blocks|key|109120|text|OpenSourceTesting.com有一个list+of+OSS+performance+tools。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|109121|软件测试常见问题解答也有一个list+of+commercial+and+OSS+performance+testing+tools。|109122|由于您使用的是Windows平台，因此您还可以使用以下工具：|109123|109124|Visual+Studio+(Enterprise+Editions+only?)|unordered-list-item|109125|Microsoft+Web+Application+Stress+tool+(又名WAS，又名"Homer"；应用程序中心测试的前身)|109126|109127|有很多选择，但看起来你已经很好地处理了你的需求。我建议对你的首选做一个行业研究，使用加权标准和每种产品得分的排名(有点像自定义的“消费者报告”风格比较)。这将帮助您减少对产品的任何先入为主的观念，并为您的管理人员提供一个合理的经验理由，说明您为什么选择您所做的工具。这可以在很大程度上证明一个大项目的成本。|109128|此外，对于商业工具，供应商通常会来现场设置一个演示系统来测试您的代码。几年前，我们用水星、Rational和NuMega做到了这一点。它确实帮助我们简化了演示文稿B.S.，并准确地了解了如何将产品与我们的应用程序一起使用。|109129|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.opensourcetesting.org/performance.php|1|http://www.testingfaqs.org/t-load.html|2|http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=e2c0585a-062a-439e-a67d-75a89aa36495&displaylang=en^0|O|T|0|0|E|1G|1|0|0|0|0|A|M|2|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|14|8|@]|9|@$A|15|B|16|1|17]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|18|8|@]|9|@$A|19|B|1A|1|1B]]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|1C|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|1D|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|I|3|J|5|K|7|1E|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|L|3|M|5|K|7|1F|8|@]|9|@$A|1G|B|1H|1|1I]]|C|$]]|$1|N|3|-4|5|6|7|1J|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|O|3|P|5|6|7|1K|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|Q|3|R|5|6|7|1L|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|S|3|-4|5|6|7|1M|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|T|$U|$5|V|W|X|C|$Y|Z]]|10|$5|V|W|X|C|$Y|11]]|12|$5|V|W|X|C|$Y|13]]]]

OpenSourceTesting.com has a <a href="http://www.opensourcetesting.org/performance.php" rel="nofollow noreferrer">list of OSS performance tools</a>.

The Software Testing FAQ also has a <a href="http://www.testingfaqs.org/t-load.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">list of commercial and OSS performance testing tools</a>.

Since it looks like you're on a Windows platform, you can also use the following tools:

<ul>
<li>Visual Studio <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa287410.aspx" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Application Center Test</a> (Enterprise Editions only?)</li>
<li>Microsoft <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=e2c0585a-062a-439e-a67d-75a89aa36495&amp;displaylang=en" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Web Application Stress</a> tool (aka WAS, aka "Homer"; predecessor to Application Center Test)</li>
</ul>

There are a lot of options out there, but it seems like you have a good handle on your requirements. I recommend doing a trade study of your top choices, using weighted criteria and a rank of how each product scores (sort of like a custom "Consumer Reports" style comparison). This will help you reduce any preconceived notions towards or against a product, and also gives your management a sound empirical reason as to why you choose the tool you did. This can go a long way in justifying the cost for a big ticket item.

Also, for the commercial tools, the vendors will often come on site and set up a demo system to test your code. We did this a few years back with Mercury, Rational and NuMega. It really helped cut through the presentation B.S. and see exactly how the products could be used with our apps.

blocks|key|3327265|text|我们使用JMeter进行超文本传输协议和SOAP负载测试|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|3327266|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://jakarta.apache.org/jmeter/^0|4|6|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

We have used <a href="http://jakarta.apache.org/jmeter/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">JMeter</a> for HTTP and SOAP load testing

blocks|key|109062|text|来自自动化QA的TestComplete也备受推崇：|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|109063|http://www.automatedqa.com|offset|length|109064|该产品功能全面，您可以使用包括C#在内的多种语言编写脚本。我会尝试30天的试用期，以及它与LoadRunner在满足您的特定需求方面的比较。|109065|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.automatedqa.com/^0|0|0|Q|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|Q|8|@]|9|@$D|R|E|S|1|T]]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|U|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|V|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|I|$J|$5|K|L|M|A|$N|O]]]]

TestComplete from Automated QA is also very well respected:

<a href="http://www.automatedqa.com" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://www.automatedqa.com</a>

The product is comprehensive and you can script it in a variety of languages including C#. I'd try the 30-day trial and how it compares to LoadRunner for your specific requirements.

blocks|key|3327316|text|我用过openSTA。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|3327317|这允许记录与网站的会话，然后通过相对简单的脚本语言回放。|3327318|您可以轻松地测试web服务并编写自己的脚本。|3327319|它允许您以任何想要的方式在测试中将脚本放在一起，并配置迭代的数量、每次迭代中的用户数、引入每个新用户的提升时间以及每次迭代之间的延迟。测试也可以安排在未来。|3327320|它是开源的，而且是免费的。|3327321|它可以生成许多报告，可以保存到电子表格中。然后，我们使用数据透视表来轻松地分析和绘制结果。|3327322|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.opensta.org/%2522openSTA%2522^0|3|7|0|0|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|V|8|@]|9|@$A|W|B|X|1|Y]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|Z|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|10|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|11|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|J|3|K|5|6|7|12|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|L|3|M|5|6|7|13|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|N|3|-4|5|6|7|14|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|O|$P|$5|Q|R|S|C|$T|U]]]]

I've used <a href="http://www.opensta.org/&quot;openSTA&quot;" rel="nofollow noreferrer">openSTA</a>.

This allows a session with a web site to be recorded and then played back via a relatively simple script language.

You can easily test web services and write your own scripts.

It allows you to put scripts together in a test in any way you want and configure the number of iterations, the number of users in each iteration, the ramp up time to introduce each new user and the delay between each iteration. Tests can also be scheduled in the future.

It's open source and free.

It produces a number of reports which can be saved to a spreadsheet. We then use a pivot table to easily analyse and graph the results.

blocks|key|921366|text|我在以前的项目中使用过WebLOAD+-它与LoadRunner相当，但更具成本效益。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|921367|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.radview.com/^0|B|7|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

I have used <a href="http://www.radview.com/" rel="nofollow">WebLOAD</a> in previous projects - it's comparable to LoadRunner, but more cost-effective.

blocks|key|109183|text|如果你必须注意到所有的接口，那么你只会看到商业工具。在商业领域最接近的可比产品是Microfocus的SilkPerformer产品，但你的接口的广度可能会把你推回Loadrunner领域，因为它确实拥有所有工具中最多的开箱即用协议支持。从企业销售的角度来看，这是它的一个显著特点。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|109184|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

It you must have all of the interfaces noted, then you are only going to be looking at commercial tools. The closest comparable in the commercial space is Microfocus' SilkPerformer product, but the breadth of your interfaces may push you back into the Loadrunner space, as it does have the greatest number of out of the box protocols supported of any tool out there. This is one of its distinguishing features from an enterprise sale perspective.

I am working on a proposal for my company into purchasing some load testing software. I have to give 2 choices. One of my choices I am proposing is HP(Mecurary) Loadrunner. Is there another program out there that is comparible with Loadrunner? We are looking at using the software to test the performance of the following. 

C# .NET Template

Microsoft® .NET 2.0, 3.0

Microsoft® SQL Server Informix

Web (HTTP/HTML)

Web Services

Web and Multimedia

Wireless Application Protocol (WAP)

Domain Name System (DNS)

Microsoft® Exchange (MAPI)

Load Testing Software

翻译质量差，导致语言生硬或混乱。

没有提供实际的解决方法或示例。

解答不清晰，无法理解或解决问题。

页面排版不美观，阅读体验差。

文章

问答

视频

教程

学习中心

腾讯云实验室

直播

竞赛

腾讯云代码分析专区

腾讯iOA零信任安全管理系统专区

腾讯云架构师技术同盟交流圈

腾讯云数据库专区

腾讯云智能顾问专区

腾讯云原生专区

腾讯混元专区

腾讯云TCE专区

腾讯云Lighthouse专区

腾讯云HAI专区

腾讯云Edgeone专区

腾讯云存储专区

腾讯云智能专区

腾讯轻联专区 

腾讯云开发专区

TAPD专区

腾讯轻量云游戏服专区

腾讯云最具价值专家

腾讯云架构师技术同盟

腾讯云创作之星

腾讯云开发者先锋

腾讯云AI代码助手

云原生构建

TAPD 敏捷项目管理

Cloud Studio

SDK中心

API中心

命令行工具

功能1上新10个字符

功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符。

功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符。

功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符

功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符

功能4上新

文章&问答评论现已支持表情

全新交互，全新视觉，新增快捷键、悬浮工具栏、高亮块等功能并同时优化现有功能，全面提升创作效率和体验

社区富文本编辑器全新改版！诚邀体验～ 

精选全网热门MCP server，让你的AI更好用 🚀

💥开发者 MCP广场重磅上线！

涵盖代码开发、场景应用、自动测试全流程，助你从零构建专属AI助手

一站式MCP教程库，解锁AI应用新玩法

聚焦“写作效率、视觉美观与运行性能”三方面进行全面升级，为您提供更高效、稳定的创作环境

社区富文本&Markdown编辑器全新改版上线，欢迎大家体验!

诚挚邀请您参与本次调研，分享您的真实使用感受与建议。您的反馈至关重要，感谢您的支持与参与！

社区新版编辑器体验调研

我正在为我的公司购买一些负载测试软件的提案工作。我必须给你两个选择。我建议的其中一个选择是HP(Mecurary) Loadrunner。有没有别的程序可以和Loadrunner相提并论？我们正在考虑使用该软件来测试以下各项的性能。C# .NET模板微软®.NET 2.0、3.0Microsoft®SQL Server InformixWeb (HTTP/HTML)Web服务Web和多媒体无线应用

问负载测试软件
EN

回答 6

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问负载测试软件EN

回答 6

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问负载测试软件
EN