这对我来说似乎很嘈杂。五条线路的开销太大了。
m_Lock.EnterReadLock()
Try
Return m_List.Count
Finally
m_Lock.ExitReadLock()
End Try那么,您如何简化这一过程呢?
发布于 2008-10-04 09:24:23
我也是这么想的,但在C# ;-p
using System;
using System.Threading;
class Program
{
static void Main()
{
ReaderWriterLockSlim sync = new ReaderWriterLockSlim();
using (sync.Read())
{
// etc
}
}
}
public static class ReaderWriterExt
{
sealed class ReadLockToken : IDisposable
{
private ReaderWriterLockSlim sync;
public ReadLockToken(ReaderWriterLockSlim sync)
{
this.sync = sync;
sync.EnterReadLock();
}
public void Dispose()
{
if (sync != null)
{
sync.ExitReadLock();
sync = null;
}
}
}
public static IDisposable Read(this ReaderWriterLockSlim obj)
{
return new ReadLockToken(obj);
}
}发布于 2010-08-04 22:24:13
到目前为止,所有发布的解决方案都有死锁的风险。像这样的using块:
ReaderWriterLockSlim sync = new ReaderWriterLockSlim();
using (sync.Read())
{
// Do stuff
}被转换成类似这样的内容:
ReaderWriterLockSlim sync = new ReaderWriterLockSlim();
IDisposable d = sync.Read();
try
{
// Do stuff
}
finally
{
d.Dispose();
}这意味着在sync.Read()和try块之间可能会发生ThreadAbortException (或类似的)。当这种情况发生时,finally块永远不会被调用,锁也永远不会被释放!
有关更多信息和更好的实现,请参阅:Deadlock with ReaderWriterLockSlim and other lock objects。简而言之,更好的实现归根结底是将锁移动到try块中,如下所示:
ReaderWriterLockSlim myLock = new ReaderWriterLockSlim();
try
{
myLock.EnterReadLock();
// Do stuff
}
finally
{
// Release the lock
myLock.ExitReadLock();
}类似于接受答案中的包装器class将是:
/// <summary>
/// Manager for a lock object that acquires and releases the lock in a manner
/// that avoids the common problem of deadlock within the using block
/// initialisation.
/// </summary>
/// <remarks>
/// This manager object is, by design, not itself thread-safe.
/// </remarks>
public sealed class ReaderWriterLockMgr : IDisposable
{
/// <summary>
/// Local reference to the lock object managed
/// </summary>
private ReaderWriterLockSlim _readerWriterLock = null;
private enum LockTypes { None, Read, Write, Upgradeable }
/// <summary>
/// The type of lock acquired by this manager
/// </summary>
private LockTypes _enteredLockType = LockTypes.None;
/// <summary>
/// Manager object construction that does not acquire any lock
/// </summary>
/// <param name="ReaderWriterLock">The lock object to manage</param>
public ReaderWriterLockMgr(ReaderWriterLockSlim ReaderWriterLock)
{
if (ReaderWriterLock == null)
throw new ArgumentNullException("ReaderWriterLock");
_readerWriterLock = ReaderWriterLock;
}
/// <summary>
/// Call EnterReadLock on the managed lock
/// </summary>
public void EnterReadLock()
{
if (_readerWriterLock == null)
throw new ObjectDisposedException(GetType().FullName);
if (_enteredLockType != LockTypes.None)
throw new InvalidOperationException("Create a new ReaderWriterLockMgr for each state you wish to enter");
// Allow exceptions by the Enter* call to propogate
// and prevent updating of _enteredLockType
_readerWriterLock.EnterReadLock();
_enteredLockType = LockTypes.Read;
}
/// <summary>
/// Call EnterWriteLock on the managed lock
/// </summary>
public void EnterWriteLock()
{
if (_readerWriterLock == null)
throw new ObjectDisposedException(GetType().FullName);
if (_enteredLockType != LockTypes.None)
throw new InvalidOperationException("Create a new ReaderWriterLockMgr for each state you wish to enter");
// Allow exceptions by the Enter* call to propogate
// and prevent updating of _enteredLockType
_readerWriterLock.EnterWriteLock();
_enteredLockType = LockTypes.Write;
}
/// <summary>
/// Call EnterUpgradeableReadLock on the managed lock
/// </summary>
public void EnterUpgradeableReadLock()
{
if (_readerWriterLock == null)
throw new ObjectDisposedException(GetType().FullName);
if (_enteredLockType != LockTypes.None)
throw new InvalidOperationException("Create a new ReaderWriterLockMgr for each state you wish to enter");
// Allow exceptions by the Enter* call to propogate
// and prevent updating of _enteredLockType
_readerWriterLock.EnterUpgradeableReadLock();
_enteredLockType = LockTypes.Upgradeable;
}
/// <summary>
/// Exit the lock, allowing re-entry later on whilst this manager is in scope
/// </summary>
/// <returns>Whether the lock was previously held</returns>
public bool ExitLock()
{
switch (_enteredLockType)
{
case LockTypes.Read:
_readerWriterLock.ExitReadLock();
_enteredLockType = LockTypes.None;
return true;
case LockTypes.Write:
_readerWriterLock.ExitWriteLock();
_enteredLockType = LockTypes.None;
return true;
case LockTypes.Upgradeable:
_readerWriterLock.ExitUpgradeableReadLock();
_enteredLockType = LockTypes.None;
return true;
}
return false;
}
/// <summary>
/// Dispose of the lock manager, releasing any lock held
/// </summary>
public void Dispose()
{
if (_readerWriterLock != null)
{
ExitLock();
// Tidy up managed resources
// Release reference to the lock so that it gets garbage collected
// when there are no more references to it
_readerWriterLock = null;
// Call GC.SupressFinalize to take this object off the finalization
// queue and prevent finalization code for this object from
// executing a second time.
GC.SuppressFinalize(this);
}
}
protected ~ReaderWriterLockMgr()
{
if (_readerWriterLock != null)
ExitLock();
// Leave references to managed resources so that the garbage collector can follow them
}
}使用方法如下:
ReaderWriterLockSlim myLock = new ReaderWriterLockSlim();
using (ReaderWriterLockMgr lockMgr = new ReaderWriterLockMgr(myLock))
{
lockMgr.EnterReadLock();
// Do stuff
}另外,来自Joe Duffy's Blog
接下来,锁对异步异常(如线程中止和内存不足)的健壮性不强。如果其中一个发生在锁的某个方法中,锁状态可能会被破坏,从而导致随后的死锁、未处理的异常,以及(可悲的)由于在内部使用自旋锁而导致的100% CPU挂起。因此,如果你打算在一个经常使用线程中止或试图在硬OOM中幸存下来的环境中运行你的代码,你不会对这个锁感到满意。
发布于 2008-11-25 14:06:55
这不是我的发明,但它确实让头发不那么灰白了。
internal static class ReaderWriteLockExtensions
{
private struct Disposable : IDisposable
{
private readonly Action m_action;
private Sentinel m_sentinel;
public Disposable(Action action)
{
m_action = action;
m_sentinel = new Sentinel();
}
public void Dispose()
{
m_action();
GC.SuppressFinalize(m_sentinel);
}
}
private class Sentinel
{
~Sentinel()
{
throw new InvalidOperationException("Lock not properly disposed.");
}
}
public static IDisposable AcquireReadLock(this ReaderWriterLockSlim lock)
{
lock.EnterReadLock();
return new Disposable(lock.ExitReadLock);
}
public static IDisposable AcquireUpgradableReadLock(this ReaderWriterLockSlim lock)
{
lock.EnterUpgradeableReadLock();
return new Disposable(lock.ExitUpgradeableReadLock);
}
public static IDisposable AcquireWriteLock(this ReaderWriterLockSlim lock)
{
lock.EnterWriteLock();
return new Disposable(lock.ExitWriteLock);
}
} 使用方法:
using (m_lock.AcquireReadLock())
{
// Do stuff
}https://stackoverflow.com/questions/170028
复制相似问题