blocks|key|3216228|text|不是的。Reflector会像.NET运行时一样查看您的程序集，以便生成要执行的本机代码。你所能期望的最好的结果就是obfuscate你的代码，让读者更难理解它。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|3216229|可以在Should+you+obfuscate+a+commercial+.Net+application?上找到执行模糊处理的一些优点和缺点|3216230|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2525/best-net-obfuscation-toolsstrategy|1|https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71195/should-you-obfuscate-a-commercial-net-application^0|1M|9|0|0|3|1F|1|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@$A|Q|B|R|1|S]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|T|8|@]|9|@$A|U|B|V|1|W]]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|X|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|M]]|N|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|O]]]]

No. Reflector looks at your assembly just like the .NET runtime would in order to generate native code to execute. The best you could hope for would be to <a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2525/best-net-obfuscation-toolsstrategy">obfuscate</a> your code and make it (somewhat) harder for the reader to understand.

Some pros and cons of performing the obfuscation can be found at <a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71195/should-you-obfuscate-a-commercial-net-application">Should you obfuscate a commercial .Net application?</a>

blocks|key|2228593|text|没有办法阻止.net代码的反编译，也就是说，一个好的混淆程序会使反射的代码更难阅读，其中一些像dotfuscator会阻止反射器显示C#代码；但是，你总是能够看到IL。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|2228594|Dotfuscator中的一个选项是使用不可打印的名称(在反射器上反射)，这使得反编译非常困难。|2228595|微软曾经销售一个软件保护和许可服务，它将加密IL，并使用与加密密钥绑定的自定义VM，这将阻止使用传统工具进行反射。这会带来巨大的性能成本，但是如果您想要保护关键算法或例如您的许可代码，这是很好的。|2228596|http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/slps/default.aspx|offset|length|2228597|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url^0|0|0|0|0|1D|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|Q|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|T|8|@]|9|@$H|U|I|V|1|W]]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|-4|5|6|7|X|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|K|$L|$5|M|N|O|A|$P|G]]]]

There is no way to prevent decompiling of .net code, with that said a good obfuscator will make reflected code harder to read, some of them like dotfuscator will prevent reflector from showing the C# code; however, you will always be able to see the IL.

One of the options in Dotfuscator is to use non-printable names (Reflect on reflector) This makes decompiling extremly difficult IMHO.

Microsoft used to sell a Software Proctection and Licensing Service which would encrypt the IL and use a custom VM that was tied to an encryption key which preventing reflecting using the conventional tools. This had a huge performance cost however it was good if you wanted to protect critical algorithims or for example your licensing code. 

<a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/slps/default.aspx" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/slps/default.aspx</a>

blocks|key|5328658|text|试试dotfuscator。2005/2008有一个社区版。如果做不到这一点，请重新架构您的代码(痛苦)，即由.NET组件调用的ATL/COM对象(私有)(公共)。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|5328659|这是你的选择。|5328660|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

try dotfuscator. 2005/2008 comes with a community edition. Failing that re-architecture your code (painful) i.e. ATL/COM objects(private) called by the .NET components (public).

Choice is yours.

blocks|key|5328723|text|如果你正在寻找一个好的混淆器，试一试RemoteSoft。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|5328724|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.remotesoft.com/^0|I|A|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

If you are looking for a good Obfuscator, give <a href="http://www.remotesoft.com" rel="nofollow noreferrer">RemoteSoft</a> a try.

blocks|key|3216360|text|不久前有一个反反射器技巧，它是有效的，因为.NET反射器不能将一个特定的IL指令翻译成c#代码，但他们已经发布了补丁和乐趣结束了。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|3216361|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

Not so long ago there was Anti reflector trick which was effective because .NET reflector couldn’t translate one particular IL instruction into c# code , but they've released patch and fun is over.

blocks|key|3216372|text|Xheo+Codeveil也是一个很棒的产品。它们还具有许可解决方案(用于创建序列号等，然后通过您自己的激活server0激活它们|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|3216373|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.xheo.com/products/codeveil/^0|0|D|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

<a href="http://www.xheo.com/products/codeveil/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Xheo Codeveil</a> is a great product as well. They also have a Licensing solution (for creating serial numbers etc. and then have them activated thorugh your own activation server0

blocks|key|3216452|text|免责声明:我不为SmartAssembly的制造者RedGate工作。我只是一个非常高兴的客户，找到了一个好的，负担得起的解决方案。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|3216453|选择非常简单，选择SmartAssembly！不要把你的时间和金钱浪费在市场上的其他混淆者身上。我花了更多的钱在评估竞争产品的非计费时间上。它们都有致命的缺陷，几乎不可能调试。SmartAssembly是一个易于使用、文档齐全、功能完善的应用程序，具有出色的支持。在他们的论坛上发布一个问题，并期望实际的开发人员能以相当快的速度得到答案。|3216454|SmartAssembly不仅仅是一个迷惑人。它有一系列功能，包括一个内置的，高度可定制的崩溃报告生成器，您的客户可以自动通过电子邮件发送给您。您可以在自己的服务器或red-gates服务器上查看这些报告。当你在beta测试或向客户发布产品时，我无法告诉你这有多有用。它还生成调试器文件，以便您可以调试您的模糊功能产品可能遇到的任何发布后问题。|3216455|如果你正在交付一个商业应用程序，那么把钱花在一个像样的迷惑程序上是有意义的。在这里，一个糟糕的选择可能会损害您的知识产权，或者更糟糕的是，会导致您进行可怕的调试。与SmartAssembly的成本相比，这一成本是多少？|3216456|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|M|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|I|$]]

DISCLAIMER: I don't work for RedGate the makers of SmartAssembly. I'm just a very happy customer who found a good, affordable solution.

The choice is very simple, choose SmartAssembly! Don't waste your time or money with the other obfuscators in the marketplace. I spent more money in terms of non-billable hours evaluating competing products. They all had fatal flaws and were next to impossible to debug. SmartAssembly is an easy-to-use, well documented, polished application with excellent support. Post a question on their forum and expect an answer reasonably fast by the actual developers.

SmartAssembly is more than an obsfuscator. It has a slew of features, including a built-in, highly customizable crash report generator that your customers can automatically email to you. You can view these reports on either your own server or on red-gates servers. I can't tell you how useful this is when you're beta testing or releasing the product to customers. It also generates debugger files so you can debug any post-release issues you may encounter with your obsfucated product.

If you are delivering a commercial application, it makes sense to spend the money on a decent obsfuscator. A bad choice here can compromise your intellectual property or worse lead you to days of gruesome debugging. What would this cost in comparison to what SmartAssembly costs?

blocks|key|314429|text|Reflector不使用反射来显示源代码。它使用.Net元数据(众所周知的发布格式)来实现这一点。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|314430|没有办法防止这一点，但是你通过混淆你的程序集使它变得毫无意义。在混淆之后，类/方法/字段被重命名，方法中的内联字符串被加密，方法调用被隐藏，方法控制流被置乱，等等。因此，任何使用Reflector的人都会看到很多垃圾，并且无法理解其中的大部分。|314431|免责声明:我在Crypto+Obfuscator的开发者LogicNP软件公司工作|offset|length|314432|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.ssware.com/cryptoobfuscator/obfuscator-net.htm^0|0|0|7|H|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|Q|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@$F|S|G|T|1|U]]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|V|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|I|$J|$5|K|L|M|A|$N|O]]]]

Reflector does not use Reflection to show your source code. It uses the .Net metadata (which is in well known published format) to do that.

There is no way to prevent this, but you make make it pointless by obfuscating your assemblies. After obfuscating, class/method/fields are renamed, inline strings in methods are encrypted, method calls are hidden, method control flow is scrambled and so on. So, anybody who use Reflector will see a lot of garbage and will not be able to make sense of most of it.

DISCLAIMER: I work for LogicNP Software, the developers of <a href="http://www.ssware.com/cryptoobfuscator/obfuscator-net.htm" rel="nofollow">Crypto Obfuscator</a>

blocks|key|316884|text|您还可以选择使用原生C%2B%2B应用程序引导.Net应用程序。然后，您可以对所有.net+dll文件进行模糊处理和加密。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|316885|使用bootstrap+c%2B%2B应用程序将所有文件解密为基于内存的字节数组(其物理自我的精确副本)。|316886|我这样做的方式是将我所有的.net文件保存在一个扩展名为.DAT的加密文件中。C%2B%2B代码将文件抓取到内存映射文件中，然后使用CLR托管API将我的本机C%2B%2B应用程序转换为.net应用程序，然后我使用|316887|Assembly.Load(byte[]...)|316888|因此，在我的应用程序中，我避免创建一个.net可执行文件，而将我的C%2B%2B应用程序设置为可执行文件，这样我所有的窗体、控件等都可以放在一个.Net动态链接库中。|316889|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|M|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|O|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|-4|5|6|7|Q|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|K|$]]

Optionally, you can bootstrap your .Net application with a native C++ application. Then you can obfuscate and encrypt all of your .net dll files.

Use the bootstrap c++ application to decrypt all of your files into memory based byte arrays (exact copies of their physical selves).

The way I did it was to keep all of my .net files in one encrypted file with a .DAT extension. The C++ code grabs the files into memory mapped files then uses the CLR hosting API to turn my Native C++ app into a .net app, which I then use load using

Assembly.Load(byte[]...)

So in my app, I avoided create a .net EXE and made my C++ app the EXE so all of my forms, controls, etc etc live in a .Net Dll.

Is there a way (reliable and preferably not commercial) to prevent from Reflector to reflect my source code???

Thanks,
Adi

Is there a way to prevent Reflector from being able to reflect my source code?

翻译质量差，导致语言生硬或混乱。

没有提供实际的解决方法或示例。

解答不清晰，无法理解或解决问题。

页面排版不美观，阅读体验差。

文章

问答

视频

教程

学习中心

腾讯云实验室

直播

竞赛

腾讯云代码分析专区

腾讯iOA零信任安全管理系统专区

腾讯云架构师技术同盟交流圈

腾讯云数据库专区

腾讯云智能顾问专区

腾讯云原生专区

腾讯混元专区

腾讯云TCE专区

腾讯云Lighthouse专区

腾讯云HAI专区

腾讯云Edgeone专区

腾讯云存储专区

腾讯云智能专区

腾讯轻联专区 

腾讯云开发专区

TAPD专区

腾讯轻量云游戏服专区

腾讯云最具价值专家

腾讯云架构师技术同盟

腾讯云创作之星

腾讯云开发者先锋

腾讯云AI代码助手

云原生构建

TAPD 敏捷项目管理

Cloud Studio

SDK中心

API中心

命令行工具

功能1上新10个字符

功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符。

功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符。

功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符

功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符

功能4上新

文章&问答评论现已支持表情

全新交互，全新视觉，新增快捷键、悬浮工具栏、高亮块等功能并同时优化现有功能，全面提升创作效率和体验

社区富文本编辑器全新改版！诚邀体验～ 

精选全网热门MCP server，让你的AI更好用 🚀

💥开发者 MCP广场重磅上线！

涵盖代码开发、场景应用、自动测试全流程，助你从零构建专属AI助手

一站式MCP教程库，解锁AI应用新玩法

聚焦“写作效率、视觉美观与运行性能”三方面进行全面升级，为您提供更高效、稳定的创作环境

社区富文本&Markdown编辑器全新改版上线，欢迎大家体验!

诚挚邀请您参与本次调研，分享您的真实使用感受与建议。您的反馈至关重要，感谢您的支持与参与！

社区新版编辑器体验调研

有没有一种方法(可靠的，最好是非商业的)来防止Reflector反映我的源代码？谢谢，阿迪

问有没有办法防止Reflector能够反映我的源代码？
EN

回答 9

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问有没有办法防止Reflector能够反映我的源代码？EN

回答 9

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问有没有办法防止Reflector能够反映我的源代码？
EN