blocks|key|67158|text|对于C%2B%2B，Scott+Meyers+books是非常好的，并将帮助您进入下一个级别。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|67159|如果你还没有，C%2B%2B+by+Bjarne+Stroustrup,+3rd+Edition|67160|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.aristeia.com/books.html|1|https://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/com/0201700735^0|6|I|0|0|7|11|1|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@$A|Q|B|R|1|S]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|T|8|@]|9|@$A|U|B|V|1|W]]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|X|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|M]]|N|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|O]]]]

For C++, <a href="http://www.aristeia.com/books.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Scott Meyers books</a> are very good, and will help take you to the next level.

If you don't already have it <a href="https://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/com/0201700735" rel="nofollow noreferrer" rel="nofollow noreferrer">C++ by Bjarne Stroustrup, 3rd Edition</a>

blocks|key|3288830|text|我会从Pragmatic+Programmer、Code+Complete、Refactoring和Design+Patterns开始。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|3288831|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.pragprog.com/the-pragmatic-programmer|1|http://cc2e.com/|2|http://www.refactoring.com/|3|http://www.dofactory.com/Patterns/Patterns.aspx^0|3|K|0|O|D|1|12|B|2|1E|F|3|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@$A|S|B|T|1|U]|$A|V|B|W|1|X]|$A|Y|B|Z|1|10]|$A|11|B|12|1|13]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|14|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]|L|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|M]]|N|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|O]]|P|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|Q]]]]

I would start with the <a href="http://www.pragprog.com/the-pragmatic-programmer" rel="noreferrer">Pragmatic Programmer</a>, <a href="http://cc2e.com/" rel="noreferrer">Code Complete</a>, <a href="http://www.refactoring.com/" rel="noreferrer">Refactoring</a> and <a href="http://www.dofactory.com/Patterns/Patterns.aspx" rel="noreferrer">Design Patterns</a>.

blocks|key|896852|text|嗯..。Teach+Yourself+Programming+in+Ten+Years+(Peter+Norvig)|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|896853|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://norvig.com/21-days.html^0|4|1I|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

Uhm... <a href="http://norvig.com/21-days.html" rel="noreferrer">Teach Yourself Programming in Ten Years (Peter Norvig)</a>

blocks|key|3288862|text|用了3个月的c%2B%2B，你已经适应了吗？天哪，我学习c#已经一年多了，还上了很多微软的课程，我对它一点也不舒服。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|3288863|话虽如此，你会听到Code+Complete被认为是一本非常好的书。我现在正在读这篇文章。|offset|length|3288864|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|https://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/com/0735619670^0|0|9|D|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|O|8|@]|9|@$D|P|E|Q|1|R]]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|A|$L|M]]]]

3 months into c++ and you're already comfortable with it? Sheesh, I've been learning c# for over a year and have taken numerous Microsoft courses and I'm nowhere near comfortable with it.

That being said, you'll hear <a href="https://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/com/0735619670" rel="nofollow noreferrer" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Code Complete</a> tossed about as a very good book. I'm in the process of reading it now.

blocks|key|3288896|text|萨特·马歇尔·克莱恩的C%2B%2B+FAQ+Lite.|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|3288897|Herb+Exceptional+C%2B%2B.|unordered-list-item|3288898|
+|3288899|3288900|3288901|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.parashift.com/c%2B%2B-faq-lite/|1|https://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/com/0201615622^0|B|C|0|0|5|F|1|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|U|8|@]|9|@$A|V|B|W|1|X]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|F|7|Y|8|@]|9|@$A|Z|B|10|1|11]]|C|$]]|$1|G|3|H|5|6|7|12|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|I|3|-4|5|F|7|13|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|J|3|-4|5|6|7|14|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|K|3|-4|5|6|7|15|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|L|$M|$5|N|O|P|C|$Q|R]]|S|$5|N|O|P|C|$Q|T]]]]

<ul>
<li>Marshall Cline's <a href="http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lite/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">C++ FAQ Lite</a>.</li>
<li>Herb Sutter's <a href="https://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/com/0201615622" rel="nofollow noreferrer" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Exceptional C++</a>.</li>
</ul>

blocks|key|4133899|text|John+Lakos的Large+Scale+C%2B%2B+Software+Design给出了一些设计方法的指导，这些方法将使您的C%2B%2B更易于维护。它是相当强大的，但你可以尝试一下，仍然可以获得一些好处。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|4133900|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

Large Scale C++ Software Design by John Lakos gives guidance on design methods that will make your C++ more maintainable. It is pretty hefty but you can dip in and still get some benefits.

blocks|key|902284|text|有些离题:我不是建议学习书籍，而是要提到一些需要考虑的广泛主题。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|902285|902286|线程。如果您使用MFC，则这一点需求不大，但在许多其他领域，它是必不可少的。线程API的机制很容易掌握，但是学习所有的特殊情况需要花费大量的时间和practice.|unordered-list-item|902287|Closures，映射减少和其他类似lisp的技术。了解它们是什么，为什么在C%2B%2B中不支持它们，以及如何在C%2B%2B中模仿它们(函数器和许多其他有状态回调对象的情况)。为此，我实际上有一本书：“计算机程序的结构和解释”。|902288|命令行。这可以让你知道什么时候不需要编写自己的程序。命令行应该是Unix命令行--我不知道微软在这方面的最新实验，但cmd.exe太糟糕了。获取Cygwin并启动experimenting.|902289|Scripting语言。这让你知道什么时候不能用C%2B%2B编程。我最喜欢的是Perl，但很多人都说Python、Ruby之类的。嘿，如果你有兴趣的话，学习一下XSLT吧！|902290|902291|我确信我遗漏了其他方面。我会将其标记为社区维基--请随意添加。|902292|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|Q|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|C|3|D|5|E|7|S|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|E|7|T|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|E|7|U|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|K|5|E|7|V|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|L|3|-4|5|6|7|W|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|M|3|N|5|6|7|X|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|O|3|-4|5|6|7|Y|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|P|$]]

Somewhat off-topic: rather than suggesting books to learn, I'd like to mention some broad topics to consider.

<ul>
<li>Threading. This one is not much in demand if you use MFC, but in many other areas it's indispensable. The mechanics of threading APIs are easy to pick up, but learning all the corner cases takes a lot of time and practice.</li>
<li>Closures, Map-Reduce and other lisp-like techniques. Find out what they are, why they are not supported in C++, and how they are imitated in C++ (functors, and many other cases of stateful callback objects). For this I actually have a book: "Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs". </li>
<li>Command Line. This gives you an idea on when not to code your own programs. Command line would be Unix command line - I don't know about MS's latest experimentation in this are, but cmd.exe is awful. Get Cygwin and start experimenting.</li>
<li>Scripting languages. This gives you an idea on when not program in C++. My favorite is Perl, but many people say Python, Ruby and whatnot. Hey, learn XSLT if you're so inclined!</li>
</ul>

I am sure I left out other areas. I'll mark this as Community Wiki - feel free to add.

blocks|key|4133861|text|优秀的博客：Guru+of+the+Week和all+the+books+by+Herb+Sutter。这些已经让你有相当多的东西要考虑了。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|4133862|Modern+C%2B%2B+Design+by+Alexandrescu如果你想对你还不知道的东西有一个很好的感觉，可能也不想知道。|4133863|Code+Kata是用来练习的！|4133864|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.gotw.ca/publications/index.htm|1|2|https://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/com/0201704315|3|http://codekata.pragprog.com/^0|6|G|0|N|S|1|0|0|H|2|0|0|9|3|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|U|8|@]|9|@$A|V|B|W|1|X]|$A|Y|B|Z|1|10]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|11|8|@]|9|@$A|12|B|13|1|14]]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|15|8|@]|9|@$A|16|B|17|1|18]]|C|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|19|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|I|$J|$5|K|L|M|C|$N|O]]|P|$5|K|L|M|C|$N|O]]|Q|$5|K|L|M|C|$N|R]]|S|$5|K|L|M|C|$N|T]]]]

Good blogs:
<a href="http://www.gotw.ca/publications/index.htm" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Guru of the Week</a>, and <a href="http://www.gotw.ca/publications/index.htm" rel="nofollow noreferrer">all the books by Herb Sutter</a>. Those will give you quite a lot to chew already.

<a href="https://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/com/0201704315" rel="nofollow noreferrer" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Modern C++ Design</a> by Alexandrescu if you want to get a good feel for what you don't yet know, and probably don't want to know.

<a href="http://codekata.pragprog.com/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Code Kata</a>'s for practice!

blocks|key|67445|text|我已经读过几本关于VB.net的oreilly书籍(不完整，但有一部分)，它们相当不错，但如果你想成为专业人士并有时间……你可以尝试MSDN论坛，帮助其他人，与他们讨论困难和复杂的问题，我认为这是最好的方式。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|67446|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

I have read several (not complete but some parts) of oreilly books on VB.net they are quite good, but if you want to be pro and have the time...
You can try out MSDN forums, help other people and discuss with them hard and complex problems, I think it's the best way..

blocks|key|896908|text|学习另一门语言。即使你不会使用它，它也能让你开阔脑筋。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|896909|我建议使用Lua、Scheme和Python。但几乎任何其他的东西都可以。(与C语言最不同的是，最好的)|896910|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

learn another language. even if you won't use it, it's great for mind-opening.

I'd advice Lua, Scheme and Python. but almost anything else would do. (the most different from C, the best)

blocks|key|4134071|text|Josuttis和Vandevoorde+-模板:完整指南|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|4134072|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

Josuttis and Vandevoorde - Templates: The Complete Guide

blocks|key|3289180|text|据我所知，没有人提到Bruce+Eckel的杰作"Thinking+in+C%2B%2B“。我的天，这是开始C%2B%2B开发的最好的书之一。在我看来，第一卷比第二卷更有帮助，但两者都值得一读。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|3289181|http://www.amazon.com/Thinking-C-Introduction-Standard-One/dp/0139798099/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1227890306&sr=8-1|offset|length|3289182|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|https://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/com/0139798099^0|0|0|3I|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|O|8|@]|9|@$D|P|E|Q|1|R]]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|A|$L|M]]]]

As I see, nobody mentioned Bruce Eckel brilliant books "Thinking in C++". IMHO, it`s one of the best books to start your C++ development from. From my point of view, first volume is more helpful that the second, but both of them worth reading. 
<a href="https://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/com/0139798099" rel="nofollow noreferrer" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://www.amazon.com/Thinking-C-Introduction-Standard-One/dp/0139798099/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1227890306&amp;sr=8-1</a>

blocks|key|902352|text|我觉得很多人可以推荐更现代的、最新的书。但我还是推荐玛格丽特·A·埃利斯和比亚恩·斯特劳斯特鲁普合著的The+Annotated+C%2B%2B+Reference+Manual。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|902353|ARM是在90年代发布的。它在模板方面已经有点过时了。(显然)+STL是不存在的。(Though+the+website+at+sgi.com+does+a+good+job+of+covering+STL!)|902354|然而，手臂是非常便宜的(二手)。(运费将超过图书的成本。)它的信噪比仍然不在范围之内。它非常擅长挖掘C%2B%2B的脏区，解释所做的事情和原因。|902355|我仍然使用它作为参考。我把它和K&R一起排在那里。|902356|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|https://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/com/0201514591|1|http://www.sgi.com/tech/stl/table_of_contents.html|2|https://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/com/0131103628^0|1F|Y|0|0|16|1Q|1|0|0|F|3|2|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|V|8|@]|9|@$A|W|B|X|1|Y]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|Z|8|@]|9|@$A|10|B|11|1|12]]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|13|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|14|8|@]|9|@$A|15|B|16|1|17]]|C|$]]|$1|J|3|-4|5|6|7|18|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|K|$L|$5|M|N|O|C|$P|Q]]|R|$5|M|N|O|C|$P|S]]|T|$5|M|N|O|C|$P|U]]]]

I lot of folks can suggest more modern, up-to-date books. But I still recommend <a href="https://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/com/0201514591" rel="nofollow noreferrer" rel="nofollow noreferrer">The Annotated C++ Reference Manual</a> by Margaret A. Ellis &amp; Bjarne Stroustrup.

The ARM was published back in '90. It's become somewhat outdated with respect to templates. STL is (obviously) absent. (<a href="http://www.sgi.com/tech/stl/table_of_contents.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Though the website at sgi.com does a good job of covering STL!</a>)

However, the ARM is dirt cheap (used). (Shipping will exceed the cost of the book.) Its signal-to-noise ratio remains off the scale. It's very good at digging into C++'s dirty areas, explaining what was done &amp; why.

I still use it as a reference. I rank it up there with <a href="https://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/com/0131103628" rel="nofollow noreferrer" rel="nofollow noreferrer">K&amp;R</a>.

blocks|key|4134224|text|Dietel/Dietel“如何编程C%2B%2B"...我桌上还有这本书(10年过去了)。每隔一段时间我就会重读一章。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|4134225|正如其他人所建议的那样，我肯定会完成代码。事实上，先读一读吧。|4134226|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

Dietel/Dietel "How to program C++"... I still have this book on my desk (10 years in).. Every once and a while I re-read a chapter. I'd definatly get the Code Complete, as other have suggested. Infact read that first.

blocks|key|4134267|text|为了更好地理解面向对象，可以花一些时间在Smalltalk中。Squeak是免费下载的。然后阅读Richard+P.Gabriel的软件模式，然后他的对象就失败了。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|4134268|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

To get a better understanding of object orientation, spend some time in a Smalltalk. Squeak is a free download. Then read Richard P. Gabriel's Patterns of Software and thereafter his Objects have Failed.

blocks|key|67746|text|思考C%2B%2B+-+Bruce+Eckel+Symfonia+C%2B%2B标准-+Jerzy+Grębosz|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|67747|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

Thinking in C++ - Bruce Eckel
Symfonia C++ Standard - Jerzy Grębosz

blocks|key|67802|text|如果你什么也不做，那就编程吧。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|67803|当你没有读过关于编程的文章时，当你对某件事感兴趣时，就去用这些知识去实现一些东西。我发现这是真正设置主体的唯一方法。|67804|在博客上保持最新状态可能很有趣，但它是分散的知识。它似乎分散了注意力，而不是帮助。但是，结合谷歌和对特定研究的渴望，确实可以提供大量的信息。但是不要只是订阅了很多rss提要，然后就期望变得更好。|67805|我认为真正学习特定的主题有助于扩展你的能力。研究你感兴趣的话题，遇到像你这样的人(会议，用户组，irc，facebook，stackoverflow等)，最重要的是实践你的艺术。|67806|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|M|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|I|$]]

If you do nothing else, program. 

When you are not doing that read about programming and when something strikes you as interesting, go implement something with that knowledge. I've found that this is the only way to really set the principals. 

Staying up to date on blogs can be fun, but it is scattered knowledge. It seems to distract more than help. But combined with google and a desire to research something specific can really cough up tons of information. But dont' just subscribe to alot of rss feeds and expect to get better.

I think really studying specific topics helps expand your ability. Research topics that intrigue you, meet people doing things like you (conferences, user groups, irc, facebook, stackoverflow, etc) and above all practice your art.

blocks|key|3289503|text|您可以查看Boost库和许多关于它的书籍。虽然这可能不是您想要的，但Boost库是设计良好的现代C%2B%2B库的示例，它们使用该语言的功能，几乎就是为其问题领域创建最有效的解决方案的方式。当然，也有像预处理器和MPL这样的奇形怪状的库，这让你想知道你是否会用到它们，但它们都很好。从我自己的经验来看，探索这个库和它的文献让我对如何有效地使用C%2B%2B有了深入的了解。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|3289504|Boost+Beyond+the+C%2B%2B+Standard+Library:+An+Introduction+to+Boost|offset|length|3289505|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.boost.org/|1|https://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/com/0321133544^0|0|0|5|0|6|1L|1|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|Q|8|@]|9|@$D|R|E|S|1|T]|$D|U|E|V|1|W]]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|X|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|A|$L|M]]|N|$5|I|J|K|A|$L|O]]]]

You can check out the Boost library and a number of the books written about it. While this may not have been what you had in mind, IMO, the Boost libraries are examples of well-designed modern C++ libraries that use the features of the language in pretty much the way they should be used to create among the most effective solutions for their problem domain. Granted of course, there are bizarre libraries like preprocessor and MPL which make you wonder if you'll ever have any use for them, but they're all round quite good. From my own experience, exploring the library and its literature has given me insight into how C++ can be used effectively.

<a href="http://www.boost.org/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Boost</a>
<a href="https://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/com/0321133544" rel="nofollow noreferrer" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Beyond the C++ Standard Library: An Introduction to Boost</a>

I have been learning C++ for three months now and in that time created a number of applications for my company. I consider myself fairly comfortable with C++ / MFC and STL, however I don't just want to be an OK programmer, I want to be a good programmer. I have a few books on best practices but I was wondering if anyone could suggest reading materials that helped them and any disciplines which should be encouraged?

Thanks!

Developing as a programmer

翻译质量差，导致语言生硬或混乱。

没有提供实际的解决方法或示例。

解答不清晰，无法理解或解决问题。

页面排版不美观，阅读体验差。

文章

问答

视频

教程

学习中心

腾讯云实验室

直播

竞赛

腾讯云代码分析专区

腾讯iOA零信任安全管理系统专区

腾讯云架构师技术同盟交流圈

腾讯云数据库专区

腾讯云智能顾问专区

腾讯云原生专区

腾讯混元专区

腾讯云TCE专区

腾讯云Lighthouse专区

腾讯云HAI专区

腾讯云Edgeone专区

腾讯云存储专区

腾讯云智能专区

腾讯轻联专区 

腾讯云开发专区

TAPD专区

腾讯轻量云游戏服专区

腾讯云最具价值专家

腾讯云架构师技术同盟

腾讯云创作之星

腾讯云开发者先锋

腾讯云AI代码助手

云原生构建

TAPD 敏捷项目管理

Cloud Studio

SDK中心

API中心

命令行工具

功能1上新10个字符

功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符。

功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符。

功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符

功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符

功能4上新

文章&问答评论现已支持表情

全新交互，全新视觉，新增快捷键、悬浮工具栏、高亮块等功能并同时优化现有功能，全面提升创作效率和体验

社区富文本编辑器全新改版！诚邀体验～ 

精选全网热门MCP server，让你的AI更好用 🚀

💥开发者 MCP广场重磅上线！

涵盖代码开发、场景应用、自动测试全流程，助你从零构建专属AI助手

一站式MCP教程库，解锁AI应用新玩法

聚焦“写作效率、视觉美观与运行性能”三方面进行全面升级，为您提供更高效、稳定的创作环境

社区富文本&Markdown编辑器全新改版上线，欢迎大家体验!

诚挚邀请您参与本次调研，分享您的真实使用感受与建议。您的反馈至关重要，感谢您的支持与参与！

社区新版编辑器体验调研

我已经学习C++三个月了，在此期间，我为我的公司创建了许多应用程序。我认为自己对C++ / MFC和STL相当满意，然而我不仅仅想成为一个还可以的程序员，我还想成为一个优秀的程序员。我有几本关于最佳实践的书，但我想知道是否有人可以建议阅读对他们有帮助的材料，以及应该鼓励的任何学科？谢谢!

问作为程序员进行开发
EN

回答 18

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问作为程序员进行开发EN

回答 18

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问作为程序员进行开发
EN