blocks|key|152550|text|在Hal+Varian成为谷歌的首席经济学家之前，他曾在伯克利从事信息技术经济学的工作，尽管他并没有专注于软件开发本身。尽管如此，我还是建议大家看看2001年更一般的主题中的his+paper。你可以在他的网站上找到更完整的his+research+work列表。希望这能有所帮助。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|152551|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hal_Varian|1|http://people.ischool.berkeley.edu/~hal/Papers/mattioli/mattioli.html|2|http://people.ischool.berkeley.edu/~hal/people/hal/papers.html^0|1|A|0|2F|9|1|34|H|2|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@$A|Q|B|R|1|S]|$A|T|B|U|1|V]|$A|W|B|X|1|Y]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|Z|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]|L|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|M]]|N|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|O]]]]

Before <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hal_Varian" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Hal Varian</a> became the Chief Economist at Google, he had worked on the economics of information technology at Berkeley, although he did not focus on software development per se. Nevertheless I would recommend a look at <a href="http://people.ischool.berkeley.edu/~hal/Papers/mattioli/mattioli.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">his paper</a> on the more general topic from 2001. You can find a more complete list of <a href="http://people.ischool.berkeley.edu/~hal/people/hal/papers.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">his research work</a> on his website. Hope that helps.

blocks|key|3369944|text|Software+as+Capital不是在浪费时间，尽管你不会在里面找到任何数学，而且它读起来像PhD论文，因为它是从一篇论文开始的。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|3369945|Another+review.|3369946|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|https://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/com/0818677791|1|http://www.utdallas.edu/~plewin/SoftwareasCapital.htm^0|0|J|0|0|0|F|1|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@$A|Q|B|R|1|S]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|T|8|@]|9|@$A|U|B|V|1|W]]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|X|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|M]]|N|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|O]]]]

<a href="https://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/com/0818677791" rel="nofollow noreferrer" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Software as Capital</a> wasn't a waste of time, though you won't find any math in it and it reads like a PhD thesis because it started as one.

<a href="http://www.utdallas.edu/~plewin/SoftwareasCapital.htm" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Another review.</a>

blocks|key|4216279|text|我认为你要找的东西可能属于sociology+of+software+development...社会学家研究所有现代学科，毫无疑问，你会在那里找到软件开发经济学的参考资料。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|4216280|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|https://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/com/0132366134^0|D|X|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

I think that what you're looking for might fall under a <a href="https://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/com/0132366134" rel="nofollow noreferrer" rel="nofollow noreferrer">sociology of software development</a>... sociologists study all modern subjects, and from there you will no doubt find references to an economics of software development if there is one.

blocks|key|3369856|text|Facts+and+Fallacies+of+Software+Engineering+by+Robert+Glass有一些与某些活动相关的美元金额(或至少占总预算的百分比)。我不知道这有没有帮助，但这是有意义的。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|3369857|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss_gw_0_21?url=search-alias%253Daps&field-keywords=facts%2Band%2Bfallacies%2Bof%2Bsoftware%2Bengineering&x=0&y=0&sprefix=facts%2Band%2Bfallacies%2Bo^0|0|1N|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

<a href="http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss_gw_0_21?url=search-alias%3Daps&amp;field-keywords=facts+and+fallacies+of+software+engineering&amp;x=0&amp;y=0&amp;sprefix=facts+and+fallacies+o" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Facts and Fallacies of Software Engineering by Robert Glass</a> has some dollar amounts associated with some activities (or, at least, percentage of total budget). Don't know if that helps at all, but it's something.

blocks|key|152661|text|几年前，我用瓦里安的书“INFORMATION+RULES”教过一门“电子商务经济学”课程。然而，他的锁定思想几乎将读者引向购买者行为和剥削的吸毒者模型。这本书更多的是电子商务的经济学，而不是软件开发过程的分析。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|152662|在实际制作软件方面，Mythical+Man+Month中有一些想法非常值得了解。|152663|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.inforules.com/|1|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Mythical_Man-Month^0|C|H|0|0|A|I|1|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@$A|Q|B|R|1|S]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|T|8|@]|9|@$A|U|B|V|1|W]]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|X|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|M]]|N|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|O]]]]

Several years ago I taught an "Economics of E-Commerce" course using Varian's book <a href="http://www.inforules.com/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">INFORMATION RULES</a>. His idea of lock-in, though, leads the reader almost towards a drug-addict model of purchaser behaviour and exploitation. This book is more of an economics of e-business than an analysis of the software development process. 

In terms of actually making software, there are ideas in the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Mythical_Man-Month" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Mythical Man Month</a> well worth knowing about.

blocks|key|3370151|text|Douglas+Hubbard的“应用信息经济学”方法可能是你所寻找的一部分。如果我们假设软件开发是(通常%7C总是%7C有时%7C？？)关于通过提供(更好的%7C更准确的%7C更新的)信息来支持决策制定，那么AIE就会有所帮助，因为它是一种量化更好信息价值的技术。阅读Hubbard的《如何测量任何东西》一书，可以很好地了解这一想法。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|3370152|此外，Mark+Denne和Jane+Cleland+Huang所著的“Software+By+Numbers”一书提供了一个管理软件项目的模型，该模型使用了他们所称的“增量资金方法论”。IFM基于基于所创建的业务价值将软件项目分解为功能，而不是沿着技术边界对其进行分解。然后，他们使用基于贴现现金流(DCF)、净现值(NPV)、内部收益率(IRR)等的一系列计算来显示项目在项目生命周期中何时达到自筹资金状态，何时达到“盈亏平衡”，以及何时为组织产生真正的正现金回报。|3370153|您可能还会找到感兴趣的功能案例书。它没有严格地详细处理任何经济问题，但它是一种软件规范的方法，它试图更清楚地将软件功能与业务战略和业务问题相对应。|3370154|entityMap^0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$]]

The "Applied Information Economics" approach of Douglas Hubbard could be part of what you're looking for. If we assume software development is (often|always|sometimes|???) about supporting decision making by providing (better|more accurate|more up to date|whatever) information, then AIE helps as it's a technique for quantifying the value of better information. Read Hubbard's book How to Measure Anything for a good overview of the idea.

Also, the book Software By Numbers by Mark Denne and Jane Cleland-Huang provides a model for managing software projects by using something they call the "Incremental Funding Methodology". IFM is based on decomposing software projects into features based on the business value created, rather than decomposing them along technical boundaries. They then use a series of calculations based on Discounted Cash Flow (DCF), Net Present Value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR), etc. to show when in the project lifecycle the project will reach self-funding status, when it will reach "breakeven" and when it will generate a real positive cash return for the organization.

You might also find the Capability Cases book of interest. It doesn't strictly deal with any economic issues in detail, but it's an approach to software specification which attempts to more clearly map software capabilities to business strategy and business issues.

Can anyone point me towards any references that attempt to formulate an economics of software development? In my own research, I discovered a book by Barry Boehm on this, but it seems very awkward and theoretical.

Dependency Structure Matrices seem to offer something worthwhile. Carliss Baldwin has used these in some work on modularization, boundaries, and transaction costs. A lot of it comes off as just common sense, though.

Also, economists have developed something called Behavioral Economics. Is there a "Behavioral Software Engineering" that addresses cognitive biases in developers or groups of developers?

Here's an interesting looking reference: 
<a href="https://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/com/3639100840" rel="nofollow noreferrer" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://www.amazon.com/Knowledge-Sharing-Software-Development-Comparing/dp/3639100840/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1232979573&amp;sr=1-1</a>

Economics of software development

翻译质量差，导致语言生硬或混乱。

没有提供实际的解决方法或示例。

解答不清晰，无法理解或解决问题。

页面排版不美观，阅读体验差。

文章

问答

视频

教程

学习中心

腾讯云实验室

直播

竞赛

腾讯云代码分析专区

腾讯iOA零信任安全管理系统专区

腾讯云架构师技术同盟交流圈

腾讯云数据库专区

腾讯云智能顾问专区

腾讯云原生专区

腾讯混元专区

腾讯云TCE专区

腾讯云Lighthouse专区

腾讯云HAI专区

腾讯云Edgeone专区

腾讯云存储专区

腾讯云智能专区

腾讯轻联专区 

腾讯云开发专区

TAPD专区

腾讯轻量云游戏服专区

腾讯云最具价值专家

腾讯云架构师技术同盟

腾讯云创作之星

腾讯云开发者先锋

腾讯云AI代码助手

云原生构建

TAPD 敏捷项目管理

Cloud Studio

SDK中心

API中心

命令行工具

功能1上新10个字符

功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符。

功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符。

功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符

功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符

功能4上新

文章&问答评论现已支持表情

全新交互，全新视觉，新增快捷键、悬浮工具栏、高亮块等功能并同时优化现有功能，全面提升创作效率和体验

社区富文本编辑器全新改版！诚邀体验～ 

精选全网热门MCP server，让你的AI更好用 🚀

💥开发者 MCP广场重磅上线！

涵盖代码开发、场景应用、自动测试全流程，助你从零构建专属AI助手

一站式MCP教程库，解锁AI应用新玩法

聚焦“写作效率、视觉美观与运行性能”三方面进行全面升级，为您提供更高效、稳定的创作环境

社区富文本&Markdown编辑器全新改版上线，欢迎大家体验!

诚挚邀请您参与本次调研，分享您的真实使用感受与建议。您的反馈至关重要，感谢您的支持与参与！

社区新版编辑器体验调研

有没有人能给我推荐一些试图阐述软件开发经济学的参考资料？在我自己的研究中，我发现了Barry Boehm关于这一点的一本书，但它似乎非常笨拙和理论。依赖结构矩阵似乎提供了一些有价值的东西。Carliss Baldwin在一些关于模块化、边界和交易成本的工作中使用了这些。不过，其中很多都是常识。此外，经济学家还发展了一种叫做行为经济学的东西。是否存在“行为软件工程”来解决开发人员或开发人员组中的认知

问软件开发经济学
EN

回答 6

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问软件开发经济学EN

回答 6

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问软件开发经济学
EN