blocks|key|300900|text|其他一些：|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|300901|300902|NUnitForms|unordered-list-item|offset|length|300903|Quail|300904|300905|我相信它们都是免费的，而且Quail看起来真的很棒！|300906|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://nunitforms.sourceforge.net/|1|http://www.andreev.org/qa-testing-automation^0|0|0|0|A|0|0|0|5|1|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|W|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|X|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|C|3|D|5|E|7|Y|8|@]|9|@$F|Z|G|10|1|11]]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|E|7|12|8|@]|9|@$F|13|G|14|1|15]]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|-4|5|6|7|16|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|K|3|L|5|6|7|17|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|M|3|-4|5|6|7|18|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|N|$O|$5|P|Q|R|A|$S|T]]|U|$5|P|Q|R|A|$S|V]]]]

Some others:

<ul>
<li><a href="http://nunitforms.sourceforge.net/" rel="noreferrer">NUnitForms</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.andreev.org/qa-testing-automation" rel="noreferrer">Quail</a></li>
</ul>

I believe they're both free, and Quail looks really nice!

blocks|key|70444|text|(我本打算对上面的答案进行评论，但没有空间了。)我们买了Ranorex，我不会再做了。他们对1.5版本的许可(我们使用的是什么)还不清楚。他们的书面许可是按用户计算的，他们的营销人员说是按机器计算的。尽管如此，强制执行是基于密钥的，当机器被擦除或替换测试人员进入时，这并不是什么大问题。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|70445|对于2.0产品，他们的许可现在与机器捆绑在一起。重新镜像一台机器，你就可以重新授权它了。我不打算用我公司的几千美元来支持这种麻烦，而且我们也没有升级。|70446|为了满足他们对产品的需求，可以使用UI自动化框架轻松地编写许多功能。Ranorex是一个不错的产品，但我质疑它的价值。我们正在将许多新测试转移到UI自动化框架中进行编码，因为无论如何我们最终都会修改Ranorex生成的代码。|70447|entityMap^0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$]]

(I was going to just comment on an answer above, but ran out of room.)
We bought Ranorex, and I wouldn't do it again. Their licensing for 1.5 (what we're using) was unclear. Their written license was per user, their marketing said per machine. Still, enforcement was key-based, and not a big deal when a machine got wiped or a replacement tester came in.

For the 2.0 product, their licensing is now tied to the machine. Reimage a machine and you get to relicense it. I'm just not going to support that kind of hassle with my company's thousands of dollars, and we didn't upgrade.

For what they want for the product, a lot of the functionality could be easily written using the UI Automation Framework. Ranorex is a decent product, but I question its value for the money. We're moving a lot of our new tests to just coding to the UI Automation Framework, as we often end up modifying Ranorex-generated code anyway.

blocks|key|70336|text|TestComplete。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|70337|您绝对可以使用capture-replay来捕获并运行测试脚本。但我建议您至少必须手动编辑您的脚本才能创建它们|70338|70339|more+readable|ordered-list-item|70340|easier+to+maintain。|70341|70342|关于TestComplete的好处是，它能够查看表单的属性，捕获这些属性，这样您就可以通过它们的名称来引用这些属性，而不仅仅是通过屏幕坐标。|70343|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://testcomplete.com/^0|0|C|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|W|8|@]|9|@$A|X|B|Y|1|Z]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|10|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|11|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|G|3|H|5|I|7|12|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|J|3|K|5|I|7|13|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|L|3|-4|5|6|7|14|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|M|3|N|5|6|7|15|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|O|3|-4|5|6|7|16|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|P|$Q|$5|R|S|T|C|$U|V]]]]

<a href="http://testcomplete.com" rel="nofollow noreferrer">TestComplete</a>.
You can definitely use capture-replay to capture and run the test script. But I would suggest that you must at least manually edit your scripts to make them
<ol>
<li>more readable</li>
<li>easier to maintain.</li>
</ol>
The good thing about TestComplete is that it is able to look into your form's properties, capture those properties so that you can refer to those properties by their name, not by just screen coordinates.

blocks|key|1475200|text|就像Tom+E所说的那样，在考虑记录/回放路径以实现测试自动化时，一定要小心。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1475201|请参阅鲍勃叔叔在Ruining+your+Test+Automation+Strategy上的文章。|1475202|主要的问题是记录/回放工具将测试耦合到GUI，这使得它们非常脆弱。|1475203|Bob叔叔的文章确实指出，需要在他建议清除业务规则代码的GUI...but上进行一些测试。|1475204|很抱歉，我不能为您提供特定的UI测试自动化tool...but，希望这篇文章能帮助您在如何使用最终使用的工具方面做出最佳决策。|1475205|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|https://stackoverflow.com/users/9267/tom-e|1|http://blog.objectmentor.com/articles/2009/09/29/ruining-your-test-automation-strategy^0|2|5|0|0|8|11|1|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|V|8|@]|9|@$A|W|B|X|1|Y]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|Z|8|@]|9|@$A|10|B|11|1|12]]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|13|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|14|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|J|3|K|5|6|7|15|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|L|3|-4|5|6|7|16|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|M|$N|$5|O|P|Q|C|$R|S]]|T|$5|O|P|Q|C|$R|U]]]]

Like <a href="https://stackoverflow.com/users/9267/tom-e">Tom E</a> stated, do take caution while considering going down the record/playback path for test automation.

See Uncle Bob's article on <a href="http://blog.objectmentor.com/articles/2009/09/29/ruining-your-test-automation-strategy" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Ruining your Test Automation Strategy</a>.

The main problem is that the record/playback tools couple the tests to the GUI which makes them very fragile.

Uncle Bob's article does point out that some testing needs to occur on the GUI...but that he recommends stubbing out the business rule code.

Sorry I can't provide you with a specific UI test automation tool...but hopefully this caveat will help you make the best decision on how to employ the tool that you eventually use.

blocks|key|300523|text|到目前为止，我发现：|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|300524|300525|Ranorex，看起来真的很不错。|unordered-list-item|offset|length|300526|Test+Automation+FX，看起来也不错，而且价格也很合理。没有记录器的|300527|Microsoft's+UI+Automation+Framework，，但如果有必要的话，我可以使用this.|300528|white编写一个，它看起来类似于UI自动化框架，但有一个alpha质量的记录器。|300529|300530|如果你用过其中的任何一个，请发表评论。|300531|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.ranorex.com/|1|http://www.testautomationfx.com/|2|http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms747327.aspx|3|http://www.codeplex.com/white^0|0|0|0|7|0|0|0|I|1|0|0|Z|2|0|0|5|3|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|14|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|15|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|C|3|D|5|E|7|16|8|@]|9|@$F|17|G|18|1|19]]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|E|7|1A|8|@]|9|@$F|1B|G|1C|1|1D]]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|K|5|E|7|1E|8|@]|9|@$F|1F|G|1G|1|1H]]|A|$]]|$1|L|3|M|5|E|7|1I|8|@]|9|@$F|1J|G|1K|1|1L]]|A|$]]|$1|N|3|-4|5|6|7|1M|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|O|3|P|5|6|7|1N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|Q|3|-4|5|6|7|1O|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|R|$S|$5|T|U|V|A|$W|X]]|Y|$5|T|U|V|A|$W|Z]]|10|$5|T|U|V|A|$W|11]]|12|$5|T|U|V|A|$W|13]]]]

So far I have found:

<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.ranorex.com" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Ranorex</a> which looks really good. </li>
<li><a href="http://www.testautomationfx.com" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Test Automation FX</a>, also looks good and seems very well priced. </li>
<li><a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms747327.aspx" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Microsoft's UI Automation Framework</a>, which does not have the recorder but if I had to I could code one using this.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.codeplex.com/white" rel="nofollow noreferrer">white</a> which looks similar to the UI Automation Framework, but has an alpha quality recorder. </li>
</ul>

Comments please if you have used any of these.

blocks|key|1474985|text|在SO上有一堆类似的问题：|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1474986|1474987|automate-interaction-with-a-gui-interface+(编辑:不再available)|unordered-list-item|1474988|automated-testing-of-windows-forms+(编辑:不再available)|1474989|automated-testing-of-gui|offset|length|1474990|1474991|根据我的经验，web上有很多很好的开源工具，但开源胖客户端测试自动化工具的选择并不多。如果你想要强大功能的良好支持，特别是录音，你需要看看商业工具(QTP、RFT、TestPartner等)。|1474992|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|https://stackoverflow.com/questions/226342/automated-testing-of-gui^0|0|0|0|0|0|O|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|W|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|X|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|C|3|D|5|E|7|Y|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|E|7|Z|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|E|7|10|8|@]|9|@$J|11|K|12|1|13]]|A|$]]|$1|L|3|-4|5|6|7|14|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|M|3|N|5|6|7|15|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|O|3|-4|5|6|7|16|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|P|$Q|$5|R|S|T|A|$U|V]]]]

There are a bunch of similar questions on SO:

<ul>
<li>automate-interaction-with-a-gui-interface (Edit: no longer available)</li>
<li>automated-testing-of-windows-forms (Edit: no longer available)</li>
<li><a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/226342/automated-testing-of-gui">automated-testing-of-gui</a></li>
</ul>

In my experience, there are a lot of good open source tools for the web, but not so much selection for open source thick client test automation tools. If you want good support with robust functionality, especially recording, you will need to look at the commercial tools (QTP, RFT, TestPartner, etc...)

blocks|key|1600764|text|在我的公司，我们决定使用http://www.sikuli.org/。我们觉得它是成本(免费)、易用性、功能性和可扩展性的完美结合。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1600765|Sikuli是基于Python的(实际上是Jython)，它很棒，而且是开源的。这需要很少的编码，但它可以像调用函数一样简单。他们的IDE使入门变得非常容易。它不是一个记录和回放工具。它的功能基于计算机视觉算法--你给它截屏，告诉它要寻找什么，它会在屏幕上找到它，然后对它找到的东西执行请求的操作(点击、键入等)。这是真正的独立测试，因为Sikuli对软件及其测试一无所知。它不知道底层的APIs+-它只是做一个真正的人类会做的事情。|1600766|我们已经将Sikuli与Robot+Framework，http://robotframework.org/集成在一起，并创建了大量自定义python代码来构建一个健壮的测试平台。这可能不像从供应商那里授权一个工具那么容易，但在这两个开源工具上投入的时间和人才是非常值得的。|1600767|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.sikuli.org/|1|http://robotframework.org/^0|C|M|0|0|0|S|Q|1|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@$A|S|B|T|1|U]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|V|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|W|8|@]|9|@$A|X|B|Y|1|Z]]|C|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|10|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|I|$J|$5|K|L|M|C|$N|O]]|P|$5|K|L|M|C|$N|Q]]]]

At my company, we decided to go with <a href="http://www.sikuli.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.sikuli.org/</a>. We felt it was the perfect mix of cost (free), ease-of-use, functionality and extend-ability.

Sikuli is Python based (Jython, really) which is great and its open-source. There's a tiny bit of coding required, but it can be as easy as just calling functions. Their IDE makes it really easy to get started. It is not a record and playback tool. It functions based on computer vision algorithms - you give it screenshots of what to look for and it finds it on the screen and then performs the requested action (click, type, etc) on what it found. This is true independent testing since Sikuli knows nothing about the software its testing. It does not know about underlying APIs - it just does what a real human would do.

We have integrated Sikuli with Robot Framework, <a href="http://robotframework.org/" rel="nofollow">http://robotframework.org/</a>, and have created lots of custom python code to build a robust testing platform. This may not be as easy as licensing a tool from a vendor but the time and talent investment in these two open source tools has been well worth it.

blocks|key|300977|text|你应该看看http://opensourcetesting.org/functional.php这里列出了很多工具，你应该能找到满足你需要的东西。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|300978|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://opensourcetesting.org/functional.php^0|5|17|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

You should have a look at <a href="http://opensourcetesting.org/functional.php" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://opensourcetesting.org/functional.php</a> A lot of tools are listed here and you should find something that meet your needs.

blocks|key|301007|text|Visual+Studio+Team+Test+2010将带来一个用于记录和回放UI测试的工具。您可以在以下位置找到一些指导：|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|301008|Introduction+to+Record+and+Playback+Engine+in+VSTT+2010|offset|length|301009|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://blogs.msdn.com/vstsqualitytools/archive/2009/06/21/introduction-to-record-and-playback-engine-in-vstt-2010.aspx^0|0|0|1J|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|O|8|@]|9|@$D|P|E|Q|1|R]]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|A|$L|M]]]]

Visual Studio Team Test 2010 is coming with a tool for recording and playing back UI tests. You'll find some pointers at:

<a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/vstsqualitytools/archive/2009/06/21/introduction-to-record-and-playback-engine-in-vstt-2010.aspx" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Introduction to Record and Playback Engine in VSTT 2010</a>

blocks|key|70144|text|Checkout+Ranorex，商业版，相当昂贵但功能强大(无附属关系)。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|70145|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.ranorex.com/^0|9|7|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

Checkout <a href="http://www.ranorex.com/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Ranorex</a>, commercial, quite expensive but powerful (not affiliated).

blocks|key|301017|text|我们在几年前就开始使用水星TestDirector了，并且对它非常满意。(其他人提到的所有警告都适用。)|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|301018|水星被惠普收购，这些工具已经更名为惠普QuickTest。不确定有多大的变化，但肯定值得一看。|301019|我试图包含一个link+to+the+HP+website，但是这个URL看起来不太“稳定”。不完全是一个建立信心的人……|offset|length|301020|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|https://h10078.www1.hp.com/cda/hpms/display/main/hpms_content.jsp?zn=bto&cp=1-11-127_4000_100__^0|0|0|7|M|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|Q|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@$F|S|G|T|1|U]]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|V|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|I|$J|$5|K|L|M|A|$N|O]]]]

We were using Mercury TestDirector a few years ago and quite happy with it. (All the caveats as mentioned by others apply.)

Mercury was aquired by HP and the tools have been rebranded as HP QuickTest. Not sure how much has changed, but certainly worth a look.

I tried to include a <a href="https://h10078.www1.hp.com/cda/hpms/display/main/hpms_content.jsp?zn=bto&amp;cp=1-11-127_4000_100__" rel="nofollow noreferrer">link to the HP website</a>, but the URL doesn't look too "stable". Not exactly a confidence builder ....

blocks|key|300717|text|我的建议是QA代理(http://qaagent.com/)。它是基于web的免费IDE，用于开发web自动化测试。基本上，您是在使用jQuery开发您的测试。您可以在浏览器中运行测试。它看起来像一个新的项目，但我真的很喜欢在浏览器中开发测试的想法。您知道设置测试环境需要多长时间。使用QA代理需要10秒。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|300718|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://qaagent.com/^0|A|J|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

My proposal is QA Agent(<a href="http://qaagent.com/" rel="nofollow">http://qaagent.com/</a>). It is free web based IDE for development of web automated tests. Basically you are using jQuery to develop your tests. You can run tests in your browser. It looks like a new projects, but I really like the idea to develop tests in the browser. You know how long it takes to set up your testing environment. With QA Agent it takes 10 seconds.

Looking for a tool to UI testing of a Windows (.NET WinForms) application. The idea is that the analysts will record the tests via some UI and it will be able to be played back over and over again. 

Commercial tools are fine but bonus points for free ones.

UI Testing Tool?

翻译质量差，导致语言生硬或混乱。

没有提供实际的解决方法或示例。

解答不清晰，无法理解或解决问题。

页面排版不美观，阅读体验差。

文章

问答

视频

教程

学习中心

腾讯云实验室

直播

竞赛

腾讯云代码分析专区

腾讯iOA零信任安全管理系统专区

腾讯云架构师技术同盟交流圈

腾讯云数据库专区

腾讯云智能顾问专区

腾讯云原生专区

腾讯混元专区

腾讯云TCE专区

腾讯云Lighthouse专区

腾讯云HAI专区

腾讯云Edgeone专区

腾讯云存储专区

腾讯云智能专区

腾讯轻联专区 

腾讯云开发专区

TAPD专区

腾讯轻量云游戏服专区

腾讯云最具价值专家

腾讯云架构师技术同盟

腾讯云创作之星

腾讯云开发者先锋

腾讯云AI代码助手

云原生构建

TAPD 敏捷项目管理

Cloud Studio

SDK中心

API中心

命令行工具

功能1上新10个字符

功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符。

功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符。

功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符

功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符

功能4上新

文章&问答评论现已支持表情

全新交互，全新视觉，新增快捷键、悬浮工具栏、高亮块等功能并同时优化现有功能，全面提升创作效率和体验

社区富文本编辑器全新改版！诚邀体验～ 

精选全网热门MCP server，让你的AI更好用 🚀

💥开发者 MCP广场重磅上线！

涵盖代码开发、场景应用、自动测试全流程，助你从零构建专属AI助手

一站式MCP教程库，解锁AI应用新玩法

聚焦“写作效率、视觉美观与运行性能”三方面进行全面升级，为您提供更高效、稳定的创作环境

社区富文本&Markdown编辑器全新改版上线，欢迎大家体验!

诚挚邀请您参与本次调研，分享您的真实使用感受与建议。您的反馈至关重要，感谢您的支持与参与！

社区新版编辑器体验调研

寻找一个工具，以UI测试视窗(.NET WinForms)的应用程序。这个想法是分析师将通过一些UI记录测试，它将能够一遍又一遍地回放。商业工具很好，但免费工具的加分。

问UI测试工具？
EN

回答 12

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问UI测试工具？EN

回答 12

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问UI测试工具？
EN