blocks|key|3947381|text|领域驱动设计(DDD)是一种对问题及其解决方案进行思考和交流的方法。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|3947382|领域特定语言(DSL)是一种编写代码的方式。|3947383|它们之所以相似，是因为它们都以单词"domain“开头。我想就是这样了。:-)|3947384|entityMap^0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$]]

Domain Driven Design (DDD) is a way of thinking and communicating about the problems and its solutions. 

Domain Specific Language (DSL) is a way of writing code.

They're similar because they both start with the word "domain". That's it, I guess. :-)

blocks|key|3102008|text|域驱动设计强调问题域在为正在设计的系统创建基本词汇表、概念和对象模型时的作用。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|3102009|领域特定语言是一种符号，用于指定或实现系统的特定部分，面向该领域的从业者的需求(即最大限度地减少大多数编程或规范语言的“程序员”方面)。|3102010|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

Domain-Driven Design emphasizes the role of the problem domain as you create the fundamental vocabulary, concepts, and object model for the system being designed.

A Domain-Specific Language is a notation for specifying or implementing specific parts of the system, oriented to the needs of the practitioner in that domain (i.e. minimizing the "programmerese" aspects of most programming or specification languages).

blocks|key|5357301|text|我会争辩说，它们在某种程度上是相关的，而不仅仅是“域”这个词。一旦你有了一个好的(域驱动的)设计，它肯定会帮助你创建一个可靠的DSL。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|5357302|"DDD并不特别需要使用DSL，尽管它可以用来帮助定义DSL。“-+Wikipedia|5357303|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

I would argue that they are somehow related and not only by the word "domain". Once you have a good (domain-driven) design, it will surely help in creating a solid DSL.

"DDD does not specifically require the use of a DSL, though it could be used to help define a DSL." - Wikipedia

blocks|key|5357806|text|我猜两者的主要关注点都是减少编程中的噪声，DDD作用于语义噪声，DSL作用于语法噪声。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|5357807|这些可能有助于理解我的观点：|5357808|http://fragmental.tw/2009/03/12/expessive-design-slides/|offset|length|5357809|http://fragmental.tw/2008/04/20/domain-specific-languages-and-video-games/|5357810|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|1^0|0|0|0|1K|0|0|0|22|1|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|T|8|@]|9|@$F|U|G|V|1|W]]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|X|8|@]|9|@$F|Y|G|Z|1|10]]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|-4|5|6|7|11|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|K|$L|$5|M|N|O|A|$P|E]]|Q|$5|M|N|O|A|$P|I]]]]

I guess both have as its main focus reducing the noise in programming, DDD acts on semantic noise and DSLs in syntactic noise. 

These may help understand my opinion: 

<a href="http://fragmental.tw/2009/03/12/expessive-design-slides/" rel="nofollow">http://fragmental.tw/2009/03/12/expessive-design-slides/</a>

<a href="http://fragmental.tw/2008/04/20/domain-specific-languages-and-video-games/" rel="nofollow">http://fragmental.tw/2008/04/20/domain-specific-languages-and-video-games/</a>

blocks|key|808125|text|DDD的一个元素可以被看作是开发无处不在的语言来与涉众谈论领域的能力。对于那些明确且可能可执行的UL的子集，您可以选择使用内部或外部DSL来实现它们。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|808126|下面是我在DomainDriven网站上讨论这个问题的视频：|808127|http://domaindrivendesign.org/library/bell_gitlevich_2009|offset|length|808128|祝你好运，彼得|808129|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url^0|0|0|0|1L|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|Q|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@$F|T|G|U|1|V]]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|W|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|-4|5|6|7|X|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|K|$L|$5|M|N|O|A|$P|E]]]]

One element of DDD can be seen as the ability to develop Ubiquitous Languages for talking with stakeholder about the domain. For the subset of those UL's that are both unambiguous and potentially executable, you may choose to implement them using an internal or external DSL. 

Here's a video of me discussing this on the DomainDriven site:

<a href="http://domaindrivendesign.org/library/bell_gitlevich_2009" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://domaindrivendesign.org/library/bell_gitlevich_2009</a>

Best Wishes,
Peter

blocks|key|3947581|text|维基百科对DSL有一个非常明确的定义|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|3947582|近年来，术语域特定语言(+|3947583|+)在软件开发中变得流行，以表示专用于特定问题域、特定问题表示技术和/或特定解决方案技术的编程语言或规范语言。|blockquote|3947584|3947585|3947586|这可以实现为遵循某种一致模式的一组类，一些奇特的C%2B%2B模板魔术，或者解释自由文本输入的编译器/解析器来执行您想要的操作。|3947587|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_Specific_Language^0|5|3|0|0|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|U|8|@]|9|@$A|V|B|W|1|X]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|Y|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|H|7|Z|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|I|3|-4|5|6|7|10|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|J|3|-4|5|6|7|11|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|K|3|L|5|6|7|12|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|M|3|-4|5|6|7|13|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|N|$O|$5|P|Q|R|C|$S|T]]]]

Wikipedia has a pretty clear definition for <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_Specific_Language" rel="nofollow noreferrer">DSL</a>:

<blockquote>
 The term domain-specific language
 (DSL) has become popular in recent
 years in software development to
 indicate a programming language or
 specification language dedicated to a
 particular problem domain, a
 particular problem representation
 technique, and/or a particular
 solution technique.
</blockquote>

This can be implemented as a set of classes following some consistent pattern, some fancy C++ template magic, or a compiler/parser that interprets free text input to do what you want.

blocks|key|5357565|text|我认为它们在某种程度上是相关的(正如Christophe所说的)，但却是两个完全不同的方面。我甚至不会拒绝jop的声明。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|5357566|有关DSL的详细信息，请参阅Martin+Fowler's+set+of+pages+on+DSLs+(正在进行的工作)，您可以从example或definition开始。另一个很好的读物是他的QandA。|offset|length|5357567|DDD基于领域模型，通常至少比DSL高一个抽象级别。两者都可以在没有对方的情况下存在，并且正如Christophe已经说过的那样，它们都可以在同一个项目中使用。|5357568|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://martinfowler.com/dslwip/|1|http://martinfowler.com/dslwip/Intro.html#TheExample|2|http://martinfowler.com/dslwip/UsingDsls.html#DefiningDomainSpecificLanguages|3|http://martinfowler.com/bliki/DslQandA.html^0|0|E|10|0|1T|7|1|21|A|2|2P|5|3|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|V|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|W|8|@]|9|@$D|X|E|Y|1|Z]|$D|10|E|11|1|12]|$D|13|E|14|1|15]|$D|16|E|17|1|18]]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|19|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|1A|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|I|$J|$5|K|L|M|A|$N|O]]|P|$5|K|L|M|A|$N|Q]]|R|$5|K|L|M|A|$N|S]]|T|$5|K|L|M|A|$N|U]]]]

I think they are somehow related (as Christophe put it), but two totally different aspects. I wouldn't even dismiss jop's statement.

For very well written information on DSLs refer to <a href="http://martinfowler.com/dslwip/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Martin Fowler's set of pages on DSLs</a> (work in progress), you may start with the <a href="http://martinfowler.com/dslwip/Intro.html#TheExample" rel="nofollow noreferrer" title="example">example</a>, or the <a href="http://martinfowler.com/dslwip/UsingDsls.html#DefiningDomainSpecificLanguages" rel="nofollow noreferrer">definition</a>. Another good read is his <a href="http://martinfowler.com/bliki/DslQandA.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer" title="QandA">QandA</a>.

DDD is based on the domain model and usually at least one abstraction level higher than the DSL. Both can exist without the other, and as Christophe already said, they can both be used in the same project.

blocks|key|803769|text|不同之处在于，一种是使用领域特定语言(DSL)而不是通用语言构建系统的方法，另一种是设计和构建系统的体系结构方法(DDD)。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|803770|相似之处在于，它们都专注于特定的领域。|803771|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

The differences, one is an approach to building systems using a Domain Specific Language language (DSL) instead of a General Purpose Language and the other is an architectural approach (DDD) to designing and building systems. 

The similarity is that they both focus on the specific domain.

blocks|key|3948062|text|维基百科(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain-driven_design)有一个很好的答案：|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|3948063|3948064|+DDD并不特别需要使用DSL，尽管它可以用来帮助定义DSL并支持特定于域的多建模等方法。|blockquote|3948065|3948066|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain-driven_design^0|5|1E|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|Q|8|@]|9|@$A|R|B|S|1|T]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|U|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|E|3|F|5|G|7|V|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|W|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|I|3|-4|5|6|7|X|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|J|$K|$5|L|M|N|C|$O|P]]]]

Wikipedia (<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain-driven_design" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain-driven_design</a>) has a good answer:

<blockquote>
 DDD does not specifically require the use of a DSL, though it could be
 used to help define a DSL and support methods like domain-specific
 multimodeling.
</blockquote>

blocks|key|5357915|text|Markus+Voelter在他的DSL+Engineering+book，第2.5.2段A思考和沟通工具中提供了很好的答案|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|5357916|5357917|实际上，在Eric+Evans的领域驱动设计中，DSL是无处不在的语言的形式化。|blockquote|5357918|5357919|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://voelter.de/dslbook/markusvoelter-dslengineering-1.0.pdf^0|H|K|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|Q|8|@]|9|@$A|R|B|S|1|T]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|U|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|E|3|F|5|G|7|V|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|W|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|I|3|-4|5|6|7|X|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|J|$K|$5|L|M|N|C|$O|P]]]]

Nice answer is provided by Markus Voelter in his <a href="http://voelter.de/dslbook/markusvoelter-dslengineering-1.0.pdf" rel="nofollow noreferrer">DSL Engineering book</a>, paragraph 2.5.2 A Thinking and Communication Tool:

<blockquote>
 In effect, a DSL is a formalization of
 the Ubiquitous Language in the sense of Eric Evans’ Domain
 Driven Design.
</blockquote>

What is the differences and similarities between Domain Specific Languages (DSL) and Domain Driven Design (DDD)?

Domain Specific Languages (DSL) and Domain Driven Design (DDD)

翻译质量差，导致语言生硬或混乱。

没有提供实际的解决方法或示例。

解答不清晰，无法理解或解决问题。

页面排版不美观，阅读体验差。

文章

问答

视频

教程

学习中心

腾讯云实验室

直播

竞赛

腾讯云代码分析专区

腾讯iOA零信任安全管理系统专区

腾讯云架构师技术同盟交流圈

腾讯云数据库专区

腾讯云智能顾问专区

腾讯云原生专区

腾讯混元专区

腾讯云TCE专区

腾讯云Lighthouse专区

腾讯云HAI专区

腾讯云Edgeone专区

腾讯云存储专区

腾讯云智能专区

腾讯轻联专区 

腾讯云开发专区

TAPD专区

腾讯轻量云游戏服专区

腾讯云最具价值专家

腾讯云架构师技术同盟

腾讯云创作之星

腾讯云开发者先锋

腾讯云AI代码助手

云原生构建

TAPD 敏捷项目管理

Cloud Studio

SDK中心

API中心

命令行工具

功能1上新10个字符

功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符。

功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符。

功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符

功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符

功能4上新

文章&问答评论现已支持表情

全新交互，全新视觉，新增快捷键、悬浮工具栏、高亮块等功能并同时优化现有功能，全面提升创作效率和体验

社区富文本编辑器全新改版！诚邀体验～ 

精选全网热门MCP server，让你的AI更好用 🚀

💥开发者 MCP广场重磅上线！

涵盖代码开发、场景应用、自动测试全流程，助你从零构建专属AI助手

一站式MCP教程库，解锁AI应用新玩法

聚焦“写作效率、视觉美观与运行性能”三方面进行全面升级，为您提供更高效、稳定的创作环境

社区富文本&Markdown编辑器全新改版上线，欢迎大家体验!

诚挚邀请您参与本次调研，分享您的真实使用感受与建议。您的反馈至关重要，感谢您的支持与参与！

社区新版编辑器体验调研

领域特定语言(DSL)和领域驱动设计(DDD)有什么不同和相似之处？

问领域特定语言(DSL)和领域驱动设计(DDD)
EN

回答 10

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问领域特定语言(DSL)和领域驱动设计(DDD)EN

回答 10

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问领域特定语言(DSL)和领域驱动设计(DDD)
EN