blocks|key|133821|text|它们都是正确的，尽管我认为adaptor更倾向于用于人(比如改编一段音乐的人)，而adaptor用于设备或机器；因此，在计算中，adaptor通常会被使用。维基百科mentions+this+distinction，虽然没有任何真实的参考来支持它。我会使用你觉得更舒服的，或者在你正在工作的代码库中已经使用的那个，如果这个词已经被使用过的话。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|133822|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adapter^0|2A|P|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

They are both correct, though I think there's a slight preference for adapter to be used for people (such as someone who adapts a piece of music), while adaptor is used for a device or machine; thus, in computing, adaptor would generally be used. Wikipedia <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adapter" rel="noreferrer">mentions this distinction</a>, though without any real references to back it up. I would use whichever you feel more comfortable with, or the one in already in use in the code base you're working in if the word has been used already.

blocks|key|4958831|text|它在“四人帮”一书(第139页)中被拼写为适配器，这通常被认为是权威的。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|offset|length|style|BOLD|entityRanges|data|4958832|在英式英语中，该术语通常拼写为Adaptor。|4958833|“四人帮”这本书的完整参考资料是：|4958834|4958835|设计模式:+Erich+Gamma+(作者)，Richard+Helm+(作者)，Ralph+Johnson+(作者)，John+Vlisside(作者)|blockquote|4958836|
的可重用面向对象软件的元素|4958837|entityMap^0|L|3|0|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|R|8|@$9|S|A|T|B|C]]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|U|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|V|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|J|3|-4|5|6|7|W|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|K|3|L|5|M|7|X|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|N|3|O|5|6|7|Y|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|P|3|-4|5|6|7|Z|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]]|Q|$]]

It is spelled Adapter in the 'Gang of Four' book (page 139) which is often considered definitive.

The term would usually be spelled Adaptor in British English.

A full reference for the 'Gang of Four' book is:

<blockquote>
 Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software by
 Erich Gamma (Author), Richard Helm (Author), Ralph Johnson (Author),
 John Vlissides (Author)
</blockquote>

blocks|key|2845980|text|作为一名澳大利亚人，我将其拼写为Adaptor+(+Adapter是适配的人，adaptor是执行适配的设备)。我的队友(+Kiwi)将其拼写为Adapter+(这使得我们的代码有时很“有趣”)。我认识的美国人拼写Adapter，我不知道Poms用的是什么！这显然是一件辩证的事情。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|2845981|如果您的编程语言支持unicode，请使用schwa+j/k对其进行命名。|2845982|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

As an Aussie, I spell it Adaptor (an Adapter is a person who adapts, an adaptor is a device that performs adaptation). My teammate (who is Kiwi) spells it Adapter (which makes our code 'interesting' at times). The Yanks I know spell it Adapter, and I have no idea what the Poms use! It's obviously a dialectic thing.

If your programming language supports unicode, name it with a schwa j/k

blocks|key|131585|text|您选择的语言在这里可能很有意义--+C%2B%2B标准和Boost使用"adaptor"，Java使用“adaptor”。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|131586|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

Your choice of language might be meaningful here -- the C++ standard and Boost use "adaptor", Java uses "adapter".

blocks|key|131517|text|我使用adaptor，因为这是正确的拼写:)但我猜如果你不是来自美国，正确的拼写可能是adaptor。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|131518|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adapter|offset|length|131519|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url^0|0|0|10|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|M|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@$D|O|E|P|1|Q]]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|A|$L|C]]]]

I use adapter, because that's the correct spelling :) but i guess if you're not from the US the correct spelling might be adaptor.

<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adapter" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adapter</a>

blocks|key|4958794|text|我想你更常看到的是“适配器”。任何一个都是正确的，所以这真的取决于你。特别是设计模式似乎拼写为adapter。但是，如果你看一下维基百科关于它的文章(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adapter_pattern)，它在图表中拼写为adaptor！坦率地说，我一开始就看不到拼写adaptor这个词的任何理由，但英语在这方面是一门有趣的语言。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|4958795|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adapter_pattern^0|23|18|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

I think you'll see "adapter" more commonly. Either is correct, so it's really up to you. The design pattern in particular seems to be spelled adapter. But, if you look at the wikipedia article on it (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adapter_pattern" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adapter_pattern</a>), it's spelled adaptor in the diagrams! Frankly, I don't see any justification for spelling the word adaptor in the first place, but English is a funny language that way.

blocks|key|2846003|text|具体到Android，拼写应该是适配器，为了和框架保持一致：|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|offset|length|style|BOLD|entityRanges|data|2846004|android.widget.ListAdapter
android.bluetooth.BluetoothAdapter
android.support.v4.view.PagerAdapter
android.widget.SpinnerAdapter
android.nfc.NfcAdapter|code-block|syntax|javascript|2846005|entityMap^0|G|3|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|M|8|@$9|N|A|O|B|C]]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|H|7|P|8|@]|D|@]|E|$I|J]]|$1|K|3|-4|5|6|7|Q|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]]|L|$]]

Specific to Android, the spelling should be adapter, in order to keep it consistent with the framework:

<pre><code>android.widget.ListAdapter
android.bluetooth.BluetoothAdapter
android.support.v4.view.PagerAdapter
android.widget.SpinnerAdapter
android.nfc.NfcAdapter
</code></pre>

blocks|key|2038443|text|根据谷歌趋势，适配器更为常见：https://www.google.com/trends/explore?cat=5&date=all&q=adapter,adaptor+https://www.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&q=adapter%2520pattern,adaptor%2520pattern|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|offset|length|style|BOLD|entityRanges|data|2038444|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|https://www.google.com/trends/explore?cat=5&date=all&q=adapter,adaptor|1|https://www.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&q=adapter%2520pattern,adaptor%2520pattern^0|7|3|F|1Y|0|2E|2C|1|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|P|8|@$9|Q|A|R|B|C]]|D|@$9|S|A|T|1|U]|$9|V|A|W|1|X]]|E|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|Y|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|E|$L|M]]|N|$5|I|J|K|E|$L|O]]]]

According to Google Trends, Adapter is much more common:
<a href="https://www.google.com/trends/explore?cat=5&amp;date=all&amp;q=adapter,adaptor" rel="nofollow">https://www.google.com/trends/explore?cat=5&amp;date=all&amp;q=adapter,adaptor</a>
<a href="https://www.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&amp;q=adapter%20pattern,adaptor%20pattern" rel="nofollow">https://www.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&amp;q=adapter%20pattern,adaptor%20pattern</a>

blocks|key|133917|text|大多数引用都说“适配器”和“适配器”是可以互换的。如果它们是完全可互换的，那么为什么有两个单词呢？|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|133918|Websters定义了后缀，它们看起来几乎是相同的，除了“er”更普遍地应用：|133919|133920|“er”：做由词根动词表示的动作的人或事。|unordered-list-item|133921|“or”：做(指定的)事情的人和事|133922|133923|我选择“adapter”作为首选拼写，但我承认这是个人偏好。|133924|另一个单词“adopter”将被认为拼写错误为“adoptor”(参见spellchecker.net/misspellings/adoptor)。|133925|此外，“conductor”会被认为拼写错误为“conducter”，无论是指领导一个音乐团的人还是传输电流的东西。|133926|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|T|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|U|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|E|3|F|5|G|7|V|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|G|7|W|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|-4|5|6|7|X|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|K|3|L|5|6|7|Y|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|M|3|N|5|6|7|Z|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|O|3|P|5|6|7|10|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|Q|3|-4|5|6|7|11|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|R|$]]

Most references say “adapter” and “adaptor” are interchangeable. If they are completely interchangeable, then why have two words?
Websters defines the suffixes, and they seem virtually identical except that “er” applies more universally:
<ul>
<li>“er”: A person or thing that does an action indicated by the root verb.</li>
<li>“or”: One that does a (specified) thing</li>
</ul>
I choose “adapter” as the preferred spelling, but I acknowledge that it is personal preference.
A different word, “adopter”, would be considered misspelled as “adoptor” (see spellchecker.net/misspellings/adoptor).
Further, a “conductor” would be considered misspelled as “conducter”, regardless of whether referring to person leading a musical group or a thing transferring electrical current.

blocks|key|4958946|text|正如这里的一些人已经指出的，正确的拼写是adaptor。仅仅因为美国人把英语搞得一团糟(注:英语也不是一文不值)，并不断地试图把英语注入他们所有的计算机应用程序和媒体，等等，这并不意味着他们是正确的。:)|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|4958947|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

As some people here have already pointed out, the correct spelling is adaptor. Just because Americans have bastardised (Note: it's not bastardized either) the English language and constantly attempt to bleed it into all of their computer applications and media, among other things, does not make them right. :)

In programming, which spelling&mdash;adapter or adaptor&mdash;is standard or de facto standard? Is there a difference between them?

In boost I see "adaptor", whereas in literature I see "adapter".

Which one is preferred in code?

"Adapter" or "adaptor"?

翻译质量差，导致语言生硬或混乱。

没有提供实际的解决方法或示例。

解答不清晰，无法理解或解决问题。

页面排版不美观，阅读体验差。

文章

问答

视频

教程

学习中心

腾讯云实验室

直播

竞赛

腾讯云代码分析专区

腾讯iOA零信任安全管理系统专区

腾讯云架构师技术同盟交流圈

腾讯云数据库专区

腾讯云智能顾问专区

腾讯云原生专区

腾讯混元专区

腾讯云TCE专区

腾讯云Lighthouse专区

腾讯云HAI专区

腾讯云Edgeone专区

腾讯云存储专区

腾讯云智能专区

腾讯轻联专区 

腾讯云开发专区

TAPD专区

腾讯轻量云游戏服专区

腾讯云最具价值专家

腾讯云架构师技术同盟

腾讯云创作之星

腾讯云开发者先锋

腾讯云AI代码助手

云原生构建

TAPD 敏捷项目管理

Cloud Studio

SDK中心

API中心

命令行工具

功能1上新10个字符

功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符。

功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符。

功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符

功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符

功能4上新

文章&问答评论现已支持表情

全新交互，全新视觉，新增快捷键、悬浮工具栏、高亮块等功能并同时优化现有功能，全面提升创作效率和体验

社区富文本编辑器全新改版！诚邀体验～ 

精选全网热门MCP server，让你的AI更好用 🚀

💥开发者 MCP广场重磅上线！

涵盖代码开发、场景应用、自动测试全流程，助你从零构建专属AI助手

一站式MCP教程库，解锁AI应用新玩法

聚焦“写作效率、视觉美观与运行性能”三方面进行全面升级，为您提供更高效、稳定的创作环境

社区富文本&Markdown编辑器全新改版上线，欢迎大家体验!

诚挚邀请您参与本次调研，分享您的真实使用感受与建议。您的反馈至关重要，感谢您的支持与参与！

社区新版编辑器体验调研

在编程中，哪种拼写是标准的或事实上的标准？它们之间有区别吗？在boost中我看到的是"adaptor"，而在文献中我看到的是“adaptor”。在代码中哪一个是首选的？

问"Adapter“还是"adaptor"？
EN

回答 10

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问"Adapter“还是"adaptor"？EN

回答 10

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问"Adapter“还是"adaptor"？
EN