blocks|key|1229010|text|有专门针对编程的Dvorak布局：http://www.kaufmann.no/roland/dvorak/|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1229011|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.kaufmann.no/roland/dvorak/^0|H|11|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

There are Dvorak layouts specifically for programming: <a href="http://www.kaufmann.no/roland/dvorak/" rel="noreferrer">http://www.kaufmann.no/roland/dvorak/</a>

blocks|key|1479328|text|我没有看到这一点被提及，所以我想我应该加上这一点:我在QWERTY键盘上使用Dvorak布局，带有QWERTY命令键布局。这意味着每当我按下命令按钮(我在Mac上)时，QWERTY布局就会生效。所以我用Dvorak布局完全“蒙着眼睛”打字，但我不需要重新学习键盘快捷键。到目前为止，QWERTY在过去的四年里工作得很好，我不会再改回QWERTY。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1479329|唯一的缺点是在使用VIM时，但现在我主要使用vim做一些简单的事情，例如通过SSH修改配置文件。|1479330|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

Didn't see this mentioned, so I thought I'd add this: I'm using the Dvorak layout on a QWERTY keyboard, with QWERTY command key layout. Means every time I press the command button (I'm on a Mac), the QWERTY layout applies. So I'm typing completely "blindfolded" with the Dvorak layout, but I didn't have to re-learn the keyboard shortcuts. Has worked great so far for the last 4 years and I wouldn't change back to QWERTY.

The only downside of this is when using VIM, but nowadays I mostly use vim only for simple things, e.g. modifying config files over SSH.

blocks|key|4445991|text|您可能需要考虑colemak布局。从faq|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|4445992|4445993|编程语言大量使用标点符号。Colemak将几乎所有的标点键都保留在QWERTY位置，以简化从QWERTY的过渡。这取决于您使用的编程语言、变量命名约定(CamelCase与下划线)以及您使用的编辑器。归根结底，这是个人偏好的问题。您可能希望将AltGr序列重新映射为您经常使用的标点符号。|blockquote|4445994|4445995|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://colemak.com/FAQ#Is_Colemak_better_than_Dvorak_for_programming.3F^0|I|3|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|Q|8|@]|9|@$A|R|B|S|1|T]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|U|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|E|3|F|5|G|7|V|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|W|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|I|3|-4|5|6|7|X|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|J|$K|$5|L|M|N|C|$O|P]]]]

You may want to consider the colemak layout. from the <a href="http://colemak.com/FAQ#Is_Colemak_better_than_Dvorak_for_programming.3F" rel="noreferrer">faq</a>:

<blockquote>
 Programming languages make heavy use
 of punctuation symbols. Colemak keeps
 almost all of the punctuation keys in
 their QWERTY positions to ease the
 transition from QWERTY. It depends on
 what programming languages you use,
 variable naming conventions (CamelCase
 vs. underscores) and what editor you
 use. In the end it's a matter of
 personal preference. You'd might want
 to remap the AltGr sequences to
 punctuation symbols you use often.
</blockquote>

blocks|key|1477066|text|Dvorak键盘的目的是通过将最多键入的字母放在首行，以防止手疲劳，至少对于英语来说是这样。由于编写代码的速度，我非常怀疑这是否会对编程有任何重大帮助。我总是在写的时候思考我写的是什么，变量名从来都不会完全符合标准英语。事实上，如果一个典型的源代码文件中的字母频率与已建立的英文字母频率有很大的不同，我不会感到惊讶。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1477067|如果你患有类似腕管的疾病，Dvorak可能会帮助你缓解。我不得不说，Dvorak键盘对日常写作和打字的帮助可能远远超过编程。|1477068|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

The purpose of the Dvorak keyboard is to prevent strain on the hands by keeping the most typed letters on the home row, at least for English. I highly doubt this would help with programming in any significant way due to the speed at which code is written. I always think about what I write as I write it, and variable names are never completely conforming to standard English. In fact, I would not be surprised if the letter frequencies in a typical file of source code varies dramatically from established English letter frequencies.

If you suffer from something like Carpal Tunnel, Dvorak may help alleviate that. I'd have to say that the Dvorak keyboard probably helps with regular writing and typing far more than with programming.

blocks|key|4445915|text|QWERTY和Dvorak键盘布局是为输入文本而不是代码而设计的。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|4445916|您可以尝试这样的布局来键入代码：Programmer+Dvorak+Keyboard+Layout|offset|length|4445917|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.kaufmann.no/roland/dvorak/^0|0|G|X|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|O|8|@]|9|@$D|P|E|Q|1|R]]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|A|$L|M]]]]

QWERTY and Dvorak keyboard layouts were designed for typing text not code. 
You can try layouts for typing code like this one: <a href="http://www.kaufmann.no/roland/dvorak/" rel="noreferrer">Programmer Dvorak Keyboard Layout</a>

blocks|key|1479351|text|我使用Dvorak已经超过一年半了。使用Dvorak布局的原因不是速度，而是舒适性本身。你想的比你输入的代码还多。我主要使用emacs编写代码，但是，我没有使用默认的键绑定。因为emacs是相对高度可定制的，所以我使用Ergoemacs键绑定。它真的帮助我在emacs中编写代码，同时保持我的Dvorak舒适性，当我想要执行emacs操作时，不需要到处跳转，这主要是使用组合键完成的。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1479352|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

I've been using Dvorak for more than 1.5 years. The reason of using Dvorak layout is not the speed, but the comfort itself. You think more than you type code. I code mostly using emacs, however, I'm not using default keybinding. Since emacs is relatively highly customisable, I use Ergoemacs keybindings. It really helps me to code in emacs, while retaining my Dvorak comfort without jumping here and there when I want to do an emacs operation which mostly done using key combination.

blocks|key|1228996|text|如果你在一个团队中工作，或者在其他人的电脑上打字，习惯于dvorak可能会有一点问题。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1228997|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

Being used to dvorak can be a bit of a problem if you're working in a team or something like that where you type on other peoples computers.

blocks|key|1229089|text|我使用Dvorak-es布局-optimized来表示西班牙语中字母的频率-无论是编程还是键入，在this和Qwerty中，特殊的键(){}[]<>/*等是相同的。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1229090|如果你要切换到Dvorak，也许用这些键的标准QWERTY位置来设计你自己的“程序员的Dvorak”布局是值得的。至少在Windows上，你可以使用MS+Keyboard+Layout+creator来做这件事。|offset|length|1229091|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=8BE579AA-780D-4253-9E0A-E17E51DB2223&displaylang=en^0|0|22|Q|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|O|8|@]|9|@$D|P|E|Q|1|R]]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|A|$L|M]]]]

I use a Dvorak-es layout -optimized for the frequency of letters in the Spanish language- both for programming and typing, and the special keys (){}[]&lt;>/* etc. are the same in this and Qwerty. 

If you're doing the switch to Dvorak, perhaps it would pay to design your own "Programmer's Dvorak" layout with the standard QWERTY positions for these keys. At least on Windows you could use the <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=8BE579AA-780D-4253-9E0A-E17E51DB2223&amp;displaylang=en" rel="nofollow noreferrer">MS Keyboard Layout creator</a> to do this.

blocks|key|177737|text|嗯，任何键盘都可以适合编程。如果你觉得打字很舒服，这很重要，因为它打破了你使用QWERTY打字的方式。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|177738|顺便说一句，这个键盘对于像我这样的左撇子来说是很糟糕的。|177739|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

Well any keyboard can be appropriate for programming. It just would matter if you find it comfortable for typing because it breaks your way of typing with QWERTY.

On a side note, this keyboard would be awful for left-handed people such as myself.

blocks|key|4445820|text|类似于前面的答案-任何键盘布局都可以是合适的，只要您觉得舒适，并且可以有效地使用它。如果你对Dvorak感兴趣，Dvorak总是有可能实现的--为什么不试一试呢？我肯定你能找到一个旧键盘来换几个键。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|4445821|最坏的情况:您恢复到qwerty。:)|4445822|Link|offset|length|4445823|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.wikihow.com/Switch-to-a-Dvorak-Keyboard-Layout^0|0|0|0|4|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|Q|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@$F|S|G|T|1|U]]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|V|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|I|$J|$5|K|L|M|A|$N|O]]]]

Similar to the previous answer - any keyboard layout can be appropriate if that is what you feel comfortable with and can work efficiently with. Dvorak could always be a possiblity if you're interested in it - why don't you give it a try? I'm sure you can find an old keyboard to switch a few keys around on.

Worst case scenario: you revert back to qwerty. :)

<a href="http://www.wikihow.com/Switch-to-a-Dvorak-Keyboard-Layout" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Link</a>

I'm always looking for ways to be more productive, and I've been reading a lot about typing using a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dvorak_Simplified_Keyboard" rel="noreferrer">Dvorak</a> keyboard.

It looks like this would be much more productive for writing normal prose, but what about for programming?

I'm skeptical that it would be effective, since the use of semicolons, colons, brackets, and ampersands are much more common in programming than they are in every day typing.

Has anyone had any experience with this?

Is Dvorak typing appropriate for programming?

翻译质量差，导致语言生硬或混乱。

没有提供实际的解决方法或示例。

解答不清晰，无法理解或解决问题。

页面排版不美观，阅读体验差。

文章

问答

视频

教程

学习中心

腾讯云实验室

直播

竞赛

腾讯云代码分析专区

腾讯iOA零信任安全管理系统专区

腾讯云架构师技术同盟交流圈

腾讯云数据库专区

腾讯云智能顾问专区

腾讯云原生专区

腾讯混元专区

腾讯云TCE专区

腾讯云Lighthouse专区

腾讯云HAI专区

腾讯云Edgeone专区

腾讯云存储专区

腾讯云智能专区

腾讯轻联专区 

腾讯云开发专区

TAPD专区

腾讯轻量云游戏服专区

腾讯云最具价值专家

腾讯云架构师技术同盟

腾讯云创作之星

腾讯云开发者先锋

腾讯云AI代码助手

云原生构建

TAPD 敏捷项目管理

Cloud Studio

SDK中心

API中心

命令行工具

功能1上新10个字符

功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符。

功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符。

功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符

功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符

功能4上新

文章&问答评论现已支持表情

全新交互，全新视觉，新增快捷键、悬浮工具栏、高亮块等功能并同时优化现有功能，全面提升创作效率和体验

社区富文本编辑器全新改版！诚邀体验～ 

精选全网热门MCP server，让你的AI更好用 🚀

💥开发者 MCP广场重磅上线！

涵盖代码开发、场景应用、自动测试全流程，助你从零构建专属AI助手

一站式MCP教程库，解锁AI应用新玩法

聚焦“写作效率、视觉美观与运行性能”三方面进行全面升级，为您提供更高效、稳定的创作环境

社区富文本&Markdown编辑器全新改版上线，欢迎大家体验!

诚挚邀请您参与本次调研，分享您的真实使用感受与建议。您的反馈至关重要，感谢您的支持与参与！

社区新版编辑器体验调研

我一直在寻找提高工作效率的方法，我读了很多关于使用键盘打字的文章。看起来这对于写普通的散文会更有效率，但是对于编程呢？我怀疑它是否有效，因为在编程中使用分号、冒号、括号和&符号比在日常输入中更常见。有没有人有这方面的经验？

问Dvorak类型是否适合编程？
EN

回答 10

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问Dvorak类型是否适合编程？EN

回答 10

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问Dvorak类型是否适合编程？
EN