我正在做一个有趣的项目,涉及从正则表达式生成解析树。我已经让它大部分工作了,但是我被如何集成连接挂住了。
*Main> :l regex.hs
[1 of 1] Compiling Main ( regex.hs, interpreted )
Ok, modules loaded: Main.
*Main> toPostfix "a"
"a"
*Main> toPostfix "a|b"
"ab|"
*Main> toPostfix "((a|b)|c)"
"ab|c|"
*Main> toPostfix "((a|b)|c)de"
"ab|c|de"
*Main> toPostfix "((a|b)|c)*de"
"ab|c|*de"
*Main> toPostfix "(ab)*"
"ab*" -- Should be ab&*
*Main> toPostfix "(ab|bc)"
"abbc|" -- Should be ab&bc&|下面是我的代码:
import Data.List
import Control.Monad
data Reg = Epsilon |
Literal Char |
Or Reg Reg |
Concat Reg Reg |
Star Reg
deriving Eq
showReg :: Reg -> [Char]
showReg Epsilon = "@"
showReg (Literal c) = [c]
showReg (Or r1 r2) = "(" ++ showReg r1 ++ "|" ++ showReg r2 ++ ")"
showReg (Concat r1 r2) = "(" ++ showReg r1 ++ showReg r2 ++ ")"
showReg (Star r) = showReg r ++ "*"
instance Show Reg where
show = showReg
evalPostfix :: String -> Reg
evalPostfix = head . foldl comb []
where
comb :: [Reg] -> Char -> [Reg]
comb (x:y:ys) '|' = (Or y x) : ys
comb (x:y:ys) '&' = (Concat y x) : ys
comb (x:xs) '*' = (Star x) : xs
comb xs '@' = Epsilon : xs
comb xs s = (Literal s) : xs
-- Apply the shunting-yard algorithm to turn an infix expression
-- into a postfix expression.
shunt :: String -> String -> String -> String
shunt o p [] = (reverse o) ++ p
shunt o [] (x:xs)
| x == '(' = shunt o [x] xs
| x == '|' = shunt o [x] xs
| otherwise = shunt (x:o) [] xs
shunt o (p:ps) (x:xs)
| x == '(' = shunt o (x:p:ps) xs
| x == ')' = case (span (/= '(') (p:ps)) of
(as, b:bs) -> shunt (as ++ o) bs xs
| x == '|' = case (p) of
'(' -> shunt o (x:p:ps) xs
otherwise -> shunt (p:o) (x:ps) xs
| x == '*' = shunt (x:o) (p:ps) xs
| otherwise = shunt (x:o) (p:ps) xs
-- | Convert an infix expression to postfix
toPostfix :: String -> String
toPostfix = shunt [] []
-- | Evaluate an infix expression
eval :: String -> Reg
eval = evalPostfix . toPostfix特别是,分流功能正在执行所有繁重的提升,这是应该进行更改的地方。(可以很容易地在evalPostfix中构建树。)
现在,我花了几个小时寻找一个教程,解释如何做到这一点,但没有任何运气。如果有人能看到如何修改代码,或者能给我指明正确的方向,我将不胜感激。
发布于 2012-04-28 18:55:34
调车场算法主要用于处理中缀运算符到后缀运算符的转换。两个复杂的问题是正则表达式语法已经有了一个后缀操作符*,以及中缀连接操作符是隐式的。这些的组合使得解析变得很烦人。
"abcd“加上infix &会是什么样子?它是a&b&c&d。这应该是后缀ab&c&d&还是abcd&?第一个是左关联的,第二个是右关联的。我认为第二种方法更适合解析正则表达式。
现在,a、b、c或d中的每一个都可能是括号中的正则表达式,并且每个表达式后面都可能跟一个'*‘。
我将了解如何增强您的代码以添加&...
更新:你的代码在
*Main> toPostfix' "a|bcd"
"abcd|"我不能轻松地修复bug并将其扩展到add &,所以我现在放弃了。
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/10361303
复制相似问题