在drawLayer:inContext过程中调用的setNeedsDisplayInRect：

Question

我在我的应用程序中使用了CATiledLayer，因此，该图层的绘制是在后台线程中完成的。也就是说，我的委托的drawLayer:inContext:方法是从后台线程调用的。用于使CATiledLayer的某些部分无效的setNeedsDisplayInRect始终从主线程调用。

因为它们是独立的线程，所以当后台线程在drawLayer:inContext方法中时，偶尔会调用setNeedsDisplayInRect。我注意到在这种情况下setNeedsDisplayInRect被忽略了(不会再次调用drawLayer:inContext)。

我已经记录了一个bug to Apple，因为我认为这是不正确的。但我很难弄清楚如何解决这种情况。你有什么好主意吗？

编辑：

我使用以下代码测试了斯坦尼斯劳的答案：

- (void) setNeedsDisplayInRect:(CGRect)rect
{
    NSLog(@"setNeedsDisplayInRect:%@", NSStringFromCGRect(rect));
    [super setNeedsDisplayInRect:rect];
}

- (void) drawLayer:(CALayer *)layer inContext:(CGContextRef)gc
{
    CGRect bounds = CGContextGetClipBoundingBox(gc);
    NSLog(@"drawLayer:inContext: bounds=%@", NSStringFromCGRect(bounds));

    dispatch_async(dispatch_get_current_queue(), ^{
        [self setNeedsDisplayInRect:bounds];
    });

    CGContextSetFillColorWithColor(gc, testColor.CGColor);
    CGContextFillRect(gc, bounds);
    sleep(0.2); // simulate the time it takes to draw complicated graphics
    NSLog(@"end drawLayer:inContext: bounds=%@", NSStringFromCGRect(bounds));
}

正如所给出的，代码确实会导致绘制无限重复，但有时在setNeedsDisplayInRect:和相应的drawLayer:inContext:之间会有长达5秒的延迟，其中不会发生任何其他事情。请参见下面的日志作为示例。注意不规则的行为:在第一秒内，一些瓦片被重绘多次，而另一些瓦片只被重绘一次。然后有5秒的暂停，循环再次开始。

这是在使用IOS6.0的模拟器上测试的(我选择这个版本，因为早期版本有另一个在6.0中修复的bug :它们有时会绘制两次相同的瓦片)。

2012-10-27 15:51:38.771 TiledLayerTest[39934:15a13] drawLayer:inContext: bounds={{0, 300}, {300, 180}}
2012-10-27 15:51:38.774 TiledLayerTest[39934:15a13] end drawLayer:inContext: bounds={{0, 300}, {300, 180}}
2012-10-27 15:51:38.774 TiledLayerTest[39934:1570f] drawLayer:inContext: bounds={{300, 0}, {20, 300}}
2012-10-27 15:51:38.776 TiledLayerTest[39934:1570f] end drawLayer:inContext: bounds={{300, 0}, {20, 300}}
2012-10-27 15:51:38.776 TiledLayerTest[39934:1630b] setNeedsDisplayInRect:{{0, 300}, {300, 180}}
2012-10-27 15:51:38.777 TiledLayerTest[39934:1540f] setNeedsDisplayInRect:{{300, 0}, {20, 300}}
2012-10-27 15:51:38.780 TiledLayerTest[39934:15a13] drawLayer:inContext: bounds={{300, 0}, {20, 300}}
2012-10-27 15:51:38.781 TiledLayerTest[39934:15a13] end drawLayer:inContext: bounds={{300, 0}, {20, 300}}
2012-10-27 15:51:38.782 TiledLayerTest[39934:1540f] setNeedsDisplayInRect:{{300, 0}, {20, 300}}
2012-10-27 15:51:38.789 TiledLayerTest[39934:1570f] drawLayer:inContext: bounds={{0, 0}, {300, 300}}
2012-10-27 15:51:38.791 TiledLayerTest[39934:15a13] drawLayer:inContext: bounds={{300, 300}, {20, 180}}
2012-10-27 15:51:38.792 TiledLayerTest[39934:15a13] end drawLayer:inContext: bounds={{300, 300}, {20, 180}}
2012-10-27 15:51:38.793 TiledLayerTest[39934:1570f] end drawLayer:inContext: bounds={{0, 0}, {300, 300}}
2012-10-27 15:51:38.795 TiledLayerTest[39934:1540f] setNeedsDisplayInRect:{{0, 0}, {300, 300}}
2012-10-27 15:51:38.795 TiledLayerTest[39934:1540f] setNeedsDisplayInRect:{{300, 300}, {20, 180}}
2012-10-27 15:51:38.798 TiledLayerTest[39934:15a13] drawLayer:inContext: bounds={{0, 0}, {300, 300}}
2012-10-27 15:51:38.800 TiledLayerTest[39934:15a13] end drawLayer:inContext: bounds={{0, 0}, {300, 300}}
2012-10-27 15:51:38.802 TiledLayerTest[39934:1630b] setNeedsDisplayInRect:{{0, 0}, {300, 300}}
2012-10-27 15:51:38.806 TiledLayerTest[39934:1570f] drawLayer:inContext: bounds={{0, 300}, {300, 180}}
2012-10-27 15:51:38.808 TiledLayerTest[39934:1630b] setNeedsDisplayInRect:{{0, 300}, {300, 180}}
2012-10-27 15:51:38.809 TiledLayerTest[39934:1570f] end drawLayer:inContext: bounds={{0, 300}, {300, 180}}
2012-10-27 15:51:38.813 TiledLayerTest[39934:15a13] drawLayer:inContext: bounds={{0, 300}, {300, 180}}
2012-10-27 15:51:38.816 TiledLayerTest[39934:1630b] setNeedsDisplayInRect:{{0, 300}, {300, 180}}
2012-10-27 15:51:38.816 TiledLayerTest[39934:15a13] end drawLayer:inContext: bounds={{0, 300}, {300, 180}}
2012-10-27 15:51:43.774 TiledLayerTest[39934:1540f] drawLayer:inContext: bounds={{0, 300}, {300, 180}}
2012-10-27 15:51:43.776 TiledLayerTest[39934:1540f] end drawLayer:inContext: bounds={{0, 300}, {300, 180}}
2012-10-27 15:51:43.776 TiledLayerTest[39934:1630f] drawLayer:inContext: bounds={{0, 0}, {300, 300}}

Answer 1

我已经发布了我对类似问题的答案：setNeedsDisplayInMapRect doesn't trigger new drawMapRect: call (这里只是一个不重复答案的链接)。

简而言之:您应该向dispatch_get_main_queue()分派一个setNeedsDisplayInRect方法调用。

Answer 2

您可以尝试以这种方式使用NSRecursiveLock：

- (void) setNeedsDisplayInRect:(CGRect)rect
{
    [self.lock lock]
    NSLog(@"setNeedsDisplayInRect:%@", NSStringFromCGRect(rect));
    [super setNeedsDisplayInRect:rect];
    [self.lock unlock]
}

- (void) drawLayer:(CALayer *)layer inContext:(CGContextRef)gc
{
    [self.lock lock]
    CGRect bounds = CGContextGetClipBoundingBox(gc);
    NSLog(@"drawLayer:inContext: bounds=%@", NSStringFromCGRect(bounds));


    // drawing code


    NSLog(@"end drawLayer:inContext: bounds=%@", NSStringFromCGRect(bounds));
    [self.lock unlock]
}

这可确保在绘图过程中不会调用setNeedsDisplayInRect。但是，这可能会影响性能，因为lock可能会阻塞主线程，并且您不能并行绘制多个平铺。