blocks|key|4475536|text|对于一种更便宜的商业替代品，Inflectra的SpiraTest最近似乎变得相当流行。有关开源的信息，请查看TestLink。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|4475537|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.inflectra.com/HomePage.aspx|1|http://www.inflectra.com/SpiraTest/Default.aspx|2|http://www.testlink.org//^0|E|9|0|O|9|1|1J|8|2|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@$A|Q|B|R|1|S]|$A|T|B|U|1|V]|$A|W|B|X|1|Y]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|Z|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]|L|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|M]]|N|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|O]]]]

For a much cheaper commercial alternative <a href="http://www.inflectra.com/SpiraTest/Default.aspx" rel="nofollow noreferrer">SpiraTest</a> from <a href="http://www.inflectra.com/HomePage.aspx" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Inflectra</a> seems to be becoming quite popular these days. For open source check out <a href="http://www.testlink.org//" rel="nofollow noreferrer">TestLink</a>.

blocks|key|1798888|text|99%25的公司都买不起HP+Quality+Center。Testlink+(http://teamst.org)是免费的，但有一堆限制，而且他们不提供任何商业支持。XStudio+http://www.xqual.com是唯一免费的有价值的替代方案，并且有一个可选的(非常便宜--大约90欧元/用户)商业支持。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|offset|length|style|BOLD|entityRanges|data|1798889|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://teamst.org/|1|http://www.xqual.com/^0|A|H|S|8|2A|7|12|H|0|2I|K|1|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|P|8|@$9|Q|A|R|B|C]|$9|S|A|T|B|C]|$9|U|A|V|B|C]]|D|@$9|W|A|X|1|Y]|$9|Z|A|10|1|11]]|E|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|12|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|E|$L|M]]|N|$5|I|J|K|E|$L|O]]]]

HP Quality Center is not affordable for 99% of the companies. 
Testlink (<a href="http://teamst.org" rel="noreferrer">http://teamst.org</a>) is free but has a bunch of limitations and they do not provide any commercial support. 
XStudio <a href="http://www.xqual.com" rel="noreferrer">http://www.xqual.com</a> is the only free valuable alternative and there is an optional (very cheap - ~90€/user) commercial support.

blocks|key|4475783|text|您还应该查看QMetry测试管理工具。它是一个非常时髦的工具，可以很好地与几个缺陷跟踪器和测试自动化工具集成。网址http://www.qmetry.com|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|offset|length|style|BOLD|entityRanges|data|4475784|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.qmetry.com/^0|6|C|1L|L|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|N|8|@$9|O|A|P|B|C]]|D|@$9|Q|A|R|1|S]]|E|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|T|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|E|$L|M]]]]

You should also look at QMetry test management tool. It's a pretty sleek tool and integrates well with several defect trackers and test automation tools. The web address <a href="http://www.qmetry.com">http://www.qmetry.com</a>

blocks|key|5891103|text|可能有20多个不同的软件应用程序提供测试用例存储库、测试用例管理和测试管理。这三个短语的含义是不同的。价格从非常便宜到企业级不等。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|5891104|在执行测试管理的应用程序中，所有工具可能执行80%25的相同任务。80/20的标准规则适用。有几个应用程序更好，因为它们提供了其他应用程序没有的有价值的功能(每个人都有自己的功能，但它们并不是普遍有价值的)。|5891105|买家需要问自己以下10个问题：|5891106|1)如果他们想被锁定在一套可以做任何事情的产品中，尽管不是很好，但与同类中最好的技术相比，|5891107|2)如果他们想要使用供应商设计的产品或定制软件以使其成为自己的平台。|5891108|3)如果他们想要开箱即用的灵活性来与任何其他基础设施集成或为定制支付专业服务，|5891109|4)如果他们想要将错误从TM工具提交到JIRA/Bugzilla中，或者想要一个允许用户在TM工具中执行所有缺陷活动的UI，从而节省执行更多测试的时间|5891110|5)如果他们想要依赖用户手动刷新屏幕以了解更改，或者使用技术将更改自动推送到他们|5891111|6)如果他们希望每个项目或每个客户都可自定义仪表板，或者希望一刀切|5891112|7)如果他们想要使用过去的项目历史来预测当前项目和计划未来项目的完成日期，请使用直觉。|5891113|8)如果他们想让他们的外包公司管理他们，或者如果公司想管理他们的供应商|5891114|9)如果他们愿意迫使他们的组织在选择入门级工具的情况下年复一年地更换软件应用程序，或者如果一个人更好地选择了他们将在未来几年使用的应用程序。10)如果他们想要做出业务决策，以责任和可见性来管理测试团队，或者让他们选择他们喜欢的工具来进行日常使用。|5891115|询问你的供应商，他们是否可以做到以上几点。我希望这能帮到你|5891116|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|11|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|12|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|13|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|14|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|15|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|K|5|6|7|16|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|L|3|M|5|6|7|17|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|N|3|O|5|6|7|18|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|P|3|Q|5|6|7|19|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|R|3|S|5|6|7|1A|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|T|3|U|5|6|7|1B|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|V|3|W|5|6|7|1C|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|X|3|Y|5|6|7|1D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|Z|3|-4|5|6|7|1E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|10|$]]

There are probably more than 20 different software applications that offer testcase repositories, testcase management and test management. These three phrases mean different things. Prices vary from downright cheap to enterprise class. 

of the applications that do test management, all the tools probably do 80% of the same thing. standard rule of 80/20 applies. There are a couple applications that are better because they offer valuable functionality the others don't. (everyone will have their own features but they are not universally valuable)

buyers need to ask themselves these 10 questions:

1) if they want to be locked into a suite of products that does everything, albeit not as well, vs best of breed technologies, 
2)if they want to use a product as designed by the vendor or customize the software to make it their own platform. 
3) if they want out of the box flexibility to integrate with any other infrastructure or pay professional services for customizations, 
4) if they want to submit a bug from the TM tool into a JIRA/Bugzilla or want a UI that allows one to do all defect activities within the TM tool which saves time to do more testing 
5) if they want to rely on users to manually refresh screens to know about changes or use technology to have the changes automatically pushed to them 
6) if they want customisable dashboards per project or per customer or if one size fits all 
7) if they want to use past project history to predict finish dates for current projects and plan future projects vs use one's gut feel. 
8) if they want to have their outsourced company manage them or if the company wants to manage their providers 
9) if they are willing to force their organization to change software app year over year in the event a selection of an entry level tool is made or if one's better selecting an application they will use for years to come.
10) if they want to make a business decision to manage the testing team with accountability and visibility or let them testers choose a tool they like for their day to day use. 

Ask your vendors if they have can do the above. I hope this helps

blocks|key|4475750|text|QA管理套件的另一个非常好的解决方案是aqua。它包括类似质量中心的测试、需求和缺陷管理，还包括一个项目管理模块。它对用户(和开发人员)都很友好。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|4475751|您还可以直接从aqua使用不同的测试工具，从而可以根据您的自动化需求灵活地选择最优的工具，独立于测试管理。|4475752|我们已经在多个项目中使用了它，我从所有项目成员(开发人员、测试人员、项目经理等)那里获得了非常好的反馈。|4475753|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://aqua.andagon.com/eng/index.php^0|J|4|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@$A|Q|B|R|1|S]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|T|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|U|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|V|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|I|$J|$5|K|L|M|C|$N|O]]]]

Another very good solution for a QA Management suite ist <a href="http://aqua.andagon.com/eng/index.php" rel="nofollow">aqua</a>. It includes like Quality Center the test, requirements and defect management but also a project management module. It is really user (and developer) friendly. 

You also have the possibility to use different test tools directly from aqua to have the flexibility to select the optimal tool based on your automation needs independent from the test management. 

We use it already in multiple projects and I got very good feedback from all project members (developer, tester, project manager, ...)

blocks|key|1802105|text|你可以使用QPack+ALM+of+Orcanos，它是质量中心最接近的替代品。价格合理，他们还为小型团队提供了免费版本，包括测试管理、需求管理和缺陷跟踪|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1802106|杰克|1802107|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.orcanos.com/^0|5|K|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@$A|O|B|P|1|Q]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|M]]]]

You can use <a href="http://www.orcanos.com" rel="nofollow noreferrer">QPack ALM of Orcanos</a> which is the closest replacement for quality center. The price is reasonable and they also provide a free version for small teams, including test management, requirements management and defect tracking

Jack

blocks|key|4475557|text|让我们看看Selenium和FitNesse的混搭--+StoryTestIQ。它比QC对开发人员更友好，也可以用来创建“可执行规范”(用于BDD风格的开发)。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|4475558|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.openqa.org/selenium-core|1|http://www.fitnesse.org/|2|http://storytestiq.solutionsiq.com/wiki/Main_Page^0|5|8|0|E|8|1|S|B|2|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@$A|Q|B|R|1|S]|$A|T|B|U|1|V]|$A|W|B|X|1|Y]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|Z|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]|L|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|M]]|N|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|O]]]]

Have a look at <a href="http://storytestiq.solutionsiq.com/wiki/Main_Page" rel="nofollow noreferrer">StoryTestIQ</a> (STIQ), a mashup of <a href="http://www.openqa.org/selenium-core" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Selenium</a> and <a href="http://www.fitnesse.org/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">FitNesse</a>. It's way more developer friendly than QC and can be used too to create "executable specifications" (for BDD style development).

blocks|key|5891037|text|试试来自http://www.nmqa.com/的维也纳2，据我所知，这是微软合作并认证的唯一一款严肃的免费测试管理工具。它将在整个测试周期中为您提供帮助。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|5891038|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.nmqa.com/^0|4|K|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

Try Vienna 2 from <a href="http://www.nmqa.com/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://www.nmqa.com/</a> as far as I know this is the only serious free test management tool, partenered and certified by microsoft.
It will aid you during all the test cycle.

blocks|key|1802152|text|MSVS2010+Test+Proffesional/Ultimate|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1802153|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.microsoft.com/visualstudio/en-us/products/2010-editions/product-comparison^0|0|Z|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

<a href="http://www.microsoft.com/visualstudio/en-us/products/2010-editions/product-comparison" rel="nofollow">MSVS2010 Test Proffesional/Ultimate</a>

blocks|key|4475807|text|在将工具与质量中心进行比较时，您应该首先评估它们(其他工具)如何与QC的功能相结合。HP+Quality+Center有几个模块-要求管理、发布和周期管理、测试计划、测试实验室、缺陷管理和仪表板报告-这些模块无缝集成，以实现信息在测试阶段之间的顺畅流动。更多内容可以在这里找到：http://h20195.www2.hp.com/V2/GetPDF.aspx/4AA0-9587ENW.pdf|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|4475808|因此，在提供上述响应时，最好是贡献者在建议的替换工具与QC之间建立联系，例如，声明“您的建议”有测试计划、测试实验室和缺陷管理部分，但没有其他部分，等等。|4475809|我是QC的长期用户，我对其他工具如何能像QC一样或比QC更好地执行一些确凿的事实/发现非常感兴趣。我不得不说，如果任何人对上面提到的某个工具有深入的了解，并且他们使用QC超过1年，那么他们应该在这个主题上给出他们的“详细”利弊。通过这种方式，我们中更多习惯于QC的人发现自己正在跳槽到一个没有/想要QC的公司，他们可以自信地认为他们可以在其他工具中提供与QC相同级别的功能。|4475810|也许它应该是真正的工具创建者，他应该花时间告诉我们他们是如何站在QC功能旁边的。|4475811|只是我的专业意见。|4475812|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://h20195.www2.hp.com/V2/GetPDF.aspx/4AA0-9587ENW.pdf^0|3V|1L|0|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|T|8|@]|9|@$A|U|B|V|1|W]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|X|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|Y|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|Z|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|J|3|K|5|6|7|10|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|L|3|-4|5|6|7|11|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|M|$N|$5|O|P|Q|C|$R|S]]]]

When comparing tools against Quality Center you should start by assessing how they (the other tools) stack up to QC's functionality. "HP Quality Center has several modules—requirements management, release and cycle management, test plan, test lab, defects management, and dashboard reporting—that are seamlessly integrated to allow for the smooth flow of information across testing stages." more of the write found here: <a href="http://h20195.www2.hp.com/V2/GetPDF.aspx/4AA0-9587ENW.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://h20195.www2.hp.com/V2/GetPDF.aspx/4AA0-9587ENW.pdf</a>

So it would be best if when providing the responses above, that the contributor make the connections between the suggested replacement tool to QC, for example state that "your suggestion" has a test plan, test lab and defects management section but not the others, etc.

I have been a long time user of QC, and I would be very interested in some hard facts/findings of how another tool can perform just like or better than QC currently does. I would have to say that if anyone has in depth knowledge of one of the tools stated above AND they have also used QC for more than 1 yr then they should give their "detailed" Pros &amp; Cons on the subject. This way more of us that are used to QC and find ourselves moving to a company that does not have/want QC can feel confident they can provide the same level of functionality of QC in some other tool.

Maybe it should be the actual Tool creator who should take the time to tell us all how they stand up next to QC's functionality.

Just my professional input.

blocks|key|5890967|text|我们以前使用过Selenium，它对我们的前端测试非常好。我们以前也使用过ArtOfTest+WebAii工具，它为.net开发人员提供了很多很好的支持。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|5890968|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://seleniumhq.org/|1|http://www.artoftest.com/home.aspx^0|7|8|0|11|G|1|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@$A|O|B|P|1|Q]|$A|R|B|S|1|T]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|U|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]|L|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|M]]]]

We've used <a href="http://seleniumhq.org/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Selenium</a> before and it's been quite good for our front end testing. We've also used the <a href="http://www.artoftest.com/home.aspx" rel="nofollow noreferrer">ArtOfTest WebAii</a> tools before and it had a lot of good support for .net developers.

I'm looking for a more developer friendly alternative to HP (Mercury) Quality Center. 

I'm interested to find out what other tools developers &amp; testers are using out there to manage their functional and regression test cases.

High quality alternatives to HP (Mercury) Quality Center?

翻译质量差，导致语言生硬或混乱。

没有提供实际的解决方法或示例。

解答不清晰，无法理解或解决问题。

页面排版不美观，阅读体验差。

文章

问答

视频

教程

学习中心

腾讯云实验室

直播

竞赛

腾讯云代码分析专区

腾讯iOA零信任安全管理系统专区

腾讯云架构师技术同盟交流圈

腾讯云数据库专区

腾讯云智能顾问专区

腾讯云原生专区

腾讯混元专区

腾讯云TCE专区

腾讯云Lighthouse专区

腾讯云HAI专区

腾讯云Edgeone专区

腾讯云存储专区

腾讯云智能专区

腾讯轻联专区 

腾讯云开发专区

TAPD专区

腾讯轻量云游戏服专区

腾讯云最具价值专家

腾讯云架构师技术同盟

腾讯云创作之星

腾讯云开发者先锋

腾讯云AI代码助手

云原生构建

TAPD 敏捷项目管理

Cloud Studio

SDK中心

API中心

命令行工具

功能1上新10个字符

功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符。

功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符。

功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符

功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符

功能4上新

文章&问答评论现已支持表情

全新交互，全新视觉，新增快捷键、悬浮工具栏、高亮块等功能并同时优化现有功能，全面提升创作效率和体验

社区富文本编辑器全新改版！诚邀体验～ 

精选全网热门MCP server，让你的AI更好用 🚀

💥开发者 MCP广场重磅上线！

涵盖代码开发、场景应用、自动测试全流程，助你从零构建专属AI助手

一站式MCP教程库，解锁AI应用新玩法

聚焦“写作效率、视觉美观与运行性能”三方面进行全面升级，为您提供更高效、稳定的创作环境

社区富文本&Markdown编辑器全新改版上线，欢迎大家体验!

诚挚邀请您参与本次调研，分享您的真实使用感受与建议。您的反馈至关重要，感谢您的支持与参与！

社区新版编辑器体验调研

我正在寻找一个开发人员更友好的替代惠普(水星)质量中心。我感兴趣的是，开发人员和测试人员正在使用哪些其他工具来管理他们的功能和回归测试用例。

问高质量替代惠普(水星)质量中心？
EN

回答 11

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问高质量替代惠普(水星)质量中心？EN

回答 11

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问高质量替代惠普(水星)质量中心？
EN