blocks|key|3288559|text|MVC更像是一种架构模式，但不适用于完整的应用程序。MVC主要涉及应用程序的UI+/交互层。您仍然需要业务逻辑层，可能需要一些服务层和数据访问层。也就是说，如果你采用n层方法的话。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|3288560|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

MVC is more of an architectural pattern, but not for complete application. MVC mostly relates to the UI / interaction layer of an application. You're still going to need business logic layer, maybe some service layer and data access layer. That is, if you're into n-tier approach.

blocks|key|323975|text|为什么它们中必须有一个是真的？|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|323976|两者都可能是真的，这取决于你的观点。|323977|如果MVC构成了应用程序体系结构的基础，那么它可以是一种体系结构模式。|323978|它也可以简单地看作是一种设计模式，一种适用于任何应用程序的抽象概念。|323979|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|M|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|I|$]]

Why does one of them have to be true?

Both can be true, depending on point of view. 

MVC can be an architectual pattern, if it forms the basis of the application architecture.

It can also be seen as simply a design pattern, an abstract notion that is applicable to any application.

blocks|key|326285|text|设计模式讲述了如何有效地编写代码(考虑Code+Metrics)。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|offset|length|style|BOLD|entityRanges|data|326286|以下是一些好处：|326287|由于|326288|ordered-list-item|326289|的抽象，它很容易实现抽象|326290|架构模式讲述了如何有效地利用资源。|326291|像程序员和图形设计人员一样，可以利用parallel.|326292|Multiple技术来构建软件的|unordered-list-item|326293|并行任务执行。|326294|326295|326296|326297|+In+MVC，javascript+a)。视图可以使用javascript模板来创建，也可以使用html来使用。控制器可以用.NET框架和Java+)来编写。模型可以用Java语言来编写-可以使用仅返回json数据的java服务。|blockquote|326298|326299|而在设计模式中，不能使用多种技术来实现模式，其中代码可以用多种技术来编写，如Java中的AdminUser类、C#中的Customer类、PHP中的Partner类以及Ruby中的工厂模式:)；hmmm..so+easy?:)|326300|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb385914.aspx^0|0|4|J|C|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|4|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|L|2K|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|1D|8|@$9|1E|A|1F|B|C]]|D|@$9|1G|A|1H|1|1I]]|E|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|1J|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|1K|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|J|3|-4|5|K|7|1L|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|L|3|M|5|6|7|1M|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|N|3|O|5|6|7|1N|8|@$9|1O|A|1P|B|C]]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|P|3|Q|5|6|7|1Q|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|R|3|S|5|T|7|1R|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|U|3|V|5|K|7|1S|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|W|3|-4|5|6|7|1T|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|X|3|-4|5|6|7|1U|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|Y|3|-4|5|6|7|1V|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|Z|3|10|5|11|7|1W|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|12|3|-4|5|6|7|1X|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|13|3|14|5|6|7|1Y|8|@$9|1Z|A|20|B|C]]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|15|3|-4|5|6|7|21|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]]|16|$17|$5|18|19|1A|E|$1B|1C]]]]

Design patterns say how to write code effectively (considering <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb385914.aspx" rel="noreferrer">Code Metrics</a>).

A few benefits:

<ol>
<li>Easily Maintainable</li>
<li>High Re-usability</li>
<li>Readable because of abstractions</li>
</ol>

Architectural patterns say how to utilize resources effectively.

<ol>
<li>Parallel tasks execution like programmers and graphic designers can work parallel.</li>
<li>Multiple technologies can be utilized to build a software. </li>
</ol>

<blockquote>
 In MVC, 
 a). Views can be created using javascript templates and also html can be used
 b). Controllers can be written .NET framework and
 c). Models can be written in Java - a java service may be used that returns only json data.
 
 While in design pattern, a pattern can't be implemented in which
 code can be written in multiple technologies like AdminUser class in Java,
 Customer class in C#, Partners class in Php and a factory pattern in Ruby
 :); hmmm..so easy?:)
</blockquote>

blocks|key|3075283|text|我知道这个问题很久以前就得到了回答，但还没有人提到让MVC出名的书:+Buschmann等人在1996年出版的一本书:面向模式的软件架构(+Pattern-Oriented+Software+Architecture，POSA)。虽然不像Gamma等人的Design+Patterns书那样被广泛阅读，但POSA是模式社区使用的基础性书籍之一。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|3075284|哦，POSA非常清楚地将MVC定义为一种架构模式。我的直觉是，微软和Sun只是草率地将每个模式称为“设计模式”。|3075285|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

I know that it's been answered awhile ago, but no one has yet mentioned the book that made MVC famous: Pattern-Oriented Software Architecture (POSA), by Buschmann, et al published in 1996. Though not as widely read as the Design Patterns book, by Gamma, et al, POSA is one of the foundational books used by the patterns community.

Oh, and POSA very clearly identifies MVC as an architectural pattern. My hunch is that MS and Sun are just being sloppy and calling every pattern a "design pattern".

blocks|key|321645|text|模型/视图/控制器(+Model/View/Controller，MVC)三合一类中的设计模式包括但不限于：|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|321646|321647|Observer，解耦对象，使得对一个(模型)对象的更改可以影响任意数量的其他对象(视图)，而不需要更改的对象(模型)知道其他对象的详细信息(+views).|unordered-list-item|offset|length|style|BOLD|321648|Composite，，它允许我们对待组对象(复合视图)，就像我们对待它的单个对象一样(视图components).|321649|Strategy，，其中视图使用Controler子类的实例来实现特定的响应策略；要实现不同的策略，只需将实例替换为不同种类的controller.|321650|Factory方法，并为添加滚动到视图的view.|321651|Decorator，指定默认控制器类。|321652|321653|321654|参考|321655|策略设计pattern)|321656|Pages+4至6(+Smalltalk+MVC中的第1.2节设计模式)|321657|页293至304+(观察者设计pattern)|321658|Pages+163至174+(复合设计pattern)|321659|Pages+315至324+)策略设计pattern)|321660|Pages+107至116+(工厂方法设计pattern)|321661|Pages+175至185+(装饰器设计模式)|321662|321663|321664|埃里克·伽马，理查德·赫尔姆，拉尔夫·约翰逊和约翰·弗利塞德。设计模式:可重用面向对象软件的元素。Addison-Wesley，雷丁，马萨诸塞州，1994年。|321665|entityMap^0|0|0|0|8|0|0|9|0|0|8|0|0|9|0|0|9|0|0|0|0|2|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|1F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|1G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|C|3|D|5|E|7|1H|8|@$F|1I|G|1J|H|I]]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|K|5|E|7|1K|8|@$F|1L|G|1M|H|I]]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|L|3|M|5|E|7|1N|8|@$F|1O|G|1P|H|I]]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|N|3|O|5|E|7|1Q|8|@$F|1R|G|1S|H|I]]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|P|3|Q|5|E|7|1T|8|@$F|1U|G|1V|H|I]]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|R|3|-4|5|6|7|1W|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|S|3|-4|5|6|7|1X|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|T|3|U|5|6|7|1Y|8|@$F|1Z|G|20|H|I]]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|V|3|W|5|6|7|21|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|X|3|Y|5|E|7|22|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|Z|3|10|5|E|7|23|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|11|3|12|5|E|7|24|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|13|3|14|5|E|7|25|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|15|3|16|5|E|7|26|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|17|3|18|5|E|7|27|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|19|3|-4|5|6|7|28|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|1A|3|-4|5|6|7|29|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|1B|3|1C|5|6|7|2A|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|1D|3|-4|5|6|7|2B|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|1E|$]]

The design patterns inside the Model/View/Controller (MVC) triad of classes include and may not be limited to:

<ul>
<li>Observer, decoupling objects so that changes to one (the model) can affect any number of others (the views) without requiring the changed object (the model) to know details of the others (the views).</li>
<li>Composite, which lets us treat a group object (a composite view) just like we treat one of its individual objects (view components).</li>
<li>Strategy, where a view uses an instance of a Controller subclass to implement a particular response strategy; to implement a different strategy, simply replace the instance with a different kind of controller.</li>
<li>Factory Method, specifying the default controller class for a view.</li>
<li>Decorator, adding scrolling to a view.</li>
</ul>

<hr>

Reference

<ul>
<li>Pages 4 to 6 (Section 1.2 Design Patterns in Smalltalk MVC)</li>
<li>Pages 293 to 304 (Observer design pattern)</li>
<li>Pages 163 to 174 (Composite design pattern)</li>
<li>Pages 315 to 324 (Strategy design pattern)</li>
<li>Pages 107 to 116 (Factory Method design pattern)</li>
<li>Pages 175 to 185 (Decorator design pattern)</li>
</ul>

Eric Gamma, Richard Helm, Ralph Johnson, and John Vlissides. Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1994.

blocks|key|321496|text|我认为两者都是真的。如果您正在查看像Ruby+on+Rails这样的框架中MVC的特定实例化，那么该实例化更像是一种设计模式。如果您将MVC作为一个通用概念来看待，那么它更像是一个架构模式。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|321497|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

I think both are true. If you're looking at a particular instantiation of MVC in a framework like Ruby on Rails, that instantiation is more of a design pattern. If you look at MVC as a general concept, it's more of an architectural pattern.

blocks|key|323447|text|在软件架构书籍中，MVC总是作为/表示层被提及和介绍。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|323448|请阅读以下书籍：|323449|323450|Architecting+Microsoft.NET+Solutions+for+the+Enterprise+(微软press)|ordered-list-item|offset|length|323451|Professional+ASP.NET+design+patterns+(Wrox)|323452|Enterpise+Solutions+Patterns+Using+Microsoft.NET+(微软press)|323453|Patterns+of+Enterprise+Application+Architecture+(Addison+Wesley)|323454|A+Practical+Guide+to+Enterprise+Architecture+(Prentice+Hall)|323455|323456|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|https://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/com/073562609X|1|https://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/com/0470292784|2|https://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/com/0735618399|3|https://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/com/0321127420|4|https://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/com/0131412752^0|0|0|0|0|1J|0|0|0|10|1|0|0|1C|2|0|0|1B|3|0|0|18|4|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|18|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|19|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|1A|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|E|3|F|5|G|7|1B|8|@]|9|@$H|1C|I|1D|1|1E]]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|K|5|G|7|1F|8|@]|9|@$H|1G|I|1H|1|1I]]|A|$]]|$1|L|3|M|5|G|7|1J|8|@]|9|@$H|1K|I|1L|1|1M]]|A|$]]|$1|N|3|O|5|G|7|1N|8|@]|9|@$H|1O|I|1P|1|1Q]]|A|$]]|$1|P|3|Q|5|G|7|1R|8|@]|9|@$H|1S|I|1T|1|1U]]|A|$]]|$1|R|3|-4|5|6|7|1V|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|S|3|-4|5|6|7|1W|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|T|$U|$5|V|W|X|A|$Y|Z]]|10|$5|V|W|X|A|$Y|11]]|12|$5|V|W|X|A|$Y|13]]|14|$5|V|W|X|A|$Y|15]]|16|$5|V|W|X|A|$Y|17]]]]

MVC always mentioned and introduced as/in presentation layer in software architecture books.

Read these books:

<ol>
<li><a href="https://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/com/073562609X" rel="nofollow noreferrer" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Architecting Microsoft.NET Solutions for the Enterprise</a> (Microsoft press)</li>
<li><a href="https://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/com/0470292784" rel="nofollow noreferrer" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Professional ASP.NET design patterns</a> (Wrox)</li>
<li><a href="https://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/com/0735618399" rel="nofollow noreferrer" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Enterpise Solutions Patterns Using Microsoft.NET</a> (Microsoft press)</li>
<li><a href="https://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/com/0321127420" rel="nofollow noreferrer" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Patterns of Enterprise Application Architecture</a> (Addison Wesley)</li>
<li><a href="https://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/com/0131412752" rel="nofollow noreferrer" rel="nofollow noreferrer">A Practical Guide to Enterprise Architecture</a> (Prentice Hall)</li>
</ol>

blocks|key|321626|text|如果你把十个软件架构师放在一个房间里，让他们讨论什么是模型-视图-控制器模式，你最终会得到12种不同的意见。…一些纯粹主义者不可避免地会对我所说的“MVC”产生疑虑。欢迎在此网页底部的留言板上发表激烈的评论。我很乐意接受关于MVC含义的不同观点，但请记住，我并不关心。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|321627|乔希·史密斯|321628|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

If you put ten software architects into a room and have them discuss what the Model-View-Controller pattern is, you will end up with twelve different opinions. … Some of the purists out there will inevitably have qualms with what I refer to as “MVC”. Feel free to leave a flaming comment on the message board at the bottom of this Web page. I will gladly entertain different perspectives on what MVC means, but keep in mind that I do not care.

Josh Smith

blocks|key|326164|text|根据Martin+Fowler的说法，它们是图形用户界面架构：Martin+Fowler-GUI+architectures|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|326165|这取决于应用程序的大小，因为它只影响与GUI相关的类，在小的应用程序(主要是GUI)中，它可以被认为是一个架构模式，而在大型应用程序中，它只是一个应用于GUI代码的设计模式(可能占应用程序代码的10%25+)。|326166|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.martinfowler.com/eaaDev/uiArchs.html^0|V|V|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@$A|O|B|P|1|Q]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|M]]]]

And according to Martin Fowler they are GUI architectures: <a href="http://www.martinfowler.com/eaaDev/uiArchs.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Martin Fowler-GUI architectures</a>

It depends on the size of the application, as it only affects GUI related classes, in a small one (mostly GUI) it could be considered an architectural pattern whereas in a huge one it would just be a design pattern that you apply to the GUI code (could be 10% of the apps code).

blocks|key|323424|text|MVC是一种体系结构模式。在http://molecularsciences.org/zend/mvc_model_view_controller上非常清楚地陈述和展示|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|323425|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://molecularsciences.org/zend/mvc_model_view_controller^0|E|1N|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

MVC is architecture pattern. Very clearly stated and shown at <a href="http://molecularsciences.org/zend/mvc_model_view_controller" rel="nofollow">http://molecularsciences.org/zend/mvc_model_view_controller</a>

According to <a href="http://java.sun.com/blueprints/patterns/MVC.html" rel="noreferrer">Sun</a> and <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms978748.aspx" rel="noreferrer">Msdn</a> it is a design pattern.

According to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model%E2%80%93view%E2%80%93controller" rel="noreferrer">Wikipedia</a> it is an architectural pattern

<blockquote>
 In comparison to design patterns, architectural patterns are larger in scale.
 (Wikipedia - <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Architectural_pattern_(computer_science)" rel="noreferrer">Architectural pattern</a>)
</blockquote>

Or it is an architectural pattern that also has a design pattern ?

Which one is true ?

Is MVC a Design Pattern or Architectural pattern

翻译质量差，导致语言生硬或混乱。

没有提供实际的解决方法或示例。

解答不清晰，无法理解或解决问题。

页面排版不美观，阅读体验差。

文章

问答

视频

教程

学习中心

腾讯云实验室

直播

竞赛

腾讯云代码分析专区

腾讯iOA零信任安全管理系统专区

腾讯云架构师技术同盟交流圈

腾讯云数据库专区

腾讯云智能顾问专区

腾讯云原生专区

腾讯混元专区

腾讯云TCE专区

腾讯云Lighthouse专区

腾讯云HAI专区

腾讯云Edgeone专区

腾讯云存储专区

腾讯云智能专区

腾讯轻联专区 

腾讯云开发专区

TAPD专区

腾讯轻量云游戏服专区

腾讯云最具价值专家

腾讯云架构师技术同盟

腾讯云创作之星

腾讯云开发者先锋

腾讯云AI代码助手

云原生构建

TAPD 敏捷项目管理

Cloud Studio

SDK中心

API中心

命令行工具

功能1上新10个字符

功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符。

功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符。

功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符

功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符

功能4上新

文章&问答评论现已支持表情

全新交互，全新视觉，新增快捷键、悬浮工具栏、高亮块等功能并同时优化现有功能，全面提升创作效率和体验

社区富文本编辑器全新改版！诚邀体验～ 

精选全网热门MCP server，让你的AI更好用 🚀

💥开发者 MCP广场重磅上线！

涵盖代码开发、场景应用、自动测试全流程，助你从零构建专属AI助手

一站式MCP教程库，解锁AI应用新玩法

聚焦“写作效率、视觉美观与运行性能”三方面进行全面升级，为您提供更高效、稳定的创作环境

社区富文本&Markdown编辑器全新改版上线，欢迎大家体验!

诚挚邀请您参与本次调研，分享您的真实使用感受与建议。您的反馈至关重要，感谢您的支持与参与！

社区新版编辑器体验调研

根据和的说法，它是一种设计模式。根据的说法，它是一种架构模式与设计模式相比，架构模式的规模更大。(维基百科- 或者它是一个架构模式，它也有一个设计模式？?。哪一个是正确的？

问MVC是设计模式还是架构模式
EN

回答 10

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问MVC是设计模式还是架构模式EN

回答 10

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问MVC是设计模式还是架构模式
EN