blocks|key|4206047|text|我想你会发现你的团队会更喜欢Trac或Redmine而不是Bugzilla或Mantis。两者都能很好地与Subversion集成。两者都包括维基、论坛、项目管理功能……|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|4206048|快速概述：|4206049|python+Trac：被广泛使用和喜爱，用python编写，庞大的社区，大量的“插件”。一个常见的抱怨是，它不支持开箱即用的多个项目，但你可以添加一个插件来帮助解决这一问题。|4206050|Redmine：用RubyOnRails编写。与Trac类似，但更完整。Redmine的作者正试图创建一个比Trac更好的Trac。|offset|length|style|BOLD|4206051|如果你对其他搜索bug追踪器的人写的东西感兴趣，比较追踪器之间的差异，我在这里放了一些链接：|4206052|http://ifdefined.com/blog/post/2007/10/Links-to-other-comparisons-of-issue-trackers.aspx|4206053|如果您使用的是Windows，那么也可以考虑BugTracker.NET，这是.NET/MS+SQL+Server中的一个易于使用、可配置的bug+tracking系统。(免责声明:我是作者)。|4206054|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|1|http://ifdefined.com/bugtrackernet.html^0|0|0|0|0|7|0|0|0|2G|0|0|1Y|C|1|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|10|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|11|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|12|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|13|8|@$H|14|I|15|J|K]]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|L|3|M|5|6|7|16|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|N|3|O|5|6|7|17|8|@]|9|@$H|18|I|19|1|1A]]|A|$]]|$1|P|3|Q|5|6|7|1B|8|@]|9|@$H|1C|I|1D|1|1E]]|A|$]]|$1|R|3|-4|5|6|7|1F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|S|$T|$5|U|V|W|A|$X|O]]|Y|$5|U|V|W|A|$X|Z]]]]

I think you'll find that your team will like either Trac or Redmine more than Bugzilla or Mantis. Both integrate nicely with Subversion. Both include wiki, forums, project management features... 

Quick overview:

Trac: Very widely used and loved, written in python, huge community, lots of "plugins". A common complaint is that it doesn't support multiple projects out-of-the-box, but you can add a plugin to help with that.

Redmine: Written in RubyOnRails. Like Trac, but more complete out of the box. The authors of Redmine are trying to create a better Trac than Trac.

If you are interested in what others searching for bug trackers have written, comparing trackers to each other, I've put some links together here: 
<a href="http://ifdefined.com/blog/post/2007/10/Links-to-other-comparisons-of-issue-trackers.aspx" rel="noreferrer">http://ifdefined.com/blog/post/2007/10/Links-to-other-comparisons-of-issue-trackers.aspx</a>

If you on Windows, which I'm guessing you aren't, then also consider BugTracker.NET, an easy-to-use, very configurable <a href="http://ifdefined.com/bugtrackernet.html" rel="noreferrer">bug tracking</a> system in .NET/MS SQL Server. (Disclaimer: I'm the author).

blocks|key|1667864|text|我喜欢蝙蝠侠。它很简单，而且可以完成工作。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1667865|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

I like mantis. It's simple and it gets the job done.

blocks|key|4206104|text|我用过Bugzilla和Mantis，但我更喜欢Mantis的简单。它不像Bugzilla那样功能丰富，但我记得和Bugzilla战斗的次数要多得多。Mantis是这样的东西，你可以设置一次，然后离开。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|4206105|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

I've used Bugzilla and Mantis, but I prefer Mantis' simplicity. It's not as feature rich as Bugzilla but, I remember fighting with Bugzilla a lot more. Mantis is the kind of thing you can setup once then leave.

blocks|key|4206289|text|Mantis在可用性方面绝对胜过Bugzilla。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|4206290|特别是，在Mantis上记录bug的速度要快得多。记录bug的时间对一些人来说是一个拦路虎--我听说它被用作不记录bug的借口，修复它们，假装从来没有bug需要修复(这是更深层次的团队问题的症状)。|4206291|直到一个客户端(目前正在使用Basecamp，bleah!)我保留了Mantis的想法，因为它不够漂亮，以至于我意识到有些人(如上所述)认为它很丑陋。|4206292|与Bugzilla或我们尝试实现的其他系统相比，一些奇怪的欧洲东西，Mantis是华丽的。|4206293|我知道Mantis的鳞片很好--一个朋友在电影“快乐的脚”的制作中用到了它。他通过添加一个额外的字段来定制它，以提供另一个级别的分类。|4206294|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|M|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|O|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|-4|5|6|7|Q|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|K|$]]

Mantis definitely wins on usability grounds over Bugzilla.

In particular, it is just a lot faster to log bugs on Mantis. Time to log bugs is a blocker for some people - I've heard it used as an excuse for not logging them, fixing them and pretending there was never a bug to fix (symptomatic of deeper team problems).

It wasn't until a client (currently using Basecamp, bleah!) canned the idea of Mantis because it wasn't pretty enough that I realised some people (as noted above) think it is ugly.

Compared to Bugzilla or another system we tried implementing, some weird European thing, Mantis is gorgeous.

I know Mantis scales well - a friend used it for the production of the movie Happy Feet. He customised it by adding one extra field to provide another level of categorisation.

blocks|key|5623926|text|Bugzilla更大，更大的社区，更多的功能，更强大的力量...出于这个原因，我一直更喜欢mantis+;)+Mantis丑陋如罪，但对于大多数项目来说，它以一种简单而直观的方式满足了您的需求。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|5623927|如果你有一个大的团队，一个大的QA部门和所有其他的bugzillia可能会更合适。一个只需要把事情做好的小团队--在我看来，mantis可能更好。|5623928|mantis缺少的最大功能(他们可能已经添加了它，这是几年前的事了)是报告功能，这样你就可以用漂亮的折线图和饼图来跟踪进度。但是，我只是编写了一个简单的PHP脚本来提取数据，并每周在Excel中手动创建它们(只需要5分钟左右)。不是很好，但在功能上足以满足我们当时的需求。|5623929|然而，这两个都有在线演示，所以我建议你尝试一下，选择最适合你的。|5623930|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|M|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|I|$]]

Bugzilla is bigger, a larger community, more features, more power ... for that reason I've always prefered mantis ;) Mantis is as ugly as sin but for most projects it gives you what you need in a simple and intuative way.
If you have a large team, a big QA department and all the rest bugzillia may be a better fit. Small team that just needs to get stuff done - then mantis is probably better in my opinion.
The biggest feature missing from mantis (they may have added it since, this was a few years ago) is the reports feature so you can track progress with nice line and pie charts. However, I just wrote a simple PHP script to pull out the data and manually created them in Excel each week (only took 5 minutes or so). Not great but functionally sufficient for what we needed at the time.
However there online demos of both so I suggest you try them out and pick what suits you the best.

blocks|key|4206145|text|Mantis很棒，而且很容易设置|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|offset|length|style|BOLD|entityRanges|data|4206146|我已经用了大约3年了|4206147|它有以下问题。|4206148|您可以存储的文件大小有2+is的限制。当您想要包含问题的屏幕截图时，这就成了一个问题。|4206149|如果两个人同时更新问题-有人将丢失数据|4206150|entityMap^0|0|G|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|P|8|@$9|Q|A|R|B|C]]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|S|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|T|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|J|3|K|5|6|7|U|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|L|3|M|5|6|7|V|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|N|3|-4|5|6|7|W|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]]|O|$]]

Mantis is great and very easy to setup

I have been using it for about 3 years

It has the following problems.

There is a 2 Meg limit on the file size that you can store in issue. This becomes a problem when you want to include screen shots of the problem. 

If two people update the issue at the same time - Someone will lose data

blocks|key|5623908|text|这两个我都用过，一点也不喜欢，我更喜欢Trac，如果你真的需要在这两个中选择，我会选择Bugzilla。TRAC与subversion的集成非常好(看看Assembla是如何工作的)|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|5623909|Trac也是开源的，添加新的报告和类似的东西非常简单。|5623910|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://trac.edgewall.org/|1|http://www.assembla.com/^0|J|4|0|24|8|1|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@$A|Q|B|R|1|S]|$A|T|B|U|1|V]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|W|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|X|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|M]]|N|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|O]]]]

I have used both and didn't like them at all, I prefer <a href="http://trac.edgewall.org/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Trac</a>, thou if you really need to choose between those two I'd go for Bugzilla
The integration for TRAC with subversion is real good (have a look at <a href="http://www.assembla.com/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Assembla</a> to see how the integration works )

Trac is also open source and its pretty simple to add new reports and stuff like that.

blocks|key|2095558|text|Mantis是伟大而简单的，简单是重要的，因为我的客户是非技术人员。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|2095559|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

Mantis is great and simple,
simplicity is important as my clients are non technical people.

blocks|key|4205886|text|你可以试试Redmine。它为您提供回购访问，跟踪器，论坛，维基，日历-在一个地方。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|4205887|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://redmine.org/^0|5|7|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

You could try <a href="http://redmine.org" rel="noreferrer">Redmine</a>. It gives you repo access, trackers, forums, wiki, calendar - in one place.

blocks|key|1667946|text|我广泛地使用了Bugzilla+(工作中项目的默认设置)，但Mantis因为易于安装和使用而赢得了我的支持。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1667947|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

I have extensively used Bugzilla (default for projects at work) but Mantis gets my vote for easy setup and use.

blocks|key|4206213|text|我听说过关于fogbugz的好消息，但还没有找到使用它的机会。http://www.fogcreek.com/FogBUGZ/|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|4206214|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.fogcreek.com/FogBUGZ/^0|V|W|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

I've heard good things about fogbugz but have yet to find an opportunity to use it.
<a href="http://www.fogcreek.com/FogBUGZ/" rel="noreferrer">http://www.fogcreek.com/FogBUGZ/</a>

blocks|key|5624163|text|我更喜欢蝙蝠侠。它的性能很好，很容易通过使用插件或通过编码进行扩展。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|5624164|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

I prefer mantis. It performs nicely and is easily extend able either by the use of plugins or with by coding.

blocks|key|2095374|text|对Trac的另一次投票--非常简单的上手，很好的基于web的仓库视图，等等。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|2095375|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

Another vote for Trac -- dead simple to get going, nice web-based view into your repository, etc.

blocks|key|1665250|text|选择正确的bug跟踪器要求您知道谁将使用它(以及如何使用它)。我用过Bugzilla和Mantis，从技术角度看Bugzilla更好，但如果你的一些bug记者不是程序员/不是程序员，那么Mantis就赢了。它的界面对于bugtracker新手来说不那么“危险”。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1665251|如果你要有一个私人的etc跟踪器，你还需要考虑它提供给你的选项，以指定谁被允许查看/编辑等。|1665252|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

Choosing the right bug tracker requires that you know who is going to use it (and how it is going to be used). I've used Bugzilla and Mantis and found Bugzilla better from a technical point of view but Mantis wins if some of your bug reporters are not programmers / not programmer minded. Its interface is less 'threatening' for a novice bugtracker user.

If you are going to have a private bugtracker you also need to consider the options it gives you to specify who is allowed to view/edit etc.

blocks|key|1668003|text|我使用bugzilla已经有一段时间了，但Redmine得到了我的支持。安装简单，非常非常直观。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1668004|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

I've used bugzilla for a while, but Redmine get my vote. easy setup, very very intuitive.

As the title says, I'm starting one project right now, and trying to layout the infrastructure for the project (SVN, Email, Bug tracking, Online Forums, etc...)

So, Bugzilla or Mantis?

Bugzilla or Mantis?

翻译质量差，导致语言生硬或混乱。

没有提供实际的解决方法或示例。

解答不清晰，无法理解或解决问题。

页面排版不美观，阅读体验差。

文章

问答

视频

教程

学习中心

腾讯云实验室

直播

竞赛

腾讯云代码分析专区

腾讯iOA零信任安全管理系统专区

腾讯云架构师技术同盟交流圈

腾讯云数据库专区

腾讯云智能顾问专区

腾讯云原生专区

腾讯混元专区

腾讯云TCE专区

腾讯云Lighthouse专区

腾讯云HAI专区

腾讯云Edgeone专区

腾讯云存储专区

腾讯云智能专区

腾讯轻联专区 

腾讯云开发专区

TAPD专区

腾讯轻量云游戏服专区

腾讯云最具价值专家

腾讯云架构师技术同盟

腾讯云创作之星

腾讯云开发者先锋

腾讯云AI代码助手

云原生构建

TAPD 敏捷项目管理

Cloud Studio

SDK中心

API中心

命令行工具

功能1上新10个字符

功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符。

功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符。

功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符

功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符

功能4上新

文章&问答评论现已支持表情

全新交互，全新视觉，新增快捷键、悬浮工具栏、高亮块等功能并同时优化现有功能，全面提升创作效率和体验

社区富文本编辑器全新改版！诚邀体验～ 

精选全网热门MCP server，让你的AI更好用 🚀

💥开发者 MCP广场重磅上线！

涵盖代码开发、场景应用、自动测试全流程，助你从零构建专属AI助手

一站式MCP教程库，解锁AI应用新玩法

聚焦“写作效率、视觉美观与运行性能”三方面进行全面升级，为您提供更高效、稳定的创作环境

社区富文本&Markdown编辑器全新改版上线，欢迎大家体验!

诚挚邀请您参与本次调研，分享您的真实使用感受与建议。您的反馈至关重要，感谢您的支持与参与！

社区新版编辑器体验调研

正如标题所说，我现在正在启动一个项目，并尝试为该项目布局基础设施(SVN、电子邮件、Bug跟踪、在线论坛等)。那么，Bugzilla还是Mantis？

问Bugzilla还是Mantis？
EN

回答 15

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问Bugzilla还是Mantis？EN

回答 15

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问Bugzilla还是Mantis？
EN