blocks|key|23536|text|我刚刚写了一篇博客，给了你一个并列的比较：|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|23537|23538|Scrum+for+Team+System+v3+|unordered-list-item|23539|MSF+Agile+v5|23540|TFS+Scrum+v1+(beta)|23541|23542|http://consultingblogs.emc.com/crispinparker/archive/2010/06/28/scrum-for-team-system-v3-0-msf-agile-v5-0-and-team-foundation-server-scrum-v1-0-beta.aspx|offset|length|23543|克里斯平。|23544|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url^0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|49|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|X|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|Y|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|C|3|D|5|E|7|Z|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|E|7|10|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|E|7|11|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|-4|5|6|7|12|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|K|3|L|5|6|7|13|8|@]|9|@$M|14|N|15|1|16]]|A|$]]|$1|O|3|P|5|6|7|17|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|Q|3|-4|5|6|7|18|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|R|$S|$5|T|U|V|A|$W|L]]]]

I have just written a blog that gives you a side by side comparison between:

<ul>
<li>Scrum for Team System v3 </li>
<li>MSF Agile v5</li>
<li>TFS Scrum v1 (beta)</li>
</ul>

<a href="http://consultingblogs.emc.com/crispinparker/archive/2010/06/28/scrum-for-team-system-v3-0-msf-agile-v5-0-and-team-foundation-server-scrum-v1-0-beta.aspx" rel="noreferrer">http://consultingblogs.emc.com/crispinparker/archive/2010/06/28/scrum-for-team-system-v3-0-msf-agile-v5-0-and-team-foundation-server-scrum-v1-0-beta.aspx</a>

Crispin.

blocks|key|771926|text|不确定确切的区别，但我记得在与Adam+Cogan的dnrTV节目中提到过这些，内容非常丰富。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|771927|771928|Adam+Cogan+on+TFS+and+Visual+Studio+2010+Part+1|unordered-list-item|offset|length|771929|Adam+Cogan+on+TFS+and+Visual+Studio+2010+Part+2|771930|771931|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DnrtvWmv/~3/NXqx7NNAOV0/default.aspx|1|http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DnrtvWmv/~3/6WzwIJYOhgA/default.aspx^0|0|0|0|1B|0|0|0|1B|1|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|U|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|V|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|C|3|D|5|E|7|W|8|@]|9|@$F|X|G|Y|1|Z]]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|E|7|10|8|@]|9|@$F|11|G|12|1|13]]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|-4|5|6|7|14|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|K|3|-4|5|6|7|15|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|L|$M|$5|N|O|P|A|$Q|R]]|S|$5|N|O|P|A|$Q|T]]]]

Not sure on the precise differences, but I remember these were mentioned in dnrTV shows with Adam Cogan which were quite informative.

<ul>
<li><a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DnrtvWmv/~3/NXqx7NNAOV0/default.aspx" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Adam Cogan on TFS and Visual Studio 2010 Part 1</a></li>
<li><a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DnrtvWmv/~3/6WzwIJYOhgA/default.aspx" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Adam Cogan on TFS and Visual Studio 2010 Part 2</a></li>
</ul>

blocks|key|2419634|text|我们正试图做出同样的决定，并对两者进行测试。现在，我们倾向于使用Scurm+for+Team+System模板。这主要是因为我们现在使用的是v2.2，并且已经习惯了该术语和流程。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|2419635|此外，SfTS+web服务可以自动执行许多任务，例如计算投资回报率和剩余工作量。我还没有在MSF+for+Agile中看到任何这样的证据。我知道我们可以自己写，但EMC在这方面做得很好，没有必要重新发明轮子。|2419636|MSF+for+Agile模板有一些很好的新报告，但我猜我可以获取rdls并使它们适用于SfTS模板。|2419637|我建议购买微软提供的2010Beta2的Virtual+PC+images。它已经有一个项目，其中包含MSF+Agile模板和输入的工作项。您可以添加SfTS模板并尝试这两个模板。|offset|length|2419638|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=27d91e63-e33b-4cef-a331-f20d343da9de&displaylang=en^0|0|0|0|K|H|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|T|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|U|8|@]|9|@$H|V|I|W|1|X]]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|-4|5|6|7|Y|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|K|$L|$5|M|N|O|A|$P|Q]]]]

We are trying to make the same decision and testing both. Right now, we are leaning towards the Scurm for Team System Template. This is primarily because we are using v2.2 now and have become accustomed to the terminology and process. 

Also, the SfTS web services automate many tasks such as calculating ROI and work remaining. I haven't seen any evidence of that with MSF for Agile. I know that we could write our own, but EMC did a fine job of it and there is no need to re-invent the wheel. 

The MSF for Agile template has some nice new reports, but I'm guessing that I can grab the rdls and make them work for SfTS template.

I'd recommend getting one of the <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=27d91e63-e33b-4cef-a331-f20d343da9de&amp;displaylang=en" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Virtual PC images</a> of 2010 beta 2 that MS has made available. It already has a project in there with the MSF Agile template and work items entered. You can add the SfTS template and try both out.

blocks|key|1010586|text|我们已经为TFS2008使用了Conchango的SfTS模板；他们的v3模板看起来很不错，但是微软的敏捷模板有一些很棒的报告功能，他们的计划电子表格看起来也很方便-我发现使用SfTS进行sprint计划是很痛苦的。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1010587|我可以想象从一个模板转换到另一个模板将是一个痛苦的练习；请注意，我们已经定制了SfTS模板，所以升级也不会是在公园里散步。|1010588|我已经在带有MS模板的虚拟机上运行了TFS2010，我还没有尝试过SfTS+v3模板。不过，我注意到了几件事：|1010589|1010590|MS的任务(+SfTS中的冲刺积压项目)比SfTS中的简单-它们只有两种状态，即活动和完成。关于什么时候在状态之间移动一个SBI，我们有各种各样毫无意义的争论(更糟糕的是，只给某些用户组在状态之间转换的权限)，所以我认为微软的方法是一种新鲜空气。|unordered-list-item|1010591|MS没有SfTS的Sprint工作项(它用于定义开始/结束日期和容量)；我还没有想出如何在MS中做到这一点，虽然我认为这与Excel计划工具有关，但我并不是一个很喜欢首先必须设置迭代路径，然后是Sprint工作项等|1010592|+MS报告很棒；SfTS报告明显不是这样，国际海事组织，并且他们中的一些从来没有正确地为我们工作。Conchango论坛不是最好的，反馈可能会很慢。|1010593|将测试(自动或其他)链接到MS中的测试用例的能力是双加可怕的，我不知道SfTS是否支持它们。如果不是，我怀疑这可能是我的团队的优势所在。|1010594|1010595|一两个月前我在Conchango论坛上问过这个问题，但除了几个me-too问题外，Conchango没有回应-你会认为他们真的想要推广他们的模板的优势。|1010596|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|U|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|V|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|W|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|X|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|G|3|H|5|I|7|Y|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|K|5|I|7|Z|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|L|3|M|5|I|7|10|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|N|3|O|5|I|7|11|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|P|3|-4|5|6|7|12|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|Q|3|R|5|6|7|13|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|S|3|-4|5|6|7|14|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|T|$]]

We've used Conchango's SfTS template for TFS 2008; their v3 template looks pretty good, but Microsoft's Agile template has some awesome reporting capabilities, and their planning spreadsheets look very handy as well - I found that sprint planning using SfTS was painful.

I would imagine that transitioning from one template to another would be a painful exercise; mind you, we've customised the SfTS template, so the upgrade won't be a walk in the park either.

I've got TFS2010 running on a VM with the MS template, I haven't tried the SfTS v3 template yet. A couple of things I've noticed though are:

<ul>
<li>MS's Tasks (Sprint Backlog Items in SfTS) are simpler than in SfTS - they only have two states, of Active and Done. We've had all sorts of pointless arguments over when to move an SBI between states (even worse, giving only certain user groups permissions to transition between states), so I could quite see Microsoft's approach being a breath of fresh air.</li>
<li>MS doesn't have SfTS's Sprint workitem (which is used to define start/end dates and capacity); I haven't figured out yet how to do this in MS, although I think it's related to the Excel planning tools, but I'm not a big fan of having to set up the Iteration Path first, then the Sprint workitem etc</li>
<li>The MS reports are awesome; the SfTS reports markedly less so, IMO, and some of them never worked properly for us. The Conchango forum is not the best, feedback can be quite slow in arriving.</li>
<li>The ability to link tests (automated or otherwise) to Test Cases in MS is double-plus awesome, I don't know if SfTS supports them or not. If not, I suspect this could be what swings it for my team.</li>
</ul>

I asked this question on the Conchango forum a month or two ago, but apart from a few me-too questions, there's been no response from Conchango - you'd think that they would want to really push the advantages of their template.

blocks|key|2419763|text|我们已经为我们所有的项目选择了Scrum模板-主要原因：|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|2419764|2419765|它自动汇总从任务到用户故事(产品积压项)的剩余小时数等。|ordered-list-item|2419766|它有预建的冲刺燃尽图报告|2419767|它将冲刺和冲刺开始-结束日期的信息作为工作项保存在TFS中--不仅仅是在Excel中(与敏捷模板一样)|2419768|它有一个Scrum仪表板(到目前为止还是测试版，但很有前途)|2419769|<代码>G29|2419770|它有一些缺点:+1.没有内置的完成时间，这很奇怪--但是很容易添加自己2.没有资源规划(敏捷模板在Excel中有这一点)+3.工作流和团队sprints的配置对我们来说太复杂了-我们宁愿他们能提供|2419771|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|C|3|D|5|E|7|T|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|E|7|U|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|E|7|V|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|K|5|E|7|W|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|L|3|M|5|6|7|X|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|N|3|O|5|6|7|Y|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|P|3|-4|5|6|7|Z|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|Q|$]]

We have chosen the Scrum template for all our projects - main reasons:

<ol>
<li>It automatically summarize hours remaining etc from tasks to user story (product backlog item)</li>
<li>It has pre-built reports for sprint burndown charts</li>
<li>It saves the information regarding sprints and start-end dates for sprints as workitems in TFS - not only in Excel (as with Agile template)</li>
<li>It has a Scrum Dashboard (very beta so far - but promising)</li>
</ol>

It has some drawbacks:
1. No built in Completed Hours which is rather strange - it is however easy to add yourself
2. No resource planning (the agile template has this in Excel)
3. The configuration with Workstreams, Team sprints is too complicated for us - we would rather if they could offer

What is the diff between Conchango and the builtin agile template in TFS 2010. 
Any recommendations ?
Thanks

Conchango vs MS agile template on TFS 2010

翻译质量差，导致语言生硬或混乱。

没有提供实际的解决方法或示例。

解答不清晰，无法理解或解决问题。

页面排版不美观，阅读体验差。

文章

问答

视频

教程

学习中心

腾讯云实验室

直播

竞赛

腾讯云代码分析专区

腾讯iOA零信任安全管理系统专区

腾讯云架构师技术同盟交流圈

腾讯云数据库专区

腾讯云智能顾问专区

腾讯云原生专区

腾讯混元专区

腾讯云TCE专区

腾讯云Lighthouse专区

腾讯云HAI专区

腾讯云Edgeone专区

腾讯云存储专区

腾讯云智能专区

腾讯轻联专区 

腾讯云开发专区

TAPD专区

腾讯轻量云游戏服专区

腾讯云最具价值专家

腾讯云架构师技术同盟

腾讯云创作之星

腾讯云开发者先锋

腾讯云AI代码助手

云原生构建

TAPD 敏捷项目管理

Cloud Studio

SDK中心

API中心

命令行工具

功能1上新10个字符

功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符。

功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符。

功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符

功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符

功能4上新

文章&问答评论现已支持表情

全新交互，全新视觉，新增快捷键、悬浮工具栏、高亮块等功能并同时优化现有功能，全面提升创作效率和体验

社区富文本编辑器全新改版！诚邀体验～ 

精选全网热门MCP server，让你的AI更好用 🚀

💥开发者 MCP广场重磅上线！

涵盖代码开发、场景应用、自动测试全流程，助你从零构建专属AI助手

一站式MCP教程库，解锁AI应用新玩法

聚焦“写作效率、视觉美观与运行性能”三方面进行全面升级，为您提供更高效、稳定的创作环境

社区富文本&Markdown编辑器全新改版上线，欢迎大家体验!

诚挚邀请您参与本次调研，分享您的真实使用感受与建议。您的反馈至关重要，感谢您的支持与参与！

社区新版编辑器体验调研

Conchango和TFS2010中的内置敏捷模板有什么不同？有什么建议吗？谢谢

问Conchango vs MS agile template on TFS 2010
EN

回答 5

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问Conchango vs MS agile template on TFS 2010EN

回答 5

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问Conchango vs MS agile template on TFS 2010
EN