blocks|key|326772|text|我知道这是一个关于您应该使用哪个GUI工具包的问题，但是您生成用户友好的UI的第一项技术是纸和笔。画出一些模型。在施工纸上绘制按钮和菜单，将它们剪下，然后将它们粘合在一起。然后在大约六个人身上尝试你的模型。你很快就会发现是什么造就了一个好的UI。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|326773|不管UI看起来有多好，或者它是否使用了最新的时髦效果--如果你的用户不知道如何使用它，他们就会去其他地方。在编写一行代码之前，您需要了解什么对您的目标受众有效。|326774|阅读Don't+Make+Me+Think以了解如何制作模型和进行用户测试。|offset|length|326775|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|https://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/com/0321344758^0|0|0|2|J|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|Q|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@$F|S|G|T|1|U]]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|V|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|I|$J|$5|K|L|M|A|$N|O]]]]

I know this is a question about which GUI toolkit you should use, but your first technology for producing a user-friendly UI is pen and paper. Sketch out some mock-ups. Draw buttons and menus on construction paper, cut them out, and glue them together. Then try your mockups on about a half-dozen people. You'll quickly find out what makes a good UI.

It doesn't matter how good the UI looks or whether it uses the latest snazzy effects -- if your users can't figure out how to use it, they'll go elsewhere. You need to learn what works for your target audience before you write a single line of code.

Read <a href="https://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/com/0321344758" rel="noreferrer" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Don't Make Me Think</a> to learn how to make mock-ups and do user testing.

blocks|key|122361|text|如果你正在追踪一个IP地址，你肯定会想要用Visual+Basic来创建你的GUI界面。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|122362|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

If' you're tracking an IP address, you'll definitely want to create your GUI Interface in Visual Basic.

blocks|key|326931|text|使用Visual+Studio2005/2008/2010+Studio中的.NET框架。我没有在任何其他环境中开发过，但我已经能够在这个IDE+/+Framework中创建漂亮的应用程序。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|326932|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

Use the .NET framework in Visual Studio 2005/2008/2010 Studio. I haven't developed in any other environment, but I have been able to create nice looking apps in this IDE / Framework.

blocks|key|1527382|text|“最佳”取决于你的评估函数是什么。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1527383|在非基于web的应用程序中，对于基于windows的应用程序来说，很难击败C#/VB或任何其他.NET语言和环境，以实现易于开发和高质量的用户界面。根据UI的质量，MPF将为您提供更大的灵活性和控制力，而windows窗体将使其更易于开发。|1527384|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

"Best" depends on what your evaluation function is. 

For ease of development, and high quality UI, in a non-web based app it's hard to beat C#/VB or any other .NET language and environment for a windows-based app. Depending on the quality of the UI, MPF will give you greater flexibility and control, whereas windows form will make it easier to develop.

blocks|key|1628703|text|使用Windows+Presentation+Foundation已经有一段时间了，我强烈推荐它。有一个相当大的学习曲线，老实说，微软应该包括一些默认情况下没有包括的控件(数据网格是最大的)(但将在.NET+4.0中包含)。WPF和XAML+exceed提供了一个基础，您可以在此基础上构建几乎任何内容。您可以设置任何控件的任何部分的样式，并从头开始构建您自己的复合控件。在绑定和值转换器上花了很多心思，一旦您习惯了XAML的声明性本质，您就不会想回头了。我工作的公司已经使用它几年了，我们过去开发的GUI(主要是winforms和asp.net)和我们现在开发的GUI在外观和功能上都有很大的不同。不管怎么说，我的观点是……|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1628704|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

Having used Windows Presentation Foundation for a while now i would highly recommend it. There is a pretty big learning curve and, to be honest, MSFT should have included some controls (the datagrid being the biggest one) that were not included by default (but will be in .NET 4.0). Where WPF and XAML exceed is providing a foundation from which you can build just about anything. You can style ANY part of ANY control and build your own composite controls from scratch. A lot of thought went into binding and value converters and once you get used to the declarative nature of XAML you wont want to turn back. The company I work for has been using it for a couple of years now and the difference between the GUIs we used to develop (mainly winforms and asp.net) and what we develop now are night and day in terms of both look-and-feel and functionality. My two cents anyway...

blocks|key|326978|text|那得看情况。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|326979|GUI将在哪种设备上使用，手持式、PC、Mac？Windows、Linux、Web是什么平台？它将是什么类型的应用程序，会计，电子邮件客户端，web应用程序？哪些用户将使用该应用程序(针对儿童的GUI可能与针对成人的GUI不同)？|326980|在开始对你的问题做出回答之前，必须考虑到所有这些事情。|326981|entityMap^0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$]]

It depends. 

What device will the GUI be used on, hand held, PC, Mac?
What platform Windows, Linux, Web?
What kind of application will it be, accounting, email client, web application?
What audience will be using the application (a GUI aimed at a child may be different than one aimed at an adult)?

All of these things must be taken into account before even starting to formulate an answer to your question.

blocks|key|1527515|text|对于开发GUI，您有几种选择。首先，如果跨平台是一个问题，考虑使用Java或Python。您还可以使用Adobe+AIR并在Flex中开发gui。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1527516|如果您将产品定向到windows+only用户，.NET+WPF是最好的解决方案，具有非常丰富的控件和示例集。您也可以将.NET与mono一起使用，以实现跨平台兼容性，但目前不支持WPF。|1527517|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

You have several choices for developing a GUI.
first, if cross platform is an issue consider using Java or Python.
you can also use Adobe AIR and develop the gui in Flex.

If you direct the product to windows only users .NET WPF is the best solution, with a very rich set of control and examples.
You can also use .NET with mono for cross platform compatibility, but WPF isn't currently supported.

blocks|key|1527657|text|桌面，移动端，视窗，Linux，数据库，OpenGL：Nokia+Qt。使用Python+-+PyQt开发过程是最短和简单的。包含所有必需的python+&+qt库和模块的应用程序大小约为30MB，Inno+Setup安装大小为8MB，适用于Windows+2000及更新版本的Python+2.6.x，基于Python+2.5.x的应用程序可从Windows+95运行到Windows+7。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1527658|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://qt.nokia.com/products/^0|R|8|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

Desktop, Mobile, Windows, Linux, Database, OpenGL: <a href="http://qt.nokia.com/products/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Nokia Qt</a>. Wiht Python - PyQt development process is shortest and easy. Application containing all required python &amp; qt libraries and modules is around 30MB with Inno Setup installation is 8MB and will work on Windows 2000 and newer for Python 2.6.x, Python 2.5.x based application will run from Windows 95 to Windows 7.

blocks|key|1628814|text|我认为你列出的所有属性--效率、用户友好性等--都是好设计的属性，而不是好的工具包的属性。几乎任何工具包都可以用来实现这些目标。我认为如果你问的是花哨、花哨的多媒体等，问题可能会有所不同。肯定有一些工具包比其他的做得更好。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1628815|如果你首先对可用性感兴趣(听起来是这样)，专注于设计，然后选择符合你当前能力并能处理你的设计的工具包。例如，如果您需要3D图像，这可能会缩小您的选择范围；同样，如果您需要显示视频，这将影响您可以选择的工具包。|1628816|所以，从一个好的设计开始吧。在此基础上，创建工具包的需求列表--丰富的编辑控件、视频、3D等，然后查找提供所需内容的工具包。|1628817|世界上最好的工具包也无法弥补糟糕的设计。|1628818|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|M|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|I|$]]

I think all the attributes you list -- efficiency, user friendliness, etc -- are attributes of a good design rather than a good toolkit. Just about any toolkit can be used to meet those goals. I think the question might be different if you were asking about eye candy, fancy multi-media, etc. There are definitely some toolkits that do that better than others.

If you're interested in usability first (and it sounds like you are), focus on the design then pick whatever toolkit meets your current abilities and can handle your design. For example, if you require 3D images that might narrow your choices; likewise if you need to show videos, that will influence which toolkits you can choose from.

So, start with a good design. From that, create a list of requires for the toolkit -- rich editing controls, video, 3D, etc. And then look for a toolkit that provides what you need.

The best toolkit in the world won't make up for poor design.

blocks|key|122322|text|就我个人而言，在使用了Win32、表单和WPF之后，再去Mac/iPhone+GUI开发，我非常喜欢Mac/iPhone+GUI中的灵活性和高质量的视觉效果。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|122323|一个最有用的例子是，在NSTable/UITable控件(Windows中的ListViews或类似控件)中，每个单元格都是一个完全可定制的视图(Windows中的控件)。|122324|在ListView中，您对视图中的每个单元格/项目的自定义很少，因为您只提供详细信息，而不是实际的控件，NSTable/UITable要求您提供一个表单元格，您可以向其中添加任何内容，如按钮、开关和图像视图。|122325|在我看来，Mac+OS+GUI开发要灵活得多，而且在这方面也更加灵活。一切都是一个视图，所以我可以把我自己的内容放到任何东西上。|122326|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|M|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|I|$]]

Personally after having used Win32, Forms and WPF then going to Mac/iPhone GUI development, I very much prefer the flexibility and high quality of visuals in the Mac/iPhone GUI.

One of the most useful examples is the fact that in NSTable/UITable controls (ListViews or similar in Windows), every cell is a fully customisable View (a Control in Windows).

Where in a ListView you have very little customisation for each cell/item in the view since you only provide details, not an actual control, an NSTable/UITable asks you for a table cell which you can add anything to, such as buttons, switches and image views.

Mac OS GUI development to me is a LOT more flexible and more consistently flexible in that regard. Everything is a View so I can my own contents to anything.

blocks|key|122120|text|你考虑过Silverlight吗？|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|122121|它可以用来创建互联网应用程序，但也可以在浏览器中运行以创建桌面应用程序。它与WPF有很大的重叠，尽管在从一个切换到另一个时，可能会有一些差异。|122122|Expression+Blend+3是一个非常好的可视化设计器，它生成的代码非常高效。|122123|entityMap^0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$]]

Have you considered Silverlight?

It can be used to create internet applications, but it can also be run out of browser to create desktop applications. It's has significant overlap with WPF though there are differences which might catch you out when swapping from one to the other.

Expression Blend 3 is a very good visual designer and the code it produces is quite efficient.

There are many more technologies and tools available to build the front end for an application.

Which is the best technology/tool/platform available using which I can build a better GUI, by which I'll be able to build a nice looking as well as an efficient GUI?

Definition of "better" includes factors such as efficiency,user friendliness,better content control mechanism, navigation and many more.

Preferable technology that I should use to create an efficient and user friendly GUI?

翻译质量差，导致语言生硬或混乱。

没有提供实际的解决方法或示例。

解答不清晰，无法理解或解决问题。

页面排版不美观，阅读体验差。

文章

问答

视频

教程

学习中心

腾讯云实验室

直播

竞赛

腾讯云代码分析专区

腾讯iOA零信任安全管理系统专区

腾讯云架构师技术同盟交流圈

腾讯云数据库专区

腾讯云智能顾问专区

腾讯云原生专区

腾讯混元专区

腾讯云TCE专区

腾讯云Lighthouse专区

腾讯云HAI专区

腾讯云Edgeone专区

腾讯云存储专区

腾讯云智能专区

腾讯轻联专区 

腾讯云开发专区

TAPD专区

腾讯轻量云游戏服专区

腾讯云最具价值专家

腾讯云架构师技术同盟

腾讯云创作之星

腾讯云开发者先锋

腾讯云AI代码助手

云原生构建

TAPD 敏捷项目管理

Cloud Studio

SDK中心

API中心

命令行工具

功能1上新10个字符

功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符。

功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符。

功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符

功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符

功能4上新

文章&问答评论现已支持表情

全新交互，全新视觉，新增快捷键、悬浮工具栏、高亮块等功能并同时优化现有功能，全面提升创作效率和体验

社区富文本编辑器全新改版！诚邀体验～ 

精选全网热门MCP server，让你的AI更好用 🚀

💥开发者 MCP广场重磅上线！

涵盖代码开发、场景应用、自动测试全流程，助你从零构建专属AI助手

一站式MCP教程库，解锁AI应用新玩法

聚焦“写作效率、视觉美观与运行性能”三方面进行全面升级，为您提供更高效、稳定的创作环境

社区富文本&Markdown编辑器全新改版上线，欢迎大家体验!

诚挚邀请您参与本次调研，分享您的真实使用感受与建议。您的反馈至关重要，感谢您的支持与参与！

社区新版编辑器体验调研

有更多的技术和工具可用于构建应用程序的前端。我可以使用哪种最好的技术/工具/平台来构建更好的GUI，从而能够构建一个美观高效的GUI？“更好”的定义包括效率、用户友好性、更好的内容控制机制、导航等因素。

问我应该使用哪种技术来创建一个高效和用户友好的GUI？
EN

回答 11

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问我应该使用哪种技术来创建一个高效和用户友好的GUI？EN

回答 11

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问我应该使用哪种技术来创建一个高效和用户友好的GUI？
EN