blocks|key|3767756|text|编译与“解释”本质上是实现的问题，而不是语言本身。例如，解释MRI+Ruby1.8，而将MacRuby编译为本机代码。两者都包含一个交互式REPL。我所知道的所有语言都至少有一个机器代码编译器和至少一个REPL：|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|3767757|3767758|Ruby|unordered-list-item|3767759|Python|3767760|Almost+all+Lisp+(Lisp是开创这种技术的语言，AFAIK)|3767761|OCaml|3767762|Haskell|3767763|Forth|3767764|3767765|如果我们将编译计算为字节码和机器码，那么绝大多数流行的字节码编译语言都是如此：|3767766|3767767|Java|3767768|Scala|3767769|Groovy|3767770|Erlang|3767771|C#|3767772|F#|3767773|Smalltalk|3767774|3767775|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Read%25E2%2580%2593eval%25E2%2580%2593print_loop^0|1X|4|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|1I|8|@]|9|@$A|1J|B|1K|1|1L]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|1M|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|E|3|F|5|G|7|1N|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|G|7|1O|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|J|3|K|5|G|7|1P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|L|3|M|5|G|7|1Q|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|N|3|O|5|G|7|1R|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|P|3|Q|5|G|7|1S|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|R|3|-4|5|6|7|1T|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|S|3|T|5|6|7|1U|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|U|3|-4|5|6|7|1V|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|V|3|W|5|G|7|1W|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|X|3|Y|5|G|7|1X|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|Z|3|10|5|G|7|1Y|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|11|3|12|5|G|7|1Z|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|13|3|14|5|G|7|20|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|15|3|16|5|G|7|21|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|17|3|18|5|G|7|22|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|19|3|-4|5|6|7|23|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|1A|3|-4|5|6|7|24|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|1B|$1C|$5|1D|1E|1F|C|$1G|1H]]]]

Compilation vs. "interpretation" is essentially a matter of implementation, not the language itself. For example, MRI Ruby 1.8 is interpreted, while MacRuby is compiled to native machine code. Both include an interactive <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Read%E2%80%93eval%E2%80%93print_loop" rel="nofollow noreferrer">REPL</a>. All the languages I know that have at least one machine-code compiler and at least one REPL:

<ul>
<li>Ruby</li>
<li>Python</li>
<li>Almost all Lisps (Lisp was the language that pioneered this technique, AFAIK)</li>
<li>OCaml</li>
<li>Haskell</li>
<li>Forth</li>
</ul>

If we're counting compilation to bytecode as well as machine code, it's true of the vast majority of popular bytecode-compiled languages:

<ul>
<li>Java</li>
<li>Scala</li>
<li>Groovy</li>
<li>Erlang</li>
<li>C#</li>
<li>F#</li>
<li>Smalltalk</li>
</ul>

blocks|key|2359478|text|Haskell，使用具有称为GHCi的交互式“外壳”的Glasgow+Haskell+Compiler。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|2359479|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.haskell.org/ghc/^0|R|O|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

Haskell, using the <a href="http://www.haskell.org/ghc/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Glasgow Haskell Compiler</a> which has an interactive "shell" called GHCi.

blocks|key|696342|text|许多版本的Lisp都提供了这两个选项，包括Clojure。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|696343|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

Many flavors of Lisp offer both options, including Clojure.

blocks|key|1441414|text|我想到了两个:+ocaml和scala+(~=+java)，但我相信肯定还有更多。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1441415|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

Two come to my mind : ocaml and scala (~= java), but I'm sure there must be a lot more out there.

blocks|key|698244|text|这是另一个烧掉你房子的方法：|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|698245|x86程序集|698246|是的，这里也有相应的解释器。|698247|698248|Javascript+x86+Assembly+Interpreter|unordered-list-item|offset|length|698249|Jasmin|698250|698251|在这一点上，您实际上是在仿真器的土地上，但它确实满足您所陈述的需求。|698252|我想知道，如果没有人拼凑出一个可用的解释器，那么命名编译语言是否更容易一些。:-)|698253|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://timhatch.com/projects/jsassembly/|1|http://cboard.cprogramming.com/tech-board/107937-x86-assembly-emulator.html^0|0|0|0|0|0|Z|0|0|0|6|1|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|12|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|13|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|14|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|15|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|G|3|H|5|I|7|16|8|@]|9|@$J|17|K|18|1|19]]|A|$]]|$1|L|3|M|5|I|7|1A|8|@]|9|@$J|1B|K|1C|1|1D]]|A|$]]|$1|N|3|-4|5|6|7|1E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|O|3|P|5|6|7|1F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|Q|3|R|5|6|7|1G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|S|3|-4|5|6|7|1H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|T|$U|$5|V|W|X|A|$Y|Z]]|10|$5|V|W|X|A|$Y|11]]]]

And here's another one to burn your house down:

x86 Assembly

Yup, there are interpreters for this as well.

<ul>
<li><a href="http://timhatch.com/projects/jsassembly/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Javascript x86 Assembly Interpreter</a></li>
<li><a href="http://cboard.cprogramming.com/tech-board/107937-x86-assembly-emulator.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Jasmin</a></li>
</ul>

At this point you're really in emulator land, but it does meet the requirements you state.

I'm wondering if it's easier to name compiled languages that someone hasn't cobbled up a working interpreter for. :-)

blocks|key|2359564|text|Lua有一个用于一行程序和实验的交互模式。它通常会编译成其VM的字节码以供执行。LuaJIT是Lua的独立实现，它还可以对32位x86进行实时编译。对64位的支持正在进行中，并且经常请求对ARM的支持。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|2359565|编译成字节码通常是纯解释器和纯编译器之间的一种合理的折衷。VM可以根据语言的需要进行调整，JIT技术可以在VM代码执行时对其进行分析，并将精力集中在频繁执行的代码路径和内部循环上。|2359566|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.lua.org/|1|http://luajit.org/^0|0|3|0|14|6|1|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@$A|Q|B|R|1|S]|$A|T|B|U|1|V]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|W|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|X|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|M]]|N|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|O]]]]

<a href="http://www.lua.org/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Lua</a> has an interactive mode for one-liners and experimentation. It normally compiles to bytecode for its VM for execution. <a href="http://luajit.org/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">LuaJIT</a> is an independent implementation of a Lua VM that also does just-in-time compilation to 32-bit x86. Support for 64-bit is underway, and support for ARM is frequently requested.

Compilation to a bytecode is often a reasonable compromise between a pure interpreter and a pure compiler. The VM can be tuned to the needs of the language, and JIT techniques can analyze the VM code as it executes and concentrate on frequently executed code paths and inner loops.

blocks|key|2359682|text|正如其他人所提到的，OCaml。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|2359683|如果托管代码(.NET命令行界面)足够接近机器代码，那么F#也将是一个候选。可能还有其他的.NET/Mono语言也符合这个要求。|2359684|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

As others have mentioned, OCaml.

If managed code (.NET CLI) is close enough to machine code, F# would be a candidate as well. There are probably other .NET/Mono languages which meet the requirement as well.

blocks|key|1444867|text|你可能会后悔你问了：|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1444868|C和C%2B%2B。|1444869|为什么？|1444870|1444871|Ch|unordered-list-item|offset|length|1444872|CINT|1444873|EIC|1444874|picocc|1444875|1444876|而且可能还有其他人在那里。|1444877|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.softintegration.com/|1|http://root.cern.ch/drupal/content/cint|2|http://sourceforge.net/projects/eic/|3|http://code.google.com/p/picoc/^0|0|0|0|0|0|2|0|0|0|4|1|0|0|3|2|0|0|6|3|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|18|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|19|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|1A|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|1B|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|G|3|H|5|I|7|1C|8|@]|9|@$J|1D|K|1E|1|1F]]|A|$]]|$1|L|3|M|5|I|7|1G|8|@]|9|@$J|1H|K|1I|1|1J]]|A|$]]|$1|N|3|O|5|I|7|1K|8|@]|9|@$J|1L|K|1M|1|1N]]|A|$]]|$1|P|3|Q|5|I|7|1O|8|@]|9|@$J|1P|K|1Q|1|1R]]|A|$]]|$1|R|3|-4|5|6|7|1S|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|S|3|T|5|6|7|1T|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|U|3|-4|5|6|7|1U|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|V|$W|$5|X|Y|Z|A|$10|11]]|12|$5|X|Y|Z|A|$10|13]]|14|$5|X|Y|Z|A|$10|15]]|16|$5|X|Y|Z|A|$10|17]]]]

You may regret you asked:

C and C++.

Why?

<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.softintegration.com/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Ch</a></li>
<li><a href="http://root.cern.ch/drupal/content/cint" rel="nofollow noreferrer">CINT</a></li>
<li><a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/eic/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">EIC</a></li>
<li><a href="http://code.google.com/p/picoc/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">picocc</a></li>
</ul>

and there are probably others out there as well.

blocks|key|698227|text|许多语言都提供了一种既能交互又能编译成机器码的实现，但很少能同时做到这两点。Standard+ML+of+New+Jersey有一个交互式循环，但没有字节码:它只是在内存中编译成机器码，然后转移到机器码。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|698228|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.smlnj.org/^0|12|P|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

Plenty of languages offer an implementation that both interacts and compiles to machine code, but it's rare to do both at once. <a href="http://www.smlnj.org/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Standard ML of New Jersey</a> is one that has an interactive loop but no bytecode: it simply compiles to machine code in memory and then branches to it.

blocks|key|1441381|text|不完全是机器码，但Java可以编译，也可以通过BeanShell使用。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1441382|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.beanshell.org/^0|N|9|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

Not exactly machine code, but Java can be compiled and also used via <a href="http://www.beanshell.org/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">BeanShell</a>.

blocks|key|1441388|text|我使用过带有解释器的Ruby，似乎有一个编译器here。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1441389|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.erikveen.dds.nl/rubyscript2exe/^0|N|4|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

I've used Ruby with an interpreter, and there seems to be a compiler <a href="http://www.erikveen.dds.nl/rubyscript2exe/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">here</a>.

blocks|key|2359402|text|图标曾经有一个编译器，但它时好时坏。它可能仍然有效。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|2359403|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

Icon used to have a compiler, but it falls in and out of maintenence. It may still work.

blocks|key|3767659|text|Python可以编译成windows可执行文件。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|3767660|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

Python can be compiled to windows executables.

blocks|key|1441453|text|可以使用SnippetCompiler编译C#，也许这可以作为一个交互式解释器？|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1441454|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.sliver.com/dotnet/SnippetCompiler/^0|4|F|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

C# can be compiled by using <a href="http://www.sliver.com/dotnet/SnippetCompiler/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">SnippetCompiler</a>, maybe this would act as an interactive interpreter for you?

blocks|key|1444808|text|你的问题有点含糊。甚至连Java都适合它：|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1444809|1444810|指的是交互式解释器，我指的是类似外壳的环境，在这种环境中，你可以在运行时交互地工作。|blockquote|1444811|1444812|1444813|Java有这个功能，例如在Eclipse的“剪贴簿页面”中，您可以输入Java表达式并立即计算它们。当然，Java也是一种编译语言(虽然它通常被编译成字节码，但有各种编译器可以输出机器代码)。|1444814|那么你在找什么呢？也许你可以解释一下你的问题或兴趣。|1444815|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|O|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|C|3|D|5|E|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|Q|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|G|3|-4|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|K|5|6|7|T|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|L|3|-4|5|6|7|U|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|M|$]]

Your question is a bit vague. Even Java would fit it:

<blockquote>
 by interactive interpreter, i mean
 shell-like environment, where you can
 work in the runtime interactively.
</blockquote>

Java has this, e.g. in the Eclipse "scrapbook pages", where you can enter Java expressions and have them evaluated right away. Java is of course also a compiled language (and while it's usually compiled to bytecode, there are various compilers that output machine code).

So what are you looking for? Maybe you could explain your problem or interest.

blocks|key|3767922|text|我试着使用mono/.net一段时间，发现随机的GC暂停是令人不快的(至少在我的老式笔记本电脑上是这样)。我考虑过使用gambit-c，一个可以编译成C语言的方案的实现，但它似乎很难使用，因为文档有一定的限制，而且包也不是很容易安装和使用。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|3767923|我通常只是坚持让一种解释型语言，比如python绑定到C/C%2B%2B，这是比较痛苦的，但至少我知道我在做什么。|3767924|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

I tried using mono/.net for a bit and found random GC pauses to be disagreeable (at least on my crusty old laptop). I looked at using gambit-c an implementation of scheme that can compile to C but it seemed difficult to work with because the docs were somewhat limited and the packages where not very easy to install and use.

I usually just stick to having an interpreted language such as python bound to C/C++ which is more painful but at least I know what I am in for.

Is there a programming language, having usable interactive interpreter, even as it can be compiled to machine code?

Compiled interpreted language

翻译质量差，导致语言生硬或混乱。

没有提供实际的解决方法或示例。

解答不清晰，无法理解或解决问题。

页面排版不美观，阅读体验差。

文章

问答

视频

教程

学习中心

腾讯云实验室

直播

竞赛

腾讯云代码分析专区

腾讯iOA零信任安全管理系统专区

腾讯云架构师技术同盟交流圈

腾讯云数据库专区

腾讯云智能顾问专区

腾讯云原生专区

腾讯混元专区

腾讯云TCE专区

腾讯云Lighthouse专区

腾讯云HAI专区

腾讯云Edgeone专区

腾讯云存储专区

腾讯云智能专区

腾讯轻联专区 

腾讯云开发专区

TAPD专区

腾讯轻量云游戏服专区

腾讯云最具价值专家

腾讯云架构师技术同盟

腾讯云创作之星

腾讯云开发者先锋

腾讯云AI代码助手

云原生构建

TAPD 敏捷项目管理

Cloud Studio

SDK中心

API中心

命令行工具

功能1上新10个字符

功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符。

功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符。

功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符

功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符

功能4上新

文章&问答评论现已支持表情

全新交互，全新视觉，新增快捷键、悬浮工具栏、高亮块等功能并同时优化现有功能，全面提升创作效率和体验

社区富文本编辑器全新改版！诚邀体验～ 

精选全网热门MCP server，让你的AI更好用 🚀

💥开发者 MCP广场重磅上线！

涵盖代码开发、场景应用、自动测试全流程，助你从零构建专属AI助手

一站式MCP教程库，解锁AI应用新玩法

聚焦“写作效率、视觉美观与运行性能”三方面进行全面升级，为您提供更高效、稳定的创作环境

社区富文本&Markdown编辑器全新改版上线，欢迎大家体验!

诚挚邀请您参与本次调研，分享您的真实使用感受与建议。您的反馈至关重要，感谢您的支持与参与！

社区新版编辑器体验调研

有没有一种编程语言，即使它可以编译成机器代码，也有可用的交互式解释器？

问编译解释语言
EN

回答 16

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问编译解释语言EN

回答 16

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问编译解释语言
EN