blocks|key|945439|text|我不会试图通过投资昂贵的技术来增加我的网站价值:-)我认为你应该把建造这个网站所需的工作时间放在一起，并用一个与你的价值相对应的因素来乘以这个时间。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|945440|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

IMHO I would not try to increase my website value by investing into expensive technologies :-)
I think you should put the working hours together it tooks to build this website and multiply this with a factor, which corresponds to your value.

blocks|key|4484095|text|我认为你现在应该在使用VWD+Express+2010和Sql+Server+Express+(如果你自己托管，否则托管公司会给你Sql+Server+Db)的VWD+Express+2010和Sql+Server+Express中使用ASP.NET+MVC开发(可能是使用EF4.0作为ORM的MVC3+)，然后在开始赚钱和网站点击量增加后转移到Sql+Server2008和visual+studio。如果您认为性能还可以，也可以继续使用相同的版本。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|4484096|当然，这是一个过于简单的答案，Mariusz也是对的。|4484097|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

I think you would be on your way using ASP.NET MVC development (Possibly MVC3 with EF 4.0 as ORM) using VWD Express 2010 and Sql Server Express (If you are hosting on your own, else the hosting company will give you Sql Server Db) now then then move on to Sql Server 2008 and visual studio after you start making money and the website hits increase. It may also be possible to continue using the same if you think the performance is alright.

Of course this is a simplistic answer, Mariusz is right as well.

blocks|key|3016581|text|Silverlight团队的Bob+Muglia在微软的PDC会议后发布了一篇blog+entry。在富web应用方面，微软已将Silverlight作为其首选技术(即与Flash竞争)。然而，随着HTML5的出现，微软可能会改变它的决定。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|3016582|这一切意味着什么？Silverlight+/+HTML5是微软为富web应用程序选择的技术。这并不意味着ASP.NET+(包括MVC)失去了它的价值，但随着用户对更丰富、更具交互性的web应用程序的需求不断增加，我会在工具上投入更多的资金，这些工具将对我的SL和HTML5有所帮助。|3016583|这并不会改变Visual+Studio+/+SQL+Server的增值功能。|3016584|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://team.silverlight.net/announcement/pdc-and-silverlight/^0|13|A|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@$A|Q|B|R|1|S]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|T|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|U|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|V|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|I|$J|$5|K|L|M|C|$N|O]]]]

Bob Muglia of Team Silverlight posted a <a href="http://team.silverlight.net/announcement/pdc-and-silverlight/" rel="nofollow">blog entry</a> after Microsoft's PDC conference. In regards to rich web applications, Microsoft has dubbed Silverlight its technology of choice (i.e. to compete with Flash). However, with the emergence of HTML 5, Microsoft may be switching its decision.

What does this all mean? Silverlight / HTML5 are Microsoft's technologies of choice for rich web applications. This does not mean that ASP.NET (including MVC) loses its value, but as users' demand for richer, more interactive web applications continues to increase, I would invest more in the tools that will help me with SL and HTML 5.

And this does not change the value add of Visual Studio / SQL Server.

blocks|key|700817|text|刀锋是第一件会变钝的东西。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|700818|我会更进一步，Mariusz说，实际上，虽然仅仅是能够谈论你所使用的尖端技术就有营销优势，但就长期价值(无论是对客户还是投资者而言)而言，使用尖端技术是必须证明合理的，因为它是一个卖点。|700819|首先，一些尖端技术需要使用别人的软件。即使它是开源的，你现在也依赖于另一个供应商。如果它是专有的，你就会更加依赖它(定制一个适合你的版本的可能性已经消失了--这不是你想用任何软件做的事情，但至少如果你有源代码的话是有可能的)。|700820|与此同时，如果它是收费许可的，那么这会以一种对您没有好处的方式增加您系统的总拥有成本(即，如果每个安装都有第三方软件，安装成本为X美元，那么您必须在价格中包含X美元，而作为供应商，您永远不会从这些软件中获得任何价值)。|700821|其次，今天的尖端技术可以成为明天的鱼和薯条包装纸*。事实上，人们可以绝对肯定地说，其中一些将成为许多人工具包的常见部分，而其中一些则找到了一个利基，在这个利基中，它仍然很重要，但永远不会成为一种大量人使用的技术。|700822|这是一个可靠的预测。棘手的预测是谁能做到这一点。影响这一点的因素是技术、心理、社会、政治和营销因素的混合体，在这种竞争格局中，很难判断当前的哪一位玩家将占据主导地位，也没有什么可以说新事物会扼杀所有现有的东西。|700823|现在，这并不意味着你应该回避尖端技术。这并不意味着你应该避免使用第三方技术(无论是专有的还是开放的)。这确实意味着你应该确保你从中获得了价值。如果您使用的是在过去十年中尝试和测试过的东西，那么它在五年内仍然同样可靠(可能还会进一步改进)的可能性比使用六个月前的东西要大得多。|700824|将尖端技术转化为竞争优势的方法不是使用它们，而是使用它们来做一些你做不到的事情，或者做不到的事情(可靠、廉价、快速、高效地都算作“很好”)。即使在这里，如果你能想出一个好的方法，将旧的技术转化为其他人正在使用的新技术，你也许能够与更便宜、更可靠的产品竞争。|700825|同样重要的是，要了解你选择不使用的与你所在领域相关的技术--难以预测的另一面是，你决定不使用的技术可能会成为你以后想要甚至需要使用的技术。|700826|最终，所有的技术决策都成为未来发展的资产和负债，以及对客户和投资者的价值。你不能期望技术自我出售，你只能做出合理的技术决策，这样销售技术的人(无论是其他人，还是你在不同的角色)在谈论资产时会有更轻松的工作。|700827|*在卫生习惯监管较少的日子里，在英国和爱尔兰，用旧报纸包装炸鱼和薯条是很常见的。我不确定“今天的新闻就是明天的鱼和薯条”这句成语对世界其他地方的读者有多好的解释。|700828|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|X|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|Y|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|Z|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|10|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|11|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|K|5|6|7|12|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|L|3|M|5|6|7|13|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|N|3|O|5|6|7|14|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|P|3|Q|5|6|7|15|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|R|3|S|5|6|7|16|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|T|3|U|5|6|7|17|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|V|3|-4|5|6|7|18|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|W|$]]

Cutting edges are the first thing to get blunted.

I would go further that Mariusz and say that actually, while there are marketing advantages just in being able to talk about the cutting-edge tech that you use, in terms of the long-term value (whether to a customer or an investor), the use of cutting-edge technology is something that has to be justified, as much as it is a selling point.

Firstly, some cutting-edge tech requires the use of someone else's software. Even if it's open-source you are now dependant upon that other supplier. If it's proprietary, you are even more dependant (the possibility of forking off a custom version that suits just you has gone - not something you'd want to do with any software, but at least there is the possibility if you have the source).

At the same time as that issue, if it's licensed for a fee, then this adds to the TCO of you system in a way that doesn't benefit you (i.e. if each installation has third-party software that costs X dollars to set up, that's X dollars you have to include in your price that you never get any value from as a vendor).

Secondly, today's cutting edge technology can be tomorrow's fish-and-chip wrapper*. Indeed, one can say with absolute certainty that some of it will, while some of it becomes a common part of many people's toolkits, and some of it finds a niche in which it remains important while never becoming a tech that a very large number of people use.

That's a safe prediction. The tricky prediction is which will do which. The factors affecting this are a mixture of technological, psychological, social, political and marketing factors in a competitive landscape where it's hard to judge which of the current players will dominate and there's nothing to say that something new will kill all of what's there.

Now, none of this means that you should shy away from the cutting edge. None of it means that you should shy away from using third-party tech (whether proprietary or open). It does mean that you should be sure you are getting value out of it. If you use what's been tried and tested for the last ten years, the chances of it still being just as reliable (and perhaps further improved) in five year's time is much greater than if you use something that is six-months old.

The way to turn cutting edge technologies into a competitive advantage is not to use them, but to use them to do something that you couldn't do, or couldn't do as well (reliably, cheaply, quickly, efficiently all count as "well") as you could otherwise. Even here, if you can think of a good way to turn older tech to the use that someone else is putting newer tech, you may be able to compete with a cheaper and more dependable product.

It is also important to stay aware of tech relevant to your field that you choose not to use - the flip-side of it being hard to predict what will survive and grow is that tech you decided not to use might become tech that you later do want, or even need, to use.

In the end, all technical decisions become both assets and liabilities to future development and the value to customers and investors. You can't expect the tech to sell itself, you can only make sound technical decisions, so that the people who sell the tech (whether that is someone else, or you in a different role) have an easier job when talking up the assets.

*In days of less heavily regulated hygiene practices, it used to be common in Britain and Ireland to wrap fish and chips in old newspapers. I'm not sure how well the idiom about today's news being tomorrow's fish and chips translates to readers in the rest of the world.

If you would want to build the most expensive possible web application what would you use?
Without buying Microsoft products except VS2010 and SQL Server database.

Does the value increase lie in the technologies that you use and in architectural patterns applied?

If so, what to use among .NET technologies in all application layers to increase the website value?

I am asking this because I have business opportunity and I have no money to invest thus I want to cover my partner's investment with technology contribution.

Thanks a lot.

Cutting edge technologies for .NET web application?

翻译质量差，导致语言生硬或混乱。

没有提供实际的解决方法或示例。

解答不清晰，无法理解或解决问题。

页面排版不美观，阅读体验差。

文章

问答

视频

教程

学习中心

腾讯云实验室

直播

竞赛

腾讯云代码分析专区

腾讯iOA零信任安全管理系统专区

腾讯云架构师技术同盟交流圈

腾讯云数据库专区

腾讯云智能顾问专区

腾讯云原生专区

腾讯混元专区

腾讯云TCE专区

腾讯云Lighthouse专区

腾讯云HAI专区

腾讯云Edgeone专区

腾讯云存储专区

腾讯云智能专区

腾讯轻联专区 

腾讯云开发专区

TAPD专区

腾讯轻量云游戏服专区

腾讯云最具价值专家

腾讯云架构师技术同盟

腾讯云创作之星

腾讯云开发者先锋

腾讯云AI代码助手

云原生构建

TAPD 敏捷项目管理

Cloud Studio

SDK中心

API中心

命令行工具

功能1上新10个字符

功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符。

功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符。

功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符

功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符

功能4上新

文章&问答评论现已支持表情

全新交互，全新视觉，新增快捷键、悬浮工具栏、高亮块等功能并同时优化现有功能，全面提升创作效率和体验

社区富文本编辑器全新改版！诚邀体验～ 

精选全网热门MCP server，让你的AI更好用 🚀

💥开发者 MCP广场重磅上线！

涵盖代码开发、场景应用、自动测试全流程，助你从零构建专属AI助手

一站式MCP教程库，解锁AI应用新玩法

聚焦“写作效率、视觉美观与运行性能”三方面进行全面升级，为您提供更高效、稳定的创作环境

社区富文本&Markdown编辑器全新改版上线，欢迎大家体验!

诚挚邀请您参与本次调研，分享您的真实使用感受与建议。您的反馈至关重要，感谢您的支持与参与！

社区新版编辑器体验调研

如果您想要构建最昂贵的web应用程序，您会使用什么？不购买除VS2010和SQL Server数据库之外的微软产品。价值的增加是否在于您使用的技术和应用的体系结构模式？如果是这样，在所有应用层的.NET技术中使用什么来增加网站价值？我之所以这样问，是因为我有商业机会，但我没有钱投资，所以我想用技术贡献来弥补我合作伙伴的投资。非常感谢。

问.NET web应用程序的尖端技术？
EN

回答 4

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问.NET web应用程序的尖端技术？EN

回答 4

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问.NET web应用程序的尖端技术？
EN