blocks|key|260985|text|Brainfuck算数吗？|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|260986|哦，wait...you是指一种useful语言。|260987|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brainfuck|1|http://www.ruby-doc.org/docs/ruby-doc-bundle/Manual/man-1.4/syntax.html^0|0|9|0|0|G|6|1|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@$A|Q|B|R|1|S]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|T|8|@]|9|@$A|U|B|V|1|W]]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|X|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|M]]|N|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|O]]]]

Does <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brainfuck" rel="noreferrer">Brainfuck</a> count? 

Oh wait...you meant a <a href="http://www.ruby-doc.org/docs/ruby-doc-bundle/Manual/man-1.4/syntax.html" rel="noreferrer">useful</a> language.

blocks|key|262275|text|LISP派生、Forth派生和Smalltalk派生(IO?)按照这个顺序，语言的语法可能最少。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|262276|你不能衡量它，因为它不是技术层面的，而是社交层面的。|262277|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

LISP-derived, Forth-derived and Smalltalk-derived (IO?) languages probably have the least syntax, in that order.

And you can't measure it, because it's not technical, it's social.

blocks|key|5220520|text|与一些简单的computational+model非常接近的编程语言可能只有很少的语法。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|5220521|5220522|汇编语言，即基于x86+assembly模型的Turing+machine。基于that的|unordered-list-item|5220523|+Lisp和Lisp派生语言|5220524|5220525|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Programming_language_theory|1|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86_assembly_language#Syntax|2|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turing_machine^0|6|J|0|0|0|8|C|1|N|E|2|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|W|8|@]|9|@$A|X|B|Y|1|Z]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|10|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|E|3|F|5|G|7|11|8|@]|9|@$A|12|B|13|1|14]|$A|15|B|16|1|17]]|C|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|G|7|18|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|J|3|-4|5|6|7|19|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|K|3|-4|5|6|7|1A|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|L|$M|$5|N|O|P|C|$Q|R]]|S|$5|N|O|P|C|$Q|T]]|U|$5|N|O|P|C|$Q|V]]]]

Programming languages that are implemented very close to some simple <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Programming_language_theory" rel="noreferrer">computational model</a> are likely to have very little syntax.

<ul>
<li>Assembly languages, ie the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86_assembly_language#Syntax" rel="noreferrer">x86
assembly</a>, based on <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turing_machine" rel="noreferrer">Turing
machine</a> model.</li>
<li>Lisp and Lisp derived languages that are based on
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lambda_calculus" rel="noreferrer">Lambda calculus</a>.</li>
</ul>

blocks|key|3106639|text|Brainfuck中的Hello+World|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|3106640|%2B%2B%2B%2B%2B%2B%2B%2B%2B%2B[>%2B%2B%2B%2B%2B%2B%2B>%2B%2B%2B%2B%2B%2B%2B%2B%2B%2B>%2B%2B%2B>%2B<<<<-]>%2B%2B.>%2B.%2B%2B%2B%2B%2B%2B%2B..%2B%2B%2B.>%2B%2B.<<%2B%2B%2B%2B%2B%2B%2B%2B%2B%2B%2B%2B%2B%2B%2B.>.%2B%2B%2B.------.--------.>%2B.>.|code-block|syntax|javascript|3106641|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brainfuck^0|0|9|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|Q|8|@]|9|@$A|R|B|S|1|T]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|F|7|U|8|@]|9|@]|C|$G|H]]|$1|I|3|-4|5|6|7|V|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|J|$K|$5|L|M|N|C|$O|P]]]]

A Hello World in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brainfuck" rel="noreferrer">Brainfuck</a>

<pre><code>++++++++++[&gt;+++++++&gt;++++++++++&gt;+++&gt;+&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;-]&gt;++.&gt;+.+++++++..+++.&gt;++.&lt;&lt;+++++++++++++++.&gt;.+++.------.--------.&gt;+.&gt;.
</code></pre>

blocks|key|3106776|text|如果我没猜错的话，Python的“语法”并不比其他任何语言多，但它的“奇怪的符号”比我知道的任何其他语言都少。而且它使用简化的、大部分是简单的英语语法。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|3106777|如果你正在寻找一种严肃的语言，它将易于阅读和编写，但仍然是多产的，去Python。|3106778|或者visual+basic，多年来它变得越来越臃肿，而且它与早期版本存在语法不兼容的问题-所以我不推荐使用VB。|3106779|entityMap^0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$]]

If I guess your purpose correctly, Python has no more or less "syntax" than any other language, but it has less "strange funny symbols" than any other language I know.
And it uses simplified, mostly plain English syntax.

If you're looking for a serious language in which it'd be easy to read and write, but still be prouctive, go for Python.

Or visual basic, which is becoming more and more bloated over the years, and it has syntax incompatibility issues with earlier versions - so I can't recommend VB.

blocks|key|262354|text|据我所知，我试过：|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|262355|262356|Assembly;|unordered-list-item|262357|C/C%2B%2B;|262358|Java;|262359|C#;|262360|PHP;|262361|262362|Python;|262363|Ruby;|262364|Bash;|262365|Perl.|262366|262367|除了bash之外，Perl的语法最短，但读起来却是最慢的之一。|262368|汇编、C/C%2B%2B和Java都很冗长。C#和PHP较少，但仍然。你会被.Net或者一种没有命名约定的语言所困扰。|262369|在简洁、强大和可读性之间取得最佳平衡的是Ruby和Python。|262370|我自己就是Python的爱好者，而且我习惯了Python的语法，所以我会去尝试它。我不喜欢Ruby使用关键字结束代码块的方式。|262371|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|17|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|18|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|C|3|D|5|E|7|19|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|E|7|1A|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|E|7|1B|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|K|5|E|7|1C|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|L|3|M|5|E|7|1D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|N|3|I|5|E|7|1E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|O|3|P|5|E|7|1F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|Q|3|R|5|E|7|1G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|S|3|T|5|E|7|1H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|U|3|V|5|E|7|1I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|W|3|-4|5|6|7|1J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|X|3|Y|5|6|7|1K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|Z|3|10|5|6|7|1L|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|11|3|12|5|6|7|1M|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|13|3|14|5|6|7|1N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|15|3|-4|5|6|7|1O|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|16|$]]

As far as I can tell, I tried :

<ul>
<li>Assembly;</li>
<li>C/C++;</li>
<li>Java;</li>
<li>C#;</li>
<li>PHP;</li>
<li>Java;</li>
<li>Python;</li>
<li>Ruby;</li>
<li>Bash;</li>
<li>Perl.</li>
</ul>

Excepting bash, wich I do not even thing about when it comes to programming more that scripting, Perl has the shortest syntax, but it's one of the slowest to read.

Assembly, C/C++, and Java are really Verbose. C# and PHP less, but still. And you are stuck with .Net or with a language with no naming convention.

The best balance between being concise, powerful and readable are Ruby and Python. 

I am a Python lover myself, and I'm use to the syntax so I'll go for it. I don't like the way Ruby ends blocks using keywords.

blocks|key|2175250|text|我有一个假设，一种语言的相对复杂性是程序员必须知道或记住的项目数量的函数，才能成功地编译模块而不会出错。除了关键字之外，还有其他东西需要枚举，比如特殊符号。也许列出这些符号和分隔符也会很有用。如果一个符号用于两个不同的事情，它将被计数两次。例如，在Smalltalk中，句点(.)用于通过类的命名空间显式寻址类并终止语句。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|2175251|语言关键词68000汇编程序>106+8088汇编程序106+Ada+84+Java1.1+64+Ruby+56+PHP+52+74包括特殊的$variables+C%2B%2B+48+Ruby38+C+28+Python+28+Smalltalk+6|2175252|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

I've a supposition that the relative complexity of a language is a function of the number of items a programmer has to know or remember to successfully get a module to compiile without errors. There are other things to enumerate in addition to keywords, like special symbols. Perhaps listing those symbols and delimiters would be useful as well. If a symbol is used for two different things it would be counted twice. For instance, in Smalltalk a period (.) is used to address a class explicitly through its namespace and to terminate a statement.

Language Keywords
68000 Assembler >106
8088 Assembler 106
Ada 84
Java 1.1 64
Ruby 56
PHP 52 74 including special $variables
C++ 48
Ruby 38
C 28
Python 28
Smalltalk 6

blocks|key|5220551|text|这更多地取决于您对语法的定义。例如，Subtext没有文本语法，但有相当多的可视化语法。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|5220552|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://subtextual.org/^0|I|7|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

It rather depends on your definition of syntax. For example, <a href="http://subtextual.org/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Subtext</a> no textual syntax, but quite a lot of visual syntax.

blocks|key|261033|text|我不确定“最少”的语法，但如果你的意思是简洁/轻量级，那么毫无疑问，K+language必须是一个强大的竞争对手。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|261034|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K_(programming_language)^0|Y|A|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

Not sure about "least" amount of syntax, but if you mean succinct/lightweight, then undoubtedly the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K_(programming_language)" rel="nofollow noreferrer">K language</a> has to be a strong competitor.

blocks|key|3106809|text|大多数现代语言的关键字和运算符相对较少。它们通常有某种方式来指示逻辑块。问题是，更少的关键字和运算符并不意味着更容易阅读和理解代码-只要看看BrainFuck+-4运算符就知道了，没有关键字，而且非常无用。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|3106810|更“自然”的语言更冗长，有很多语法，但对于初学者来说可能更容易。|3106811|Java、C#、Javascript和loads更多的语言共享相同的基本语法。它们都有自己的额外关键字和运算符，但如果你打算学习一种基本语法，它们的起点就是--如果你能用其中一种语法编码，你就可以读懂其他语法。|3106812|entityMap^0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$]]

Most modern languages have relatively few keywords and operators. They usually have some way of indicating a logic block. The problem is that fewer keywords and operators don't usually mean easier to read and understand code - just look at BrainFuck - 4 operators, no keywords and pretty useless.

More 'natural' languages are more verbose and have a lot of syntax, but can be easier for a beginner.

Java, C#, Javascript and loads more languages share the same basic syntax. They all have their own extra keywords and operators, but if you're going to learn one basic syntax their's is where to start - if you can code in one you can read the others.

blocks|key|5220761|text|只需5个字符即可完成Jot的解析：[01]*正则表达式是对所有且仅限合法程序的完整描述。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|offset|length|style|CODE|entityRanges|data|5220762|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://esolangs.org/wiki/Jot^0|H|5|A|3|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|N|8|@$9|O|A|P|B|C]]|D|@$9|Q|A|R|1|S]]|E|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|T|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|E|$L|M]]]]

The parsing of <a href="http://esolangs.org/wiki/Jot" rel="nofollow noreferrer" title="Jot">Jot</a> can be done using only 5 characters: the <code>[01]*</code> regex is a full description of all and only legal programs.

blocks|key|261100|text|计算机编程语言没有语法。完全没有。http://esolangs.org/wiki/Compute，我必须指出，它实际上不能做数学运算。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|261101|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://esolangs.org/wiki/Compute^0|H|W|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

the compute programming language has no syntax. At all. <a href="http://esolangs.org/wiki/Compute" rel="nofollow">http://esolangs.org/wiki/Compute</a>
I must point out however that it cant actually do math.

Which programming language has the least amount of syntax? How can I calculate how many syntax a programming language has?

Thanks.

Which programming language has the least amount of syntax?

翻译质量差，导致语言生硬或混乱。

没有提供实际的解决方法或示例。

解答不清晰，无法理解或解决问题。

页面排版不美观，阅读体验差。

文章

问答

视频

教程

学习中心

腾讯云实验室

直播

竞赛

腾讯云代码分析专区

腾讯iOA零信任安全管理系统专区

腾讯云架构师技术同盟交流圈

腾讯云数据库专区

腾讯云智能顾问专区

腾讯云原生专区

腾讯混元专区

腾讯云TCE专区

腾讯云Lighthouse专区

腾讯云HAI专区

腾讯云Edgeone专区

腾讯云存储专区

腾讯云智能专区

腾讯轻联专区 

腾讯云开发专区

TAPD专区

腾讯轻量云游戏服专区

腾讯云最具价值专家

腾讯云架构师技术同盟

腾讯云创作之星

腾讯云开发者先锋

腾讯云AI代码助手

云原生构建

TAPD 敏捷项目管理

Cloud Studio

SDK中心

API中心

命令行工具

功能1上新10个字符

功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符。

功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符。

功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符

功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符

功能4上新

文章&问答评论现已支持表情

全新交互，全新视觉，新增快捷键、悬浮工具栏、高亮块等功能并同时优化现有功能，全面提升创作效率和体验

社区富文本编辑器全新改版！诚邀体验～ 

精选全网热门MCP server，让你的AI更好用 🚀

💥开发者 MCP广场重磅上线！

涵盖代码开发、场景应用、自动测试全流程，助你从零构建专属AI助手

一站式MCP教程库，解锁AI应用新玩法

聚焦“写作效率、视觉美观与运行性能”三方面进行全面升级，为您提供更高效、稳定的创作环境

社区富文本&Markdown编辑器全新改版上线，欢迎大家体验!

诚挚邀请您参与本次调研，分享您的真实使用感受与建议。您的反馈至关重要，感谢您的支持与参与！

社区新版编辑器体验调研

哪种编程语言的语法最少？如何计算一种编程语言有多少语法？谢谢。

问哪种编程语言的语法最少？
EN

回答 12

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问哪种编程语言的语法最少？EN

回答 12

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问哪种编程语言的语法最少？
EN