我尝试用下面的代码在Rails中测试我的更新操作:
context "on PUT to :update" do
setup do
@countdown = Factory(:countdown)
@new_countdown = Factory.stub(:countdown)
put :update, :id => @countdown.id, :name => @new_countdown.name, :end => @new_countdown.end
end
should_respond_with :redirect
should_redirect_to("the countdowns view") { countdown_url(assigns(:countdown)) }
should_assign_to :countdown
should_set_the_flash_to /updated/i
should "save :countdown with new attributes" do
@countdown = Countdown.find(@countdown.id)
assert_equal @new_countdown.name, @countdown.name
assert_equal 0, (@new_countdown.end - @countdown.end).to_i
end
end当我实际使用构建的scaffold完成更新过程时,它可以很好地更新记录,但测试给出了这个错误:
1) Failure:
test: on PUT to :update should save :countdown with new attributes. (CountdownsControllerTest)
[/test/functional/countdowns_controller_test.rb:86:in `__bind_1276353837_121269'
/Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/thoughtbot-shoulda-2.10.2/lib/shoulda/context.rb:351:in `call'
/Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/thoughtbot-shoulda-2.10.2/lib/shoulda/context.rb:351:in `test: on PUT to :update should save :countdown with new attributes. ']:
<"Countdown 8"> expected but was
<"Countdown 7">.发布于 2010-08-19 10:13:46
我本以为那些end专栏会搞砸ruby,但看起来并没有...?
不管怎样,我假设/test/functional/countdowns_controller_test.rb:86就是这个断言:assert_equal @new_countdown.name, @countdown.name。
所以你的断言是问@new_countdown.name和@countdown.name是一样的吗?打开工厂看看,我想这是个简单的答案。不确定您在这里尝试测试的是什么。
另外,为什么@countdown = Countdown.find(@countdown.id)使用相同的实例变量名?设置中的@countdown与测试中find行中的@countdown不是相同的吗?
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3029028
复制相似问题