blocks|key|1253815|text|如果你正在为客户开发软件，那么你/你的公司和客户/他们的公司之间就有一份合同。这是合同的双方当事人。其他任何人，不受合同约束，都是第三方。它用于双方之间存在合同的地方，指的是任何不受合同约束的人。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1253816|对于哪一方是“第一”，哪一方是“第二”没有固定的含义，通常你会认为你是第一方，客户是第二方，而客户会认为他们是第一方，你是第二方，就像第一、第二和第三人称我/他/他们一样。|1253817|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

If you are developing software for a client, then there is a contract between you/your company, and the client/their company. These are the two parties to the contract. Anyone else, not bound by the contract, is a third party. It's used wherever a contract exists between two parties to mean anyone not bound by the contract. 

There is no fixed meaning to which of the two parties is 'first' and which 'second', usually you will think you're the first party, and the client the second, whereas the client will think they are the first party and you the second, in a similar fashion to first, second and third person I/he/they.

blocks|key|1253902|text|当谈到语法(英语语法或其他语言的语法)时，这些术语在英语中有很好的定义。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1253903|1253904|第一人称对应于代词“我”和“我们”；“我”和“我们”(所以用第一人称写的书是由中心人物讲述的故事--“我做了这件事”，而不是“史密斯做了这件事”)。|unordered-list-item|1253905|第二人称对应于代词“你”。|1253906|第三人称对应于代词“他”、“她”、“它”和“他们”；“他”、“她”和“他们”。|1253907|1253908|所以“第三方”不是指你或我，而是他们。|1253909|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|O|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|C|3|D|5|E|7|Q|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|E|7|R|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|E|7|S|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|-4|5|6|7|T|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|K|3|L|5|6|7|U|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|M|3|-4|5|6|7|V|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|N|$]]

These terms are well defined in English when talking about grammar (English grammar or another language's).

<ul>
<li>First person corresponds to the
pronouns "I" and "we"; "me" and "us" (so a book written in the first person is a story told by the central character - "I did this" as opposed to "Smith did this").</li>
<li>Second person corresponds to the
pronoun "you".</li>
<li>Third person
corresponds to the pronouns" he",
"she", "it" and "they"; "him", "her"
and "them".</li>
</ul>

So "third party" just means not you or me, but them.

blocks|key|3384190|text|第一方=i|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|3384191|第二方=你|3384192|第三方=他/她(即对话之外的人)|3384193|entityMap^0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$]]

1st party = I

2nd party = you

3rd party = he/she (i.e. someone external to the conversation)

blocks|key|1976345|text|让我们以Iphone为例。苹果以其硬件和软件是第一方。像我这样的终端用户，你是第二方。第三方是进入这种关系的人，就像影响我和苹果的应用程序开发人员一样。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1976346|注：第一方和第二方可以互换。|offset|length|style|BOLD|1976347|entityMap^0|0|0|2|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|K|8|@$D|L|E|M|F|G]]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|I|$]]

Let's take Iphone for example. 
Apple by its hardware and software are first party.
End user like me and you are the second party .
the third party is the person who enter this relation like an app developer 
that effect me and apple .

Note: the first and second party can be swapped .

blocks|key|1253781|text|第一方:+developers|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1253782|Second方:最终用户(我认为)|unordered-list-item|1253783|第三方:库等由开发人员以外的其他人提供。PDFSharp将被视为第三方。|1253784|1253785|1253786|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|D|7|L|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|E|3|F|5|D|7|M|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|G|3|-4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|O|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|I|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|J|$]]

<ul>
<li>First party: developers</li>
<li>Second party: end users (I think)</li>
<li>Third party: Libraries etc provided
by someone else other than the
developers. PDFSharp will be
considered 3rd party.</li>
</ul>

blocks|key|505566|text|我不认为第一方和第二方在编程中使用得太多。如果有人开始谈论工作中的第一方和第二方，我想知道它们是什么意思。然而，“第三方”更为常见和熟悉。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|505567|“第三方软件”是一个常见的术语。我从来没有听说过“第一方软件”或“第二方软件”。|505568|附言:我在英国以英语为母语。|505569|entityMap^0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$]]

I don't think first and second party are used that much, if at all, in programming. If someone started talking about first and second parties at work, I would wonder what they meant. However, "third party" is much more common and familiar.

"Third party software" is a common term. I've never heard of "first party software", or "second party software". 

PS: I'm a native English speaker in the UK.

blocks|key|1976019|text|这是一个在以Windows为中心的开发中经常使用的术语:第一方和第二方是我(或你)和Microsoft；第三方是其他任何人：|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1976020|Reflector有时指的是客户或最终用户(例如，“如果我们从微软获得了‘|1976021|’，这意味着我们可以将其重新分发给'third+parties'")|unordered-list-item|1976022|More‘，这通常意味着我正在使用的编程工具或库的非微软供应商(例如，"NUnit和|1976023|都是’第三方‘工具的例子”)。“|1976024|1976025|1976026|entityMap^0|0|0|0|1|1|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|O|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|F|7|Q|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|G|3|H|5|F|7|R|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|I|3|J|5|F|7|S|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|K|3|-4|5|6|7|T|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|L|3|-4|5|6|7|U|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|M|3|-4|5|6|7|V|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|N|$]]

It's a term that's often used in Windows-centric development: the first and second parties are me (or you), and Microsoft; and the third party is anyone else:

<ul>
<li>Sometimes it means the customer or end user (e.g. "if we get a 'redistributable' from Microsoft, that means that we can redistribute it to 'third parties'")</li>
<li>More often, it means a non-Microsoft vendor of programming tools or libraries, which I'm using (for example, "NUnit and Reflector are both example of 'third-party' tools").</li>
</ul>

blocks|key|3384340|text|它与ISO/IEC+17024合格评定相关。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|3384341|第一方：|offset|length|style|BOLD|3384342|object|3384343|由提供object|unordered-list-item|3384344|
的个人或组织执行|3384345|第二方：|3384346|3384347|由对object|3384348|具有用户兴趣的个人或组织执行|3384349|第三方：|3384350|3384351|由独立于提供对象的个人或组织以及该object|3384352|中的用户兴趣的个人或团体执行|3384353|3384354|结论：|3384355|第一方(+|3384356|First+party+)是指自我证明自己有能力的人。第二方(+|3384357|Second+party+)是与该人员(培训师/讲师/雇主)有关的人，声明该人员有能力。|3384358|第三方需要一个完全独立的第三方来声明该人有能力。|3384359|3384360|我的资料来源：|3384361|entityMap^0|0|0|4|0|0|0|0|0|4|0|0|0|0|0|4|0|0|0|0|0|0|3|0|0|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|1I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|1J|8|@$D|1K|E|1L|F|G]]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|1M|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|K|5|L|7|1N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|M|3|N|5|6|7|1O|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|O|3|P|5|6|7|1P|8|@$D|1Q|E|1R|F|G]]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|Q|3|-4|5|6|7|1S|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|R|3|S|5|L|7|1T|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|T|3|U|5|6|7|1U|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|V|3|W|5|6|7|1V|8|@$D|1W|E|1X|F|G]]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|X|3|-4|5|6|7|1Y|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|Y|3|Z|5|L|7|1Z|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|10|3|11|5|6|7|20|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|12|3|-4|5|6|7|21|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|13|3|14|5|6|7|22|8|@$D|23|E|24|F|G]]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|15|3|16|5|6|7|25|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|17|3|18|5|L|7|26|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|19|3|1A|5|L|7|27|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|1B|3|1C|5|L|7|28|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|1D|3|-4|5|6|7|29|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|1E|3|1F|5|6|7|2A|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|1G|3|-4|5|6|7|2B|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|1H|$]]

It is related to the ISO/IEC 17024 Conformity Assessment.

1st party:

<ul>
<li>Is performed by the person or organization that provides the object</li>
</ul>

2nd party:

<ul>
<li>Is performed by a person or organization that has a user interest in the object</li>
</ul>

3rd party:

<ul>
<li>Is performed by a person or body that is independent of the person or organization that provides the object, and of the user interests in that object</li>
</ul>

<hr>

Conclusion:

<ul>
<li>First party is the person self-attesting that he or she is competent. </li>
<li>Second party is someone related to the person (trainer/instructor/employer) declaring that the person is competent. </li>
<li>Third party would require an entirely independent party to declare the person competent.</li>
</ul>

My Source: <a href="http://www.proftesting.com/blog/2016/09/28/first-second-and-third-party/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://www.proftesting.com/blog/2016/09/28/first-second-and-third-party/</a>

blocks|key|1250908|text|牛津词典|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1250909|第三方|1250910|名词|1250911|两个人以外的一个人或一群人，尤其是一场争论。|1250912|·作为两党制中主要政党的替代而组成的政党。形容词attrib|1250913|属于或关于一个人或一个群体的，除了主要涉及的两个人或群体:第三方供应商。|1250914|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|O|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|Q|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|K|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|L|3|-4|5|6|7|T|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|M|$]]

Oxford Dictionnary

third party 
noun 
a person or group besides the two primarily involved in a situation, esp. a dispute. 
• a political party organized as an alternative to the major parties in a two-party system.
adjective [attrib.] 
of or relating to a person or group besides the two primarily involved in a situation : third-party suppliers.

blocks|key|3383979|text|我认为它是代码的出处，所以当涉及到库和开发工具时，我会说第一方和第二方是开发工具的开发者和生产者。因此，作为一名.Net开发人员，我和微软的合作伙伴是我和微软，因为我使用微软的框架和控件编写代码，然后我也可能使用第三方代码/控件。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|3383980|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

I think of it as from where the code comes from, so when it comes to libraries and development tools I'd say that the first and second parties are the developer and the producer of the development tool. So as a .Net developer the parties are me and Microsoft, since I write code using Microsofts framework and controls and I might also then user third party code/controls.

blocks|key|1250877|text|第一方是开发者，第二方是软件用户|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1250878|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

1st party is Developer, 2nd party is software user

blocks|key|507206|text|不过，它是由上下文驱动的。这种情况也适用。从开发的角度来看:我正在为我的公司开发一个内部使用的应用程序(第一方)大多数我用于该应用程序的“资产”来自微软(第二方)，但我也在使用来自另一家公司(第三方)的这个数据库库。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|507207|第一个和第二个仍然可以互换，这取决于视角。客户甚至不在这个图表上，但部分原因是这与它自己的规则是完全不同的关系。|507208|当谈论法律合同时要小心，因为他们经常使用术语第三方，因为我们正在讨论，还有一种做法是将pe4ople识别为“第一部分A的当事人，第二部分B的当事人，第三部分C的当事人，……，第n部分的当事人……|507209|它只用于列出一堆人，而不指定关系。也可以是第一部分a、b、c的当事人，也可以是第二部分x、y、z、…|507210|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|M|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|I|$]]

It's context driven though. This situation also applies.
From a development perspective:
I'm developing an app for my company for internal use (first Party)
Most of the "assets" that I'm using for the app are from Microsoft (second party)
But I'm also using this database library from this other company (third party)

First and Second remain interchangeable depending on perspective. The customer isn't even on this chart but that's partially because that's an entirely different relationship with it's own rules.

Be careful when talking about legal contracts because while they do often use the term third party as we're discussing, there is also the practice of identifying pe4ople as"the party of the first part A, the party of the second part B, the party of the Third part C, ... , the party of the nth part ...

which serves only to list a bunch of people without specifying a relationship. And it can also be the parties of the first part a,b,c and the parties of the second part x,y,z, ...

blocks|key|3384305|text|第一方是网站、程序或游戏的开发者。比如微软或谷歌。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|3384306|第二方是客户端，也就是开发者作品的浏览者。|3384307|第三方是媒体的外部来源。|3384308|entityMap^0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$]]

The first party is the developer of the website, program, or game. Like Microsoft or Google.

The second party is the client, the viewer of the developer's work.

The third party is an external source of media.

I know precisely what a "third-party library" is, so I assume that the "third-party" in this case, simply is an arbitrary person/company other than the developer?

Has it to do with "first person" / "second person" etc perhaps?

The fact that there is a "third party" suggests that there is a "first party" and a "second party" as well. Are those terms well defined?

(I'm not a native english speaker.)

Exactly what is a "third party"? (And who are the first and second party?)

翻译质量差，导致语言生硬或混乱。

没有提供实际的解决方法或示例。

解答不清晰，无法理解或解决问题。

页面排版不美观，阅读体验差。

文章

问答

视频

教程

学习中心

腾讯云实验室

直播

竞赛

腾讯云代码分析专区

腾讯iOA零信任安全管理系统专区

腾讯云架构师技术同盟交流圈

腾讯云数据库专区

腾讯云智能顾问专区

腾讯云原生专区

腾讯混元专区

腾讯云TCE专区

腾讯云Lighthouse专区

腾讯云HAI专区

腾讯云Edgeone专区

腾讯云存储专区

腾讯云智能专区

腾讯轻联专区 

腾讯云开发专区

TAPD专区

腾讯轻量云游戏服专区

腾讯云最具价值专家

腾讯云架构师技术同盟

腾讯云创作之星

腾讯云开发者先锋

腾讯云AI代码助手

云原生构建

TAPD 敏捷项目管理

Cloud Studio

SDK中心

API中心

命令行工具

功能1上新10个字符

功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符。

功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符。

功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符

功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符

功能4上新

文章&问答评论现已支持表情

全新交互，全新视觉，新增快捷键、悬浮工具栏、高亮块等功能并同时优化现有功能，全面提升创作效率和体验

社区富文本编辑器全新改版！诚邀体验～ 

精选全网热门MCP server，让你的AI更好用 🚀

💥开发者 MCP广场重磅上线！

涵盖代码开发、场景应用、自动测试全流程，助你从零构建专属AI助手

一站式MCP教程库，解锁AI应用新玩法

聚焦“写作效率、视觉美观与运行性能”三方面进行全面升级，为您提供更高效、稳定的创作环境

社区富文本&Markdown编辑器全新改版上线，欢迎大家体验!

诚挚邀请您参与本次调研，分享您的真实使用感受与建议。您的反馈至关重要，感谢您的支持与参与！

社区新版编辑器体验调研

我确切地知道什么是“第三方库”，所以我假设这种情况下的“第三方”仅仅是一个任意的人/公司，而不是开发人员？是否与“第一人称”/“第二人称”等有关？存在“第三方”的事实表明，存在“第一方”和“第二方”。这些术语定义得好吗？(我的母语不是英语。)

问到底什么是“第三方”？(谁是第一方和第二方？)
EN

回答 13

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问到底什么是“第三方”？(谁是第一方和第二方？)EN

回答 13

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问到底什么是“第三方”？(谁是第一方和第二方？)
EN