either be made dependent by qualifying them or brought into the template's scope with a using-declaration.
In the example, this could be achieved by replacing the call to base_func() with this->base_func() or base<T>::base_func(), or by adding the declaration using base<T>::base_func;.我从这个页面得到的是,要将来自父模板类的函数引入到类中,你必须使用using -声明,它看起来像base<T>::base_func(),ISO标准规定你不能使用像这个base<int>::base_func()这样的using声明。不同之处在于<>。
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3493332
复制相似问题