blocks|key|3838475|text|将单元测试应用于遗留代码是编写+Working+Effectively+with+Legacy+Code的原因。迈克尔·费瑟斯是作者--正如在其他答案中提到的那样，他参与了CppUnit和CppUnitLite的创建。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|3838476|​|3838477|📷|atomic|3838478|3838479|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|https://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/com/0131177052|1|http://sourceforge.net/projects/cppunit|2|http://www.objectmentor.com/resources/downloads.html|3|IMAGE|IMMUTABLE|imageUrl|https://ask.qcloudimg.com/http-save/yehe-900000/519034e6a22b472a1fe645d7dff55d6f.jpeg|imageAlt^0|G|10|0|2E|7|1|2M|B|2|0|0|0|1|3|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|11|8|@]|9|@$A|12|B|13|1|14]|$A|15|B|16|1|17]|$A|18|B|19|1|1A]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|1B|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|H|7|1C|8|@]|9|@$A|1D|B|1E|1|1F]]|C|$]]|$1|I|3|E|5|6|7|1G|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|J|3|-4|5|6|7|1H|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|K|$L|$5|M|N|O|C|$P|Q]]|R|$5|M|N|O|C|$P|S]]|T|$5|M|N|O|C|$P|U]]|V|$5|W|N|X|C|$Y|Z|10|-4]]]]

Applying unit tests to legacy code was the very reason <a href="https://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/com/0131177052" rel="noreferrer" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Working Effectively with Legacy Code</a> was written. Michael Feathers is the author - as mentioned in other answers, he was involved in the creation of both <a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/cppunit" rel="noreferrer">CppUnit</a> and <a href="http://www.objectmentor.com/resources/downloads.html" rel="noreferrer">CppUnitLite</a>.

<img src="https://i.stack.imgur.com/DIt8J.jpg" alt="alt text">

blocks|key|3838308|text|谷歌最近发布了他们自己的C%2B%2B应用单元测试库，名为Google+Test。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|3838309|Project+on+Google+Code|offset|length|3838310|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://code.google.com/p/googletest/^0|0|0|M|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|O|8|@]|9|@$D|P|E|Q|1|R]]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|A|$L|M]]]]

Google recently released their own library for unit testing C++ apps, called Google Test.

<a href="http://code.google.com/p/googletest/" rel="noreferrer">Project on Google Code</a>

blocks|key|750219|text|查看几个可用套件之间的优秀comparison。这篇文章的作者后来开发了UnitTest%2B%2B。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|750220|我特别喜欢它的地方(除了它能很好地处理异常等)，那就是围绕测试用例和测试夹具定义的“管理”是非常有限的。|750221|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://gamesfromwithin.com/exploring-the-c-unit-testing-framework-jungle|1|https://github.com/unittest-cpp/unittest-cpp^0|D|A|0|10|A|1|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@$A|Q|B|R|1|S]|$A|T|B|U|1|V]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|W|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|X|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|M]]|N|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|O]]]]

Check out an excellent <a href="http://gamesfromwithin.com/exploring-the-c-unit-testing-framework-jungle" rel="nofollow noreferrer">comparison</a> between several available suites. The author of that article later developed <a href="https://github.com/unittest-cpp/unittest-cpp" rel="nofollow noreferrer">UnitTest++</a>.

What I particularly like about it (apart from the fact that it handles exceptions etc. well) is that there is a very limited amount of 'administration' around the test cases and test fixtures definition.

blocks|key|2993903|text|Boost有一个Testing+library，它包含对单元测试的支持。这可能值得一查。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|2993904|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_34_0/libs/test/doc/index.html^0|8|F|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

Boost has a <a href="http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_34_0/libs/test/doc/index.html" rel="noreferrer">Testing library</a> which contains support for unit testing. It might be worth checking out.

blocks|key|750168|text|Noel+Llopis是Exploring+the+C%2B%2B+Unit+Testing+Framework+Jungle的作者，这是对各种C%2B%2B单元测试框架的全面(但现在已经过时)的评估，以及一本关于游戏编程的书。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|750169|他使用CppUnitLite很长一段时间，修复了各种东西，但最终与另一位单元测试库作者联合起来，制作了UnitTest%2B%2B。我们在这里使用UnitTest%2B%2B，到目前为止，我非常喜欢它。它(对我来说)恰到好处地平衡了力量，占用了很小的空间。|750170|我使用了自己开发的解决方案、CxxTest+(需要Perl)和boost::test。当我在目前的工作中实现单元测试时，很大程度上归结为UnitTest%2B%2B和boost::test。|750171|我真的很喜欢我用过的大多数boost库，但是IMHO，boost::test有点太笨拙了。我尤其不喜欢它要求您(AFAIK)使用boost::test宏来实现测试工具的主程序。我知道它不是“纯粹的”TDD，但有时我们需要一种方法来运行GUI应用程序中的测试，例如，当在命令行上传递特殊的测试标志时，而boost::test不支持这种类型的场景。|750172|在我有限的经验中，UnitTest%2B%2B是我遇到的设置和使用最简单的测试框架。|750173|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://gamesfromwithin.com/exploring-the-c-unit-testing-framework-jungle|1|http://gamesfromwithin.com/unittest-v10-released^0|C|1B|0|0|1F|A|1|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|V|8|@]|9|@$A|W|B|X|1|Y]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|Z|8|@]|9|@$A|10|B|11|1|12]]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|13|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|14|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|J|3|K|5|6|7|15|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|L|3|-4|5|6|7|16|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|M|$N|$5|O|P|Q|C|$R|S]]|T|$5|O|P|Q|C|$R|U]]]]

Noel Llopis of Games From Within is the author of <a href="http://gamesfromwithin.com/exploring-the-c-unit-testing-framework-jungle" rel="noreferrer">Exploring the C++ Unit Testing Framework Jungle</a>, a comprehensive (but now dated) evaluation of the various C++ Unit Testing frameworks, as well as a book on game programming.

He used CppUnitLite for quite a while, fixing various things, but eventually joined forces with another unit test library author, and produced <a href="http://gamesfromwithin.com/unittest-v10-released" rel="noreferrer">UnitTest++</a>. We use UnitTest++ here, and I like it a lot, so far. It has (to me) the exact right balance of power with a small footprint. 

I've used homegrown solutions, CxxTest (which requires Perl), and boost::test. When I implemented unit testing here at my current job it pretty much came down to UnitTest++ vs boost::test. 

I really like most boost libraries I have used, but IMHO, boost::test is a little too heavy-handed. I especially did not like that it requires you (AFAIK) to implement the main program of the test harness using a boost::test macro. I know that it is not "pure" TDD, but sometimes we need a way to run tests from withing a GUI application, for example when a special test flag is passed in on the command line, and boost::test cannot support this type of scenario. 

UnitTest++ was the simplest test framework to set up and use that I have encountered in my (limited) experience.

blocks|key|3839042|text|我将优秀的Boost.Test库与一个鲜为人知但非常棒的Turtle库结合使用:一个基于boost的模拟对象库。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|3839043|作为一个比文字更好的代码示例，假设您想要测试一个在view接口上工作的calculator对象(这是海龟的介绍性示例)：|style|CODE|3839044|//+declares+a+'mock_view'+class+implementing+'view'
MOCK_BASE_CLASS(+mock_view,+view+)
{
++++//+implements+the+'display'+method+from+'view'+(taking+1+argument)
++++MOCK_METHOD(+display,+1+)+++++++++++++++++++
};

BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(+zero_plus_zero_is_zero+)
{
++++mock_view+v;
++++calculator+c(+v+);

++++//+expects+the+'display'+method+to+be+called+once+with+a+parameter+value+equal+to+0
++++MOCK_EXPECT(+v,+display+).once().with(+0+);+

++++c.add(+0,+0+);
}|code-block|syntax|javascript|3839045|看看在模拟对象上声明期望是多么简单和冗长？显然，如果没有达到预期，测试就会失败。|3839046|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_44_0/libs/test/doc/html/index.html|1|http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/turtle/index.php?title=Turtle^0|5|A|0|S|6|1|0|P|4|Z|A|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|Y|8|@]|9|@$A|Z|B|10|1|11]|$A|12|B|13|1|14]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|15|8|@$A|16|B|17|F|G]|$A|18|B|19|F|G]]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|J|7|1A|8|@]|9|@]|C|$K|L]]|$1|M|3|N|5|6|7|1B|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|O|3|-4|5|6|7|1C|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|P|$Q|$5|R|S|T|C|$U|V]]|W|$5|R|S|T|C|$U|X]]]]

I'm using the excellent <a href="http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_44_0/libs/test/doc/html/index.html" rel="noreferrer">Boost.Test</a> library in conjunction with a much less known but oh-so-awesome <a href="http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/turtle/index.php?title=Turtle" rel="noreferrer">Turtle</a> library : a mock object library based on boost.

As a code example speaks better than words, imagine you would like to test a <code>calculator</code> object which works on a <code>view</code> interface (that is Turtle's introductory example) :

<pre><code>// declares a 'mock_view' class implementing 'view'
MOCK_BASE_CLASS( mock_view, view )
{
 // implements the 'display' method from 'view' (taking 1 argument)
 MOCK_METHOD( display, 1 ) 
};

BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE( zero_plus_zero_is_zero )
{
 mock_view v;
 calculator c( v );

 // expects the 'display' method to be called once with a parameter value equal to 0
 MOCK_EXPECT( v, display ).once().with( 0 ); 

 c.add( 0, 0 );
}
</code></pre>

See how easy and verbose it is do declare expectation on the mock object ? Obviously, test is failed if expectations are not met.

blocks|key|5249585|text|我刚刚推出了我自己的框架，CATCH。它还在开发中，但我相信它已经超越了大多数其他框架。不同的人有不同的标准，但我试图在没有太多权衡的情况下涵盖大多数领域。请看一下我的链接博客条目，供品尝者参考。我最喜欢的五个特性是：|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|5249586|5249587|Header+only|unordered-list-item|5249588|将基于函数和方法的tests|5249589|Decomposes标准|5249590|表达式自动注册到LHS和RHS中(因此，您不需要在基于函数的fixture中使用整个家族的assert+嵌套部分进行C%2B%2B+|5249591|名称测试使用自然语言-函数/方法名称是|5249592|生成的|5249593|5249594|它还具有Objective-C绑定。|5249595|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.levelofindirection.com/journal/2010/12/28/unit-testing-in-c-and-objective-c-just-got-easier.html^0|D|5|0|0|0|0|0|0|1|1|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|12|8|@]|9|@$A|13|B|14|1|15]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|16|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|E|3|F|5|G|7|17|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|G|7|18|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|J|3|K|5|G|7|19|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|L|3|M|5|G|7|1A|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|N|3|O|5|G|7|1B|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|P|3|Q|5|6|7|1C|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|R|3|-4|5|6|7|1D|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|S|3|T|5|6|7|1E|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|U|3|-4|5|6|7|1F|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|V|$W|$5|X|Y|Z|C|$10|11]]]]

I've just pushed my own framework, <a href="http://www.levelofindirection.com/journal/2010/12/28/unit-testing-in-c-and-objective-c-just-got-easier.html">CATCH</a>, out there. It's still under development but I believe it already surpasses most other frameworks.
Different people have different criteria but I've tried to cover most ground without too many trade-offs.
Take a look at my linked blog entry for a taster. My top five features are:

<ul>
<li>Header only</li>
<li>Auto registration of function and method based tests</li>
<li>Decomposes standard C++ expressions into LHS and RHS (so you don't need a whole family of assert macros).</li>
<li>Support for nested sections within a function based fixture</li>
<li>Name tests using natural language - function/ method names are generated</li>
</ul>

It also has Objective-C bindings.

blocks|key|2993874|text|CxxTest是一个轻量级的、易于使用的、跨平台的、类似C%2B%2B的JUnit/CppUnit/xUnit框架。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|2993875|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://cxxtest.tigris.org/^0|0|7|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

<a href="http://cxxtest.tigris.org/" rel="noreferrer">CxxTest</a> is a light, easy to use and cross platform JUnit/CppUnit/xUnit-like framework for C++.

blocks|key|5248500|text|CppUnit就是解决之道。请参阅以下链接：|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|5248501|http://cppunit.sourceforge.net/cppunit-wiki|offset|length|5248502|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CppUnit|5248503|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|1^0|0|0|17|0|0|0|10|1|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|Q|8|@]|9|@$D|R|E|S|1|T]]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|U|8|@]|9|@$D|V|E|W|1|X]]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|Y|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|I|$J|$5|K|L|M|A|$N|C]]|O|$5|K|L|M|A|$N|G]]]]

CppUnit is the way. See link below:

<a href="http://cppunit.sourceforge.net/cppunit-wiki" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://cppunit.sourceforge.net/cppunit-wiki</a>

<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CppUnit" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CppUnit</a>

blocks|key|5248625|text|UnitTest%2B%2B，小而简单。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|5248626|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://unittest-cpp.sourceforge.net/^0|0|A|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

<a href="http://unittest-cpp.sourceforge.net/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">UnitTest++</a>, small &amp; simple.

blocks|key|3839320|text|我目前正在寻找一个单元测试和模拟框架，可以用于我们公司的长期代码库。正如你所知道的，c%2B%2B的list+of+unit+testing+frameworks很长，所以我应用了一些过滤器，将它减少到可以更近距离查看的手写内容。第一个过滤标准是它必须是免费的。第二个标准是项目活动。我还寻找了模拟框架，因为如果你想编写单元测试，你需要一个框架。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|3839321|我提出了以下列表(大约)，按活动排序，活跃度最高的在顶部：|3839322|3839323|GoogleTest+/+GoogleMock:许多贡献者，并由谷歌自己使用。这可能会在这里存在一段时间，并接收更新。对于我的私有代码库，我将切换到这种组合，希望跳到最快的train.|unordered-list-item|style|BOLD|3839324|BoostTest+%2B海龟：不经常更新，但测试框架是boost的一部分，所以应该进行维护。另一方面，海龟主要是由一个人维持的，但它有反感活动，所以它没有死。我几乎所有的测试经验都是使用这个组合的，因为我们在以前的工作中已经使用了boost库，现在我将它用于我的私有code.|3839325|CppUTest:提供测试和模拟。这个项目从2008年到2015年一直很活跃，最近有相当多的活动。这一发现有点令人惊讶，因为许多活跃度明显较低的项目在网上搜索时出现的频率更高(比如CppUnit，它的最后一次更新是在2013年)。我还没有更深入地了解这一点，所以我不能透露任何细节。编辑(16.12.2015):我最近尝试了一下，发现这个框架有点笨拙和“C风格”，特别是在使用模拟类的时候。而且，与其他框架相比，它的断言种类似乎更少。我认为它的主要优点是可以与纯C+projects.|3839326|QTest:一起使用，这是Qt框架附带的测试库。维护应该在一段时间内得到保证，但我将其用作支持库，因为与其他框架相比，测试注册在IMO上更加笨拙。据我所知，它强制每个test-fixture有一个test-exe。但是，测试助手函数在测试Qt-Gui代码时可以很好地使用。它没有mocks.|3839327|Catch:，它最近有活动，但主要是由一个人开发的。这个框架的优点是另一种fixture方法，它允许您在测试本身中编写可重用的fixture代码。它还允许您将测试名称设置为字符串，当您倾向于将整个句子编写为测试名称时，这一点很好。我希望这种风格能被剥离并放入googleTest+;-)|3839328|3839329|模拟框架|3839330|模拟框架的数量比测试框架的数量要少得多，但这里是我发现的最近活动的框架。|3839331|3839332|Hippomock：从2008年开始活跃，现在只有2013年的低intensity.|3839333|FakeIt：活跃，但或多或少是由一个人开发的。|3839334|3839335|结论|3839336|如果您的代码库是长期运行的，请在BoostTest+%2B海龟和GoogleTest+%2B+GoogleMock之间进行选择。我认为这两个会有长期的维护。如果你只有一个短暂的代码库，你可以试试Catch，它有一个很好的语法。然后，您还需要选择一个模拟框架。如果您使用Visual+Studio，您可以下载用于BoostTest和GoogleTest的测试运行程序适配器，这将允许您使用集成到VS中的测试运行程序GUI来运行测试。|3839337|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_unit_testing_frameworks^0|1A|V|0|0|0|0|0|O|0|0|E|0|0|9|3X|F|0|0|6|0|0|6|0|0|0|0|0|0|9|0|0|6|0|0|0|G|D|U|N|2L|5|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|1G|8|@]|9|@$A|1H|B|1I|1|1J]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|1K|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|1L|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|G|3|H|5|I|7|1M|8|@$A|1N|B|1O|J|K]]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|L|3|M|5|I|7|1P|8|@$A|1Q|B|1R|J|K]]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|N|3|O|5|I|7|1S|8|@$A|1T|B|1U|J|K]|$A|1V|B|1W|J|K]]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|P|3|Q|5|I|7|1X|8|@$A|1Y|B|1Z|J|K]]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|R|3|S|5|I|7|20|8|@$A|21|B|22|J|K]]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|T|3|-4|5|6|7|23|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|U|3|V|5|6|7|24|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|W|3|X|5|6|7|25|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|Y|3|-4|5|6|7|26|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|Z|3|10|5|I|7|27|8|@$A|28|B|29|J|K]]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|11|3|12|5|I|7|2A|8|@$A|2B|B|2C|J|K]]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|13|3|-4|5|6|7|2D|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|14|3|15|5|6|7|2E|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|16|3|17|5|6|7|2F|8|@$A|2G|B|2H|J|K]|$A|2I|B|2J|J|K]|$A|2K|B|2L|J|K]]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|18|3|-4|5|6|7|2M|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|19|$1A|$5|1B|1C|1D|C|$1E|1F]]]]

I am currently looking for a unit test and mock framework that can be used at our company for a long lived code-base. As you know the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_unit_testing_frameworks" rel="nofollow noreferrer">list of unit testing frameworks</a> for c++ is long so I applied some filters to reduce it to a hand-full that can be looked in more closely. The first filter criterion was that it must be for free. The second criterion was project activity. I also looked for mocking frameworks because you need one if you want to write unit-tests.

I came up with the following list (approximately) sorted by activity, highest activity at the top:

<ul>
<li>GoogleTest / GoogleMock: Many contributers and used by Google itself. This will probably be here for some time and receive updates. For my private code-base I will switch to this combination in hopes to jump on the fastest train.</li>
<li>BoostTest + Turtle: Not updated that often, but the testing framework is a part of boost so it should be maintained. Turtle on the other hand is maintained by mainly one guy, but it has resent activity so it is not dead.
I made almost all my testing experience with this combination because we already used the boost library at my previous job and I currently use it for my private code.</li>
<li>CppUTest: Provides testing and mocking. This project has been active from 2008 to 2015 and has quite a lot recent activity. This find was a little suprise because a lot of projects with significantly less activity come up more often when searching on the web (like CppUnit which had its last update in 2013). I have not looked deeper into this so I can't say anything about the details.
Edit (16.12.2015): I recently tried this out and found this framework to be a little clumsy and "C-stylish", especially when using the mock classes. Also it seemed to have a smaller variety of assertions then other frameworks. I think its main strength is that it can be used with pure C projects.</li>
<li>QTest: The test library that ships with the Qt framework. Maintanance should be guaranteed for some time, but I use it rather as a supporting library, because the test-registration is IMO more clumsy then in other frameworks. As far as I understand it, it forces you to have one test-exe per test-fixture. But the test helper functions can be of good use when testing Qt-Gui code. It has no mocks.</li>
<li>Catch: It has recent activity but is mainly developed by one guy. The nice thing about this framework is the alternative fixture approach that lets you write reusable fixture code in the test itself. It also lets you set test names as strings which is nice when you tend to write whole sentences as test names. I whish this style would be ripped of and put into googleTest ;-)</li>
</ul>

<h3>Mock Frameworks</h3>

The number of mock frameworks is much smaller then the number of test frameworks but here are the ones that I found to have recent activity.

<ul>
<li>Hippomock: Active from 2008 unitl now but only with low intensity.</li>
<li>FakeIt: Active from 2013 unitl now but more or less developed by one guy.</li>
</ul>

<h2>Conclusion</h2>

If your code-base is in for the long run, choose between between BoostTest + Turtle and GoogleTest + GoogleMock. I think those two will have long term maintenance. If you only have a short lived code-base you could try out Catch which has a nice syntax. Then you would need to additionally choose a mocking framework. If you work with Visual Studio you can download test-runner adaptors for BoostTest and GoogleTest, that will allow you to run the tests with the test runner GUI that is integrated into VS.

blocks|key|750201|text|另请参阅与此密切相关的问题“选择c%2B%2B单元测试工具/框架”的答案，here|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|750202|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|https://stackoverflow.com/questions/13699/choosing-a-c-unit-testing-toolframework#113686^0|X|4|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

See also the answers to the closely related question "choosing a c++ unit testing tool/framework", <a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/13699/choosing-a-c-unit-testing-toolframework#113686">here</a>

blocks|key|2994249|text|还有TUT，模板-单元-测试，一个基于模板的框架。它的语法很笨拙(有些人称之为滥用模板)，但它的主要优点是它全部包含在一个single+header+file中。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|2994250|你可以在这里找到一个example+of+unit-test+written+with+TUT。|2994251|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://tut-framework.sourceforge.net/|1|http://tut-framework.sourceforge.net/_src/TUT-2007-07-06.tar.gz|2|http://pantras.free.fr/articles/hwwtut.html^0|2|3|0|1P|I|1|0|A|11|2|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@$A|S|B|T|1|U]|$A|V|B|W|1|X]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|Y|8|@]|9|@$A|Z|B|10|1|11]]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|12|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|M]]|N|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|O]]|P|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|Q]]]]

There also is <a href="http://tut-framework.sourceforge.net/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">TUT</a>, Template-Unit-Test, a template-based framework. It's syntax is awkward (some called it template-abusing), but its main advantage is that is it all contained in a <a href="http://tut-framework.sourceforge.net/_src/TUT-2007-07-06.tar.gz" rel="nofollow noreferrer">single header file</a>. 

You'll find an <a href="http://pantras.free.fr/articles/hwwtut.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">example of unit-test written with TUT</a> here.

blocks|key|3838135|text|我试过CPPunit，但它对用户不是很友好。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|3838136|我所知道的唯一替代方法是使用C%2B%2B.NET包装C%2B%2B类，并使用.NET单元测试框架(NUnit、MBUnit等)之一编写单元测试。|3838137|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

I've tried CPPunit and it's not very user friendly.

The only alternative I know is using C++.NET to wrap your C++ classes and writing unit tests with one of .NET unit testing frameworks (NUnit, MBUnit etc.)

blocks|key|5249665|text|对于C和C%2B%2B单元测试，CppUTest是一个优秀的轻量级框架。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|5249666|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.cpputest.org/^0|C|8|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

<a href="http://www.cpputest.org/" rel="nofollow">CppUTest</a> is an excellent, light-weight framework for C and C++ unit-testing.

blocks|key|3838088|text|ObjectMentor的迈克尔·费瑟斯在CppUnit和CppUnitLite的开发中都起到了重要作用。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|3838089|他现在推荐CppUnitLite|offset|length|3838090|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.objectmentor.com/resources/downloads.html^0|0|5|B|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|O|8|@]|9|@$D|P|E|Q|1|R]]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|A|$L|M]]]]

Michael Feathers of ObjectMentor was instrumental in the development of both CppUnit and CppUnitLite.

He now recommends <a href="http://www.objectmentor.com/resources/downloads.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">CppUnitLite</a>

blocks|key|750296|text|看看CUnitWin32吧。它是为MS+Visual+C编写的，其中包括一个示例。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|750297|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://code.google.com/p/cunitwin32/^0|2|A|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

Have a look at <a href="http://code.google.com/p/cunitwin32/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">CUnitWin32</a>. It's written for MS Visual C. It includes an example.

blocks|key|5249288|text|看看cfix+(http://www.cfix-testing.org)，它专门用于Windows+C/C%2B%2B开发，同时支持用户模式和内核模式单元测试。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|5249289|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.cfix-testing.org/^0|8|R|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

Have a look at cfix (<a href="http://www.cfix-testing.org" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://www.cfix-testing.org</a>), it's specialized for Windows C/C++ development and supports both user mode and kernel mode unit testing.

blocks|key|2994438|text|如果你使用的是Visual+Studio2008+SP1，我强烈建议你使用MSTest来编写单元测试。然后我使用Google+mock来编写这些mock。与集成开发环境的集成是理想的，允许并且不会带来CPPunit在编辑三个位置以添加一个测试方面的开销。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|2994439|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

If you are on Visual Studio 2008 SP1, I would highly recommend using MSTest for writing the unit tests. I then use Google mock for writing the mocks. The integration with the IDE is ideal and allows and doesn't carry the overhead of CPPunit in terms of editing three places for the addition of one test.

blocks|key|753563|text|我认为VisualAssert在VS集成方面做得很好。它允许您从VS运行和调试测试，并且您不需要创建可执行文件来运行测试。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|753564|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.visualassert.com/unit-testing-framework/^0|3|C|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

I think <a href="http://www.visualassert.com/unit-testing-framework/" rel="nofollow">VisualAssert</a> is doing a great job in VS integration. It lets you run and debug the tests from VS and you don't need to create an executable in order to run the tests.

blocks|key|2994110|text|查看果糖：http://sourceforge.net/projects/fructose/|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|2994111|它是一个非常简单的框架，只包含头文件，因此很容易移植。|2994112|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://sourceforge.net/projects/fructose/^0|5|15|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@$A|O|B|P|1|Q]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|M]]]]

Check out fructose: <a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/fructose/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://sourceforge.net/projects/fructose/</a>

It's a very simple framework, containing only header files and thus easy portable.

blocks|key|2994972|text|我正在对Typemock+Isolator%2B%2B使用MS测试。试试看!|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|2994973|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|https://www.typemock.com/isolatorpp-product-page^0|4|J|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

I'm using MS Test with <a href="https://www.typemock.com/isolatorpp-product-page" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Typemock Isolator++</a>. Give it a try!

I'm working on a large c++ system that is has been in development for a few years now. As part of an effort to improve the quality of the existing code we engaged on a large long-term refactoring project.

Do you know a good tool that can help me write unit tests in C++? Maybe something similar to Junit or Nunit?

Can anyone give some good advice on the methodology of writing unit tests for modules that were written without unit testing in mind?

Unit testing for C++ code - Tools and methodology

翻译质量差，导致语言生硬或混乱。

没有提供实际的解决方法或示例。

解答不清晰，无法理解或解决问题。

页面排版不美观，阅读体验差。

文章

问答

视频

教程

学习中心

腾讯云实验室

直播

竞赛

腾讯云代码分析专区

腾讯iOA零信任安全管理系统专区

腾讯云架构师技术同盟交流圈

腾讯云数据库专区

腾讯云智能顾问专区

腾讯云原生专区

腾讯混元专区

腾讯云TCE专区

腾讯云Lighthouse专区

腾讯云HAI专区

腾讯云Edgeone专区

腾讯云存储专区

腾讯云智能专区

腾讯轻联专区 

腾讯云开发专区

TAPD专区

腾讯轻量云游戏服专区

腾讯云最具价值专家

腾讯云架构师技术同盟

腾讯云创作之星

腾讯云开发者先锋

腾讯云AI代码助手

云原生构建

TAPD 敏捷项目管理

Cloud Studio

SDK中心

API中心

命令行工具

功能1上新10个字符

功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符。

功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符。

功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符

功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符

功能4上新

文章&问答评论现已支持表情

全新交互，全新视觉，新增快捷键、悬浮工具栏、高亮块等功能并同时优化现有功能，全面提升创作效率和体验

社区富文本编辑器全新改版！诚邀体验～ 

精选全网热门MCP server，让你的AI更好用 🚀

💥开发者 MCP广场重磅上线！

涵盖代码开发、场景应用、自动测试全流程，助你从零构建专属AI助手

一站式MCP教程库，解锁AI应用新玩法

聚焦“写作效率、视觉美观与运行性能”三方面进行全面升级，为您提供更高效、稳定的创作环境

社区富文本&Markdown编辑器全新改版上线，欢迎大家体验!

诚挚邀请您参与本次调研，分享您的真实使用感受与建议。您的反馈至关重要，感谢您的支持与参与！

社区新版编辑器体验调研

我正在开发一个大型的c++系统，该系统已经开发了几年。作为提高现有代码质量的努力的一部分，我们参与了一个大型的长期重构项目。你知道有什么好工具可以帮助我用C++编写单元测试吗？也许是类似于Junit或Nunit的东西？对于没有考虑到单元测试的模块编写单元测试的方法，有人能给出一些好的建议吗？

问C++代码的单元测试-工具和方法
EN

回答 22

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问C++代码的单元测试-工具和方法EN

回答 22

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问C++代码的单元测试-工具和方法
EN