我的Neo4j服务器在执行并发请求时抛出DeadlockDetectedExceptions,我不知道为什么。
以下代码由客户端REST请求调用的服务器插件调用,并在单个事务中发生。
Node nFollowing = loadUser(idFollowing);
Node nFollowed = loadUser(idFollowed);
// locking order to avoid deadlocks
if (Long.valueOf(idFollowing) < Long.valueOf(idFollowed)) {
tx.acquireWriteLock(nFollowing);
tx.acquireWriteLock(nFollowed);
} else {
tx.acquireWriteLock(nFollowed);
tx.acquireWriteLock(nFollowing);
}
// create relationship if not present
for (Relationship followship : nFollowing.getRelationships(
EdgeType.FOLLOWS, Direction.OUTGOING)) {
if (followship.getEndNode().equals(nFollowed)) {
return;
}
}
nFollowing.createRelationshipTo(nFollowed, EdgeType.FOLLOWS);尽管我考虑了死锁,但抛出了以下异常,表明在创建关系时发生了死锁。
异常(略微减少):
"ForsetiClient[78] can't acquire ExclusiveLock{owner=ForsetiClient[73]} on
RELATIONSHIP(49), because holders of that lock are waiting for ForsetiClient[78].\n
Wait list:ExclusiveLock[ForsetiClient[73] waits for [73, 78, ]]",
"exception" : "DeadlockDetectedException",
"fullname" : "org.neo4j.kernel.DeadlockDetectedException",
"stacktrace" : [
"org.neo4j.kernel.ha.lock.forseti.ForsetiClient.markAsWaitingFor(ForsetiClient.java:611)",
"org.neo4j.kernel.ha.lock.forseti.ForsetiClient.acquireExclusive(ForsetiClient.java:190)",
"org.neo4j.kernel.impl.nioneo.xa.TransactionalRelationshipLocker.getWriteLock(TransactionalRelationshipLocker.java:33)",
"org.neo4j.kernel.impl.core.NodeProxy.createRelationshipTo(NodeProxy.java:455)",
"de.uniko.sebschlicht.neo4j.graphity.WriteOptimizedGraphity.addFollowship(WriteOptimizedGraphity.java:40)",
"de.uniko.sebschlicht.neo4j.graphity.Graphity.addFollowship(Graphity.java:115)",
"de.uniko.sebschlicht.neo4j.GraphityBaselinePlugin.follow(GraphityBaselinePlugin.java:38)",
"org.neo4j.server.rest.web.ExtensionService.invokeGraphDatabaseExtension(ExtensionService.java:134)",
"org.neo4j.server.rest.transactional.TransactionalRequestDispatcher.dispatch(TransactionalRequestDispatcher.java:139)"
]我不明白为什么:我已经有了nFolloing和nFollowed的锁。实际上,死锁的目标不是节点锁,而是关系锁。由于仅在关系不存在时创建关系,因此锁持有者必须是当前锁持有者。
如果这是正确的,锁持有者正在等待自己。我该如何避免这种情况,或者异常还想说些什么呢?
以防万一:我不想使用synchronized块,它是suggested,也是marked as to be avoided by Neo4j,因为它会大大减慢我的服务速度,而且我不希望这些并发请求经常发生。
发布于 2014-09-18 21:56:36
死锁是由snychronized块和手动事务锁共同引起的。我没有从之前执行的测试中删除synchronized语句。尽管synchronized语句没有针对锁定的节点,但还是引发了异常。这两种锁定机制似乎是不兼容的。
这导致了一个奇怪的错误消息,对我来说帮助不大。
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/25161837
复制相似问题