blocks|key|178049|text|是的，C#可以非常有效地用于构建应用程序。至于有什么应用程序，你在寻找什么？大应用，小应用？|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|178050|我知道有一个很大的应用是建立在.NET框架(不确定是C#还是VB)之上的，那就是Quickbook。|178051|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

Yes, C# can be used quite effectivly to build applications. In regards what applciations are out there, what are you looking for? Big apps, little apps?

I know of a big app that is built on the .NET framework (unsure if C# or VB) and that is Quickbooks.

blocks|key|2089515|text|在C#中开发桌面应用程序是非常棒的。它不仅仅适用于Web应用程序。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|2089516|WinForms将为您节省大量时间。当涉及到桌面windows开发时，它确实是一等公民。如果互操作是一个问题，你总是可以使用P/Invoke和COM对象包装，这是VS为你做的。|2089517|如果做得好，当客户改变他们的想法时，维护和更新将是一件轻而易举的事情。|2089518|是的，框架需要在机器上，但如果他们使用过windows+update，这应该不是问题。现在有什么语言没有运行时库呢？在VS中，您可以创建包含运行时的简单安装程序。|2089519|当然，如果你打算部署到Linux和mono，你的里程可能会很长。|2089520|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|M|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|O|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|-4|5|6|7|Q|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|K|$]]

Developing a Desktop applications in C# is great. Its not just for Web Apps. 

WinForms are going to save you huge amounts of time. It really is a first class citizen when it comes to desktop windows development. If interop is a problem you can always use P/Invoke and COM object wrapping that VS does for you.

Done right, it will be a breeze to maintain and update when the client changes their mind on what they want. 

Yes, the framework needs to be on the machine, But this shouldn't be a problem if they have ever used windows update. Nowadays what language doesn't come with a run time library. In VS you can create simple installers that include the runtime.

Of course if your gonna deploy to Linux and mono, your mileage may very.

blocks|key|178210|text|PlasticSCM|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|178211|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.plasticscm.com/^0|0|A|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

<a href="http://www.plasticscm.com/" rel="noreferrer">PlasticSCM</a>

blocks|key|2936609|text|如果您可以控制应用程序的系统需求，那么C#就很好。由于某些原因，一些最终用户(尽管我们现在已经快到2009年了)仍然反对40MB运行时，所以如果你想要在商业上部署一个应用程序，这对你来说可能是一个问题。然而，在企业环境中，用户计算机上的软件有一些标准化，这可能不是问题。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|2936610|Delphi和QT都是有问题的。Delphi实际上是一种已死的语言。这些天来使用它的公司，在很大程度上，正在以最快的速度将他们的代码从它移植出去(这些天来，工作版面上似乎充满了从Delphi到C#的迁移工作)。你可能喜欢QT，但它在Windows世界中的运行速度几乎和Delphi一样慢，所以我永远不会认为它是一个真正的选择。|2936611|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

If you can control the system requirements for your application, C# is fine. Some end users still (even though we're nearly in 2009 now) object to a 40MB runtime for some reason, so if you're looking to deploy an application commercially, that may be an issue for you. In a corporate setting, though, where there is some standardization of software on users' computers, this is probably not a problem.

Delphi and QT specifically are both problems. Delphi is effectively a dead language. Companies that are using it these days are, for the most part, porting their code away from it as fast as they can (job boards seem to be full of Delphi-to-C# migration jobs these days). You may like QT, but that moves almost as slowly as Delphi in the Windows world, so I would never consider it to be a real option.

blocks|key|2937112|text|更多信息：|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|2937113|2937114|商业计划书专业|unordered-list-item|2937115|救援时间客户端|2937116|索尼维加斯移动办公系统|2937117|Sql+Management+Studio|2937118|VS+2010+(远高于VS+200x)|2937119|美国国家航空航天局全球Wind|2937120|BabySmash|2937121|Windows现场Writer|2937122|Microsoft办公室Accounting|2937123|Fiddler+2|2937124|联想utilities|2937125|Planbook|2937126|的|2937127|2937128|
+Device+|2937129|2937130|2937131|这些只是安装在我电脑上的。|2937132|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|1C|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|1D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|C|3|D|5|E|7|1E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|E|7|1F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|E|7|1G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|K|5|E|7|1H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|L|3|M|5|E|7|1I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|N|3|O|5|E|7|1J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|P|3|Q|5|E|7|1K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|R|3|S|5|E|7|1L|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|T|3|U|5|E|7|1M|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|V|3|W|5|E|7|1N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|X|3|Y|5|E|7|1O|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|Z|3|10|5|E|7|1P|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|11|3|12|5|6|7|1Q|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|13|3|-4|5|E|7|1R|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|14|3|15|5|6|7|1S|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|16|3|-4|5|E|7|1T|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|17|3|-4|5|6|7|1U|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|18|3|19|5|6|7|1V|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|1A|3|-4|5|6|7|1W|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|1B|$]]

More:

<ul>
<li>Business Plan Pro </li>
<li>Rescue Time client </li>
<li>Sony Vegas</li>
<li>Sql Management Studio</li>
<li>VS 2010 (much more so than VS 200x)</li>
<li>NASA's World Wind</li>
<li>BabySmash</li>
<li>Windows Live Writer</li>
<li>Microsoft Office Accounting</li>
<li>Fiddler 2</li>
<li>Windows Mobile Device Center</li>
<li>AdiIRC</li>
<li>Jetbrains dotTrace</li>
<li>Lots of Lenovo utilities</li>
<li>Planbook</li>
</ul>

These are just the ones installed on my PC...

blocks|key|2084577|text|我认为Microsoft+Expression+Blend/Studio是用C#编写的|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|2084578|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

I think that Microsoft Expression Blend/Studio is written in C#

blocks|key|2084632|text|为Robotics+Studio做的任何事情，任何XNA游戏(现在已经有相当多的商业游戏出来了)|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|2084633|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

Anything done for Robotics Studio, any XNA game (quite a few commerical ones are coming out now)

blocks|key|5050451|text|我不明白你为什么不使用C#作为独立软件开发商。问题是要确保你的目标市场有.NET框架。如果你使用的是3.5，你可以在你的发行版中构建一个迷你版本，当然这会增加下载文件的大小。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|5050452|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

I don't see why you would not use C# as an ISV. The problem is ensuring that your target market has the .NET framework. If you are using 3.5, you can build a mini version into your distribution though this increases the file sizes for downloads of course.

blocks|key|2084664|text|需要考虑的一些补充信息：|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|2084665|反对做桌面应用程序的一个典型问题是，分布式模型管理起来要困难得多。对于web应用，如果你有一个庞大的用户群，你可以做一个更新，并立即让你的整个用户群运行在最新版本上。|2084666|对于传统的桌面应用程序，你必须发送一个.msi或自己构建一些东西。然而，使用ClickOnce和更新程序应用程序块(http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms978574.aspx)，将智能更新构建到您的应用程序中是如此容易，以至于它可能在ISV计划中发挥非常好的作用。|offset|length|2084667|尽管VS2008/WPF正在缩小差距，但在WinForms空间中开发客户端应用程序通常要比在web上快得多，所以我认为这是一个非常可行的方法。|2084668|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms978574.aspx^0|0|0|1M|1H|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|T|8|@]|9|@$F|U|G|V|1|W]]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|X|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|-4|5|6|7|Y|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|K|$L|$5|M|N|O|A|$P|Q]]]]

Some supplemental information to think about:

One of the typical points against doing desktop applications the distribution model is a lot more difficult to manage. With web apps, if you have a large user base, you can do an update and instantly have your entire user base running on the latest version. 

With traditional desktop apps, you'd have to send out an .msi or build something yourself.
However, with ClickOnce and the Updater Application Block (<a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms978574.aspx" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms978574.aspx</a>), it's so easy to build intelligent updating into your application that it might play very nicely into an ISV plan. 

Even though VS 2008/WPF is shrinking the gap, it's typically much faster to develop client applications in the WinForms space that on the web, so I think it's a very viable approach.

blocks|key|175947|text|我相信TimeSnapper是用C#编写的|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|175948|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

I believe TimeSnapper is written in C#

blocks|key|2937059|text|在使用Delphi之前，我曾在一家ISV工作过，它非常适合他们的需求。它仍然产生了很好的原生应用程序，尽管它已经死亡，但它肯定还没有死。直到最近，我一直建议在桌面应用程序中使用Delphi而不是c#，因为我有性能和内存占用方面的共识，但由于.net现在可以被认为是无处不在的，而且这个平台正在走向成熟，我的想法可能是选择c#+(基于Delphi)。如果你需要考虑员工，你会发现c#周围的Delphi开发人员很少。因此，您可能很难吸引优秀的开发人员，因为您正在使用它。这就是说，Delphi看起来再次与Delphi棱镜VS插件令人兴奋。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|2937060|顺便说一句，你知道c#编译器是用c%2B%2B编写的吗？Delphi是从1.0版开始用Delphi编写的|2937061|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

I have worked for an ISV before that used Delphi and it was excellent for their needs. It still produces great native applications and although dieing it is certainly not dead (yet). Until recently I would have recommened Delphi over c# for desktop applications as I had performance and footprint consderations but as .net can now be considered ubiquitous and that the platform is now maturing my opinoin would probably go with c# (over Delphi).
If you need to consider employees, you will find that there are fewer Delphi developers around that c# ones. So you may struggle to entice good devleopers in as you are using that.
That said Delphi is looking exciting again with the Delphi prism VS plugin.

Just as an aside did you know that the c# compiler is written in c++? Delphi was written in Delphi from v1.0

blocks|key|5050540|text|Windows媒体中心由.NET提供支持。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|5050541|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

Windows Media Centre is powered by .NET.

blocks|key|175894|text|我相信微软使用C#来构建他们的许多应用程序，包括Windows和Web。此时，由于语言/框架的灵活性，C#是一种很好的语言。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|175895|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

I believe that MS use C# to build many of their apps both Windows and Web. At this time, C# is a great language to go with because of the flexibility of the language/framework.

blocks|key|178065|text|你的目标用户是谁？他们的需求将决定你对语言的选择。C#和VB.NET是很好的通用语言，但是如果你的目标是Mac或*nix，你可能需要像C%2B%2B这样的语言。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|178066|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

Who are your target users? Their needs will dictate your choice of language. C# and VB.NET are good general purpose langs, but if you are targeting Mac or *nix, you may want something like C++.

blocks|key|2084593|text|zune软件(v2及以上版本)是用c#编写的。哦，而且Sage+Timberline+Office主要是用.net写的。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|2084594|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

The zune software (v2 and up) is written in c#. Oh, and Sage Timberline Office is written in .net (mostly).

blocks|key|2936843|text|尽管它是一个开发人员工具，但优秀的开源集成开发环境SharpDevelop是用C#构建的。我还开发了另一个(尽管是半商业化的)，我不能随意透露。(非常垂直的市场。)|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|2936844|我是C#/WinForms组合的超级粉丝，如果你的开发人员已经熟悉C#并且你想进入桌面领域，我不明白你为什么不走这条路。|2936845|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.icsharpcode.net/OpenSource/SD/Download/^0|P|C|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@$A|O|B|P|1|Q]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|M]]]]

Although it's a developer tool, the excellent open source IDE <a href="http://www.icsharpcode.net/OpenSource/SD/Download/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">SharpDevelop</a> was built in C#. I've also worked on another which (despite being semi-commercially-available) I'm not at liberty to divulge. (Very vertical market.) 

I'm a huge fan of the C#/WinForms combination, and can't see why you wouldn't go that route if your developers are already familiar with C# and you want to get into the desktop space.

blocks|key|2936896|text|商业上成功的应用程序的一个非常突出的例子是Microsoft+Visual+Studio2005本身。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|2936897|如果您正在考虑为Windows生态系统构建客户端或服务器应用程序，使用C#的.Net绝对是一个有效的选择。你会得到一个非常丰富的框架，一个很棒的第三方应用生态系统和一个巨大的社区。|2936898|如果您的应用程序需要最小的内存占用，或者非常以硬件为中心，那么C%2B%2B可能是一个选择。|2936899|如果你想以UNIX/LINUX或苹果平台为目标，你应该寻找更适合各自平台的原生框架，尽管你可以与Mono项目获得一定程度的互操作性(但我不知道他们目前对.Net的实现有多完整)。|2936900|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|M|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|I|$]]

A very prominent example for a commercialy successful application would be Microsoft Visual Studio 2005 itself. 
If you are looking into building a client or server application for the Windows ecosystem .Net with C# is an absolut valid choice. You'll get a very rich framework, a great third-party-app ecosystem and a huge community. 
If you need a minimal memory footprint for your application or are very hardware centric then C++ maybe an option. 
If you want to target the UNIX/LINUX or Apple platforms you should be looking in frameworks more native for the respective platform, though you can get a certain degree of interoperability with the Mono project (But I am not up to date on how complete their implementation of .Net currently is).

blocks|key|5050527|text|我相信matrox显卡配置实用程序正在使用.net-framework。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|5050528|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

I believe the matrox graphics card configuration utilities are using the .net-framework.

blocks|key|2936973|text|我还只是个学生，但不管怎么说(从我之前的回答来看)，C#中似乎有相当多的应用。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|2936974|我建议阅读Head+First+C#+(Amazon+link)这本书。这本书将会让你对如何使用这门语言有一个非常扎实的想法。|offset|length|2936975|=-MDP-=|2936976|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|https://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/com/0596514824^0|0|K|B|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|Q|8|@]|9|@$D|R|E|S|1|T]]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|U|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|V|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|I|$J|$5|K|L|M|A|$N|O]]]]

I'm still just a student, but for what it's worth (and from other answers preceding mine), there seem to be quite a few apps in C#.

I'd advise working through the book Head First C# (<a href="https://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/com/0596514824" rel="nofollow noreferrer" rel="nofollow noreferrer" title="HeadFirst C# on Amazon.com">Amazon link</a>). This book will give you a pretty solid idea of what you can do with the language.

=-MDP-=

blocks|key|2936982|text|Creative+Docs+.NET是一个非常好的C#应用程序示例。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|2936983|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.creativedocs.net/^0|0|I|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

<a href="http://www.creativedocs.net" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Creative Docs .NET</a> is a very nice example of C# application.

blocks|key|5050591|text|微软的World+Wide+Telescope软件是用c#编写的|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|5050592|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

Microsoft's World Wide Telescope software is written in c#

blocks|key|2089709|text|如果你正在寻找一种快速入门的方法，我最近发布了DesktopBootstrap，这是我试图找出你入门所需的元素的尝试。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|2089710|希望这能有所帮助！|2089711|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|https://github.com/adamsmith/DesktopBootstrap^0|N|G|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@$A|O|B|P|1|Q]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|M]]]]

If you're looking for a way to get started quickly, I recently published <a href="https://github.com/adamsmith/DesktopBootstrap" rel="nofollow" title="DesktopBootstrap">DesktopBootstrap</a>, which is my attempt to factor out the elements you'll need to get started.

Hope that helps!

In looking at the use of C# in a ISV setting, I'm wondering what prominent C# based desktop apps are out there? I can think of only Paint .NET. 

Is C# a good idea for an ISV, or should one stick to more native environments like Delphi or even QT?

Of course any experienced based advise or feedback would be appreciated.

C# Desktop Applications?

翻译质量差，导致语言生硬或混乱。

没有提供实际的解决方法或示例。

解答不清晰，无法理解或解决问题。

页面排版不美观，阅读体验差。

文章

问答

视频

教程

学习中心

腾讯云实验室

直播

竞赛

腾讯云代码分析专区

腾讯iOA零信任安全管理系统专区

腾讯云架构师技术同盟交流圈

腾讯云数据库专区

腾讯云智能顾问专区

腾讯云原生专区

腾讯混元专区

腾讯云TCE专区

腾讯云Lighthouse专区

腾讯云HAI专区

腾讯云Edgeone专区

腾讯云存储专区

腾讯云智能专区

腾讯轻联专区 

腾讯云开发专区

TAPD专区

腾讯轻量云游戏服专区

腾讯云最具价值专家

腾讯云架构师技术同盟

腾讯云创作之星

腾讯云开发者先锋

腾讯云AI代码助手

云原生构建

TAPD 敏捷项目管理

Cloud Studio

SDK中心

API中心

命令行工具

功能1上新10个字符

功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符。

功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符。

功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符

功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符

功能4上新

文章&问答评论现已支持表情

全新交互，全新视觉，新增快捷键、悬浮工具栏、高亮块等功能并同时优化现有功能，全面提升创作效率和体验

社区富文本编辑器全新改版！诚邀体验～ 

精选全网热门MCP server，让你的AI更好用 🚀

💥开发者 MCP广场重磅上线！

涵盖代码开发、场景应用、自动测试全流程，助你从零构建专属AI助手

一站式MCP教程库，解锁AI应用新玩法

聚焦“写作效率、视觉美观与运行性能”三方面进行全面升级，为您提供更高效、稳定的创作环境

社区富文本&Markdown编辑器全新改版上线，欢迎大家体验!

诚挚邀请您参与本次调研，分享您的真实使用感受与建议。您的反馈至关重要，感谢您的支持与参与！

社区新版编辑器体验调研

在查看独立软件开发商环境中C#的使用时，我想知道基于C#的桌面应用有哪些突出的地方？我只能想到画.NET。对于独立软件开发商来说，C#是一个好主意吗?或者应该坚持使用更多的本地环境，比如Delphi甚至QT？当然，任何基于经验的建议或反馈都将不胜感激。

问C#桌面应用程序？
EN

回答 22

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问C#桌面应用程序？EN

回答 22

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问C#桌面应用程序？
EN