blocks|key|5117716|text|我同意，现在对开发人员来说，了解一点我们是如何思考的比以往任何时候都更重要。丹·丹尼特写的“Consciousness+Explained”这本书让我大开眼界，让我明白了我们并不是按照自己认为的方式思考的。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|5117717|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|https://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/com/0316180661^0|1A|N|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

I agree that knowing a bit about how we think is more important now for a developer then ever. The book <a href="https://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/com/0316180661" rel="nofollow noreferrer" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Consciousness Explained</a> by Dan Dennett was a real eye opener for me in understanding that we don't think the way we think we think.

blocks|key|1262636|text|我建议Clay+Shirky's+site是一个很好的起点。它是建立在互联网背景下的社会人类学，因此(对程序员来说)它比纯粹的学术人类学更容易理解。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1262637|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.shirky.com/^0|3|I|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

I would suggest <a href="http://www.shirky.com/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Clay Shirky's site</a> is a good place to start. It's social anthropology set in a context of the internet, so it's more accessible (to programmers) than purely academic anthropology.

blocks|key|1262656|text|我听说有一本书很好，但还没有机会深入研究它：Programming+collective+intelligence。它提供了一些算法来量化社交软件中的人类行为。听起来很有趣。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1262657|Mathew+Podwysocki前段时间写了一篇关于implementing+these+ideas+in+Haskell的文章。|1262658|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://oreilly.com/catalog/9780596529321/|1|http://weblogs.asp.net/podwysocki/archive/2009/04/17/haskell-and-collective-intelligence.aspx^0|M|Z|0|0|R|Z|1|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@$A|Q|B|R|1|S]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|T|8|@]|9|@$A|U|B|V|1|W]]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|X|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|M]]|N|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|O]]]]

There is a book I've heard is good, but didn't have a chance to dig through it yet: <a href="http://oreilly.com/catalog/9780596529321/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Programming collective intelligence</a>. It gives you some algorithms to quantify human behavior in social software. Sounds interesting.

Mathew Podwysocki wrote a post some time ago about <a href="http://weblogs.asp.net/podwysocki/archive/2009/04/17/haskell-and-collective-intelligence.aspx" rel="nofollow noreferrer">implementing these ideas in Haskell</a>.

blocks|key|1333778|text|我不确定，接近当代人类学是一个整体，这绝对是发展你所寻求的知识的最佳方式。人类学家研究了许多不同的东西，虽然了解这些东西会帮助你开发出更好的设计和产品，但在这种情况下，作为一个多面手可能并不能有效地利用时间。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1333779|人类学家研究文化，当你把一群人放在一起，让情况发酵一段时间后，就会发生上层建筑的事情。对于粗略的定义，我很抱歉。了解文化，了解文化和社会是如何运作的，是什么导致了它们的崩溃，是什么导致了它们的繁荣，这是令人着迷和有用的。阅读“人类学大炮”将帮助你开始理解这一点，但还有很长的路要走，我认为你需要回答的问题更容易通过一些具体的项目来解决。|1333780|首先，我只想描述一下人类学:虽然人类学不是一个实验领域，但它是令人难以置信的经验性的。人类学家收集了大量的数据，并试图尽可能完整地描述他们所看到的。我认为，这种方法和方法对软件开发人员非常有用。根据你的经验，很容易说“人们想要这个”，或者“用户有这种感觉”，关于你软件的一个特性或方面。很难弄清楚用户的真实感受，并以一种精确的方式与你的软件交互。如果你必须作为一名软件开发人员选修一门人类学课程，我会推荐一门强调方法论的课程。|1333781|就具体资源而言，脑海中浮现出以下方向|1333782|多纳·哈罗威的"The+Cyborg+Manifesto“作为一个研究领域的基础性工作立即浮现在人们的脑海中，该领域探索人与机器之间的互动，作为一种社会现象。短了。读得很好。Amber+Case，一位年轻的“机器人人类学家”，确实遵循哈罗威的传统，我会跟进这两个人。|offset|length|1333783|其次，我将探索对城市和小社区的研究。除非在一些非常极端的情况下(如Twitter、Facebook等)，整个文化都不会使用你的软件。组是。了解它们。我认为被称为“城市社会学”的城市研究和工作可能会开始为你提供你感兴趣的答案。我认为这将是一个很好的起点。|1333784|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.stanford.edu/dept/HPS/Haraway/CyborgManifesto.html|1|http://www.oakhazelnut.com/^0|0|0|0|0|8|K|0|2F|A|1|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|X|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|Y|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|Z|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|10|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|11|8|@]|9|@$J|12|K|13|1|14]|$J|15|K|16|1|17]]|A|$]]|$1|L|3|M|5|6|7|18|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|N|3|-4|5|6|7|19|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|O|$P|$5|Q|R|S|A|$T|U]]|V|$5|Q|R|S|A|$T|W]]]]

I'm not sure that approaching contemporary anthropology is a whole is
the absolute best way to develop the knowledge that you
seek. Anthropologists study a bunch of different things, and while
knowing this stuff will help you be able to develop better designs and
products, this is a case where being a generalist is probably not an
effective use of time. 

Anthropologists study culture, the superstructural stuff that
happens when you put a bunch of people in close proximity and let the
situation stew for a while. Apologies for the rough
definition. Knowing about culture, how cultures and societies
function, what causes them to break, what causes them to flourish is
fascinating and useful. Reading the "anthropological cannon" will help
you begin to understand this, but again long road, and I think the
questions you need answered are more easily addressed with some
specific projects. 

First I'd like to just characterize Anthropology for a moment:
Although Anthropology isn't an experimental field, it's incredibly
empirical. Anthropologists collect a lot of data, and attempt to
describe what they see as totally as possible. This methodology, and
approach is--I think--extremely useful to software developers. It's
very easy to say "people want this," or "users feel this way," about a
feature or aspect of your software based on your experiences. It's
terribly difficult to figure out how users actually feel and interact
with your software in a precise way. If you had to take one
Anthropology class as a software developer, I'd recommend something
with a methodological emphasis.

In terms of specific resources, the following directions spring to mind

Dona Harroway's "<a href="http://www.stanford.edu/dept/HPS/Haraway/CyborgManifesto.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">The Cyborg Manifesto</a>," springs instantly to mind as
the foundational work in a field of study that explores the
interaction between people, and machines as a social phenomena. It's
short. Good read. <a href="http://www.oakhazelnut.com/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Amber Case</a>, a young "cyborg anthropologist" does
work in Harroway's tradition, and I'd follow up on both of these
folks. 

Secondly, I'd explore studies of cities and small communities. Except
in some very extreme cases (i.e. Twitter, Facebook, etc.), whole
cultures aren't using your software. Groups are. Learn about them. I
think urban studies and work that gets called "urban sociology" might
begin to provide you the kinds of answer that you'd be interested
in. I think that would be a good place to start.

blocks|key|5117571|text|了解社交软件的唯一规则是“人们愿意做任何事情来赚钱或做爱”:)|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|5117572|但严肃地说，我不认为人类学是重要的，而是理解人们必须为社交软件做出贡献或暴露自己的动机。最近有相当多的书很好地解释了这些概念。一个好的开始可以是Clay+Shriky的“大家都来了”。|5117573|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

The only rule to know about social software is that "people will do anything to make money or get laid" :)

But on a serious note, I don't think anthropology is what matters, but rather an understanding of the motivation that people have to contribute to social software or to expose themselves on social software. There have been quite a few recent books that explain a lot of these concepts in good terms. A good start could be "Here comes everybody" by Clay Shriky.

blocks|key|5117719|text|The+Design+of+Everyday+Things|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|5117720|The+Humane+Interface|5117721|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|https://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/com/0465067107|1|https://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/com/0201379376^0|0|T|0|0|0|K|1|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@$A|Q|B|R|1|S]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|T|8|@]|9|@$A|U|B|V|1|W]]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|X|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|M]]|N|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|O]]]]

<a href="https://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/com/0465067107" rel="nofollow noreferrer" rel="nofollow noreferrer">The Design of Everyday Things</a>

<a href="https://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/com/0201379376" rel="nofollow noreferrer" rel="nofollow noreferrer">The Humane Interface</a>

blocks|key|1333826|text|这里的许多答案都指向关于意识如何工作或人们如何与设备交互的文本。这是一个很好的开始，因为它显示了你想要去的地方。除此之外，你可以考虑理解人类如何工作的基本社会和经验方面。通过这种方式，您可以在开发软件时了解人类如何体验您的软件，以及它如何成为社交世界的一部分。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1333827|为此，我推荐玛丽·米德格利的“道德灵长类”。这本书是关于哲学、伦理学、自由和进化的，但它牢固地植根于经验知识。它还将为您提供工具，使您能够批判性地检查STEM在讨论人时通常使用的语言和知识--根据我作为计算机科学专业的经验。如果你想阅读关于STEM语言在描述人类时的危险的最后一点的简短文本，你可以阅读Mary+Midgley的《生物技术与怪诞》。|1333828|“纠缠之翼”一文较少涉及对人类进行理论化的伦理和社会影响。|1333829|有许多民族志描述了人们如何与社交媒体等技术互动。这些是您正在从事的技术的具体类型。|1333830|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|M|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|I|$]]

Many of the answers here are pointing towards texts on how consciousness works or how people interact with devices. This is a great start, since it shows where you would want to go. Beyond that, you could consider understanding fundamental social and experiential aspects of how humans work. This way, you can develop software with an understanding of how humans could experience your software, as well as how it could be part of a social world.

To this I recommend The Ethical Primate from Mary Midgley. The text is about philosophy, ethics, freedom, and evolution, but it is firmly grounded in empirical knowledge. It will also give you tools to be able to critically examine the language and knowledge that—in my experience as a computer science major—STEM usually uses when discussing people. If you want to read a shorter text regarding this last point on the dangers of STEM language when describing humans, you could read Mary Midgley's Biotechnology and Monstruosity.

A text that deals less with the ethical and social implications of theorizing about humans is The Tangled Wing.

There are many ethnographies that describe how people interact with technologies such as social media. These are more specific to the kind of technology that you're working on.

Joel Spolsky repeats over and over that today, knowing a bit of anthropology can be very useful for a programer because much of what's being created is social software.

How can someone that already knows the computer science learn the anthropology needed to know how human beings works? Any books? Any recorded lectures?

How to learn the necessary anthropology to create social software?

翻译质量差，导致语言生硬或混乱。

没有提供实际的解决方法或示例。

解答不清晰，无法理解或解决问题。

页面排版不美观，阅读体验差。

文章

问答

视频

教程

学习中心

腾讯云实验室

直播

竞赛

腾讯云代码分析专区

腾讯iOA零信任安全管理系统专区

腾讯云架构师技术同盟交流圈

腾讯云数据库专区

腾讯云智能顾问专区

腾讯云原生专区

腾讯混元专区

腾讯云TCE专区

腾讯云Lighthouse专区

腾讯云HAI专区

腾讯云Edgeone专区

腾讯云存储专区

腾讯云智能专区

腾讯轻联专区 

腾讯云开发专区

TAPD专区

腾讯轻量云游戏服专区

腾讯云最具价值专家

腾讯云架构师技术同盟

腾讯云创作之星

腾讯云开发者先锋

腾讯云AI代码助手

云原生构建

TAPD 敏捷项目管理

Cloud Studio

SDK中心

API中心

命令行工具

功能1上新10个字符

功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符。

功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符。

功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符

功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符

功能4上新

文章&问答评论现已支持表情

全新交互，全新视觉，新增快捷键、悬浮工具栏、高亮块等功能并同时优化现有功能，全面提升创作效率和体验

社区富文本编辑器全新改版！诚邀体验～ 

精选全网热门MCP server，让你的AI更好用 🚀

💥开发者 MCP广场重磅上线！

涵盖代码开发、场景应用、自动测试全流程，助你从零构建专属AI助手

一站式MCP教程库，解锁AI应用新玩法

聚焦“写作效率、视觉美观与运行性能”三方面进行全面升级，为您提供更高效、稳定的创作环境

社区富文本&Markdown编辑器全新改版上线，欢迎大家体验!

诚挚邀请您参与本次调研，分享您的真实使用感受与建议。您的反馈至关重要，感谢您的支持与参与！

社区新版编辑器体验调研

Joel Spolsky今天一遍又一遍地重复着这一点，了解一点人类学知识对程序员来说非常有用，因为许多正在创建的东西都是社交软件。已经了解计算机科学的人如何学习了解人类如何工作所需的人类学？有书吗？有什么讲座的录音吗？

问如何学习必要的人类学知识来创建社交软件？
EN

回答 7

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问如何学习必要的人类学知识来创建社交软件？EN

回答 7

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问如何学习必要的人类学知识来创建社交软件？
EN